RE: [JBoss-user] entityContext.getEJBLocalObject() returns local interface of another object

2003-07-11 Thread Alexey Yudichev
I did not check yet for other fields. I will do it now and see. But it will take some time until our next development iteration is finished and released. As I said, I perform the check inside one of business methods of the entity bean: public abstract class TerminalBean extends MMSBean

AW: [JBoss-user] Socket TimeOut using RMI/JNDI over HTTP

2003-07-11 Thread Janardhan Burugupalli
HI All, I am accessing JNDI/RMI over http on port 80. So everything works fine and if i try to read larger data from a bean then i get the following error. I guess the erro might be due to the socket time out. Is there any place for the time out of the socket or some thing like that in the

[JBoss-user] Delivery Status Notification

2003-07-11 Thread Mail Delivery Service
- These recipients of your message have been processed by the mail server: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Failed; 5.2.2 (mailbox full) Remote MTA ims2c.libero.it: SMTP diagnostic: 552 RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailbox disk quota exceeded Reporting-MTA: dns; smtp8.libero.it Received-from-MTA: dns;

Re: [JBoss-user] sync-on-commit-only

2003-07-11 Thread Simone Milani
Hi Jeremy, I am using this set to false in conjuction with a nonnullable FK-Field field to insure that the NON NULL constraint is always respected inside the transaction. Am I wrong? Thanks Simone - Original Message - From: Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [JBoss-user] transactions synchronizations

2003-07-11 Thread Raghuram
Is this not taken care of if Commit Option B or C is specified ? raghu -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeremy Boynes Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 5:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] transactions synchronizations There

RE: [JBoss-user] transactions synchronizations

2003-07-11 Thread Raghuram
Commit Option B/C with Instance Per Transaction should work?? raghu -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeremy Boynes Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 5:30 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] transactions synchronizations There are a

Re: [JBoss-user] sync-on-commit-only

2003-07-11 Thread Stefan Arentz
On Thursday, July 10, 2003, at 19:23, Jeremy Boynes wrote: This causes the container to flush e.g. before executing finders, which is required (and often desired) behaviour. Setting this to true will mean finders will not be aware of any modifications already made in the transaction. I'd

[JBoss-user] JBoss Presentation at St. Louis Java Users Group

2003-07-11 Thread Weiqi Gao
Hi, I did a presentation at the St. Louis Java Users Group last night. The presentation material is available at the St. Louis JUG website http://www.ociweb.com/javasig/knowledgebase.html. The focus is on getting started with JBoss 3.2.1, physically, from scratch. Please, if you are a

RE: [JBoss-user] JMS behind a firewall.

2003-07-11 Thread Lyvers, William
Hauer, This is the code that is executing on each request. At this point in time, we haven't even began caching off the context and such. One thing that I did notice, is that we are binding the clients to one port using the org.jboss.mq.il.uil2.localAddr and

AW: [JBoss-user] JNDI/RMI over http - IllegalStateException

2003-07-11 Thread Janardhan Burugupalli
HI All, I was testing the RMI/JNDI over http on port 80. We configured a firewall which allows only port 80 and everything seems to be working fine. We had done a very rigorous testing and we encountered the following exception as al of our clients are hanged and after a while we got the

[JBoss-user] problem in deploying MBean via mBean-service.xml

2003-07-11 Thread Marco.Mistroni
hi all, i am trying to deploy a standalone MBean by using myMbean-service.xml i drop the jar file in the jbossdir\server\default\lib directory and i have added the myMbean-service.xml into the jbossdir\server\default\deploy in the initialization, my MBean looks for a JMS

[JBoss-user] Finder performance

2003-07-11 Thread Jon Barnett
OK. This is just an update on the performance modifications. The latest change is actually not a big one - as with most of the changes I have implemented. The underlying findEntities works with an ArrayList but returns a Collection. So I changed this to return an ArrayList. The Trove benchmarks

Re: [JBoss-user] problem in deploying MBean via mBean-service.xml

2003-07-11 Thread julien viet
you need to use the depends tag : mbean code=... name=... dependsdomain:name=something/depends ... /mbean MMnc hi all, MMnc i am trying to deploy a standalone MBean by MMnc using myMbean-service.xml MMnc i drop the jar file in the jbossdir\server\default\lib directory MMnc

[JBoss-user] Single instance entity bean

2003-07-11 Thread Martin Vilcans
Hi! A simple question: How do I create a CMP entity bean with only one instance? I need an entity bean that holds the current date as a week and a day number, stored as two columns in a table with only one row. Since there's only one row in the table, I don't need a primary key. I have created

RE: [JBoss-user] problem in deploying MBean via mBean-service.xml

2003-07-11 Thread Marco.Mistroni
HI Julien thanx a lot 4 the suggestion.. but unfortunately i cannot figure out domain and service for a JMS ConnectionFactory do u know something about that? thanx and regards marco -Original Message- From: ext julien viet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 July,

RE: [JBoss-user] Finder performance

2003-07-11 Thread Bill Burke
Can you please make a list of all that you are doing? The Metadata memory footprint, and all the collection stuff you are doing? We'd like to incorporate these into 3.2.3. Thanks, Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jon Barnett Sent:

Re: [JBoss-user] JMS behind a firewall.

2003-07-11 Thread Scott M Stark
The previous message shown an exception due to the jms destination being shutdown due undeployment of the destination service descriptor. This cannot be triggered by the close of the jms connection so how is that coming about? Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss

RE: [JBoss-user] Finder performance

2003-07-11 Thread Bill Burke
Another thing, do you require the user to do ArrayList list results = (ArrayList)home.findByBlah(); ?? Or are you saying the the Iterator uses get? Thanks, Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jon Barnett Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003

RE: [JBoss-user] JMS behind a firewall.

2003-07-11 Thread Lyvers, William
Nice catch Scott. That stack trace was coming from a hot deployment of jbossmq-service.xml to change from UIL2 to UIL without changing the JNDI name. I copied and pasted the wrong stack trace. Sorry for the mistake. The real stack trace from my UIL2 problem is below. The UIL2 works a couple

[JBoss-user] Clustering grins and woes

2003-07-11 Thread Kevin Duffey
Hey all, Is this a better place than the jboss forums to get help? Anyway, I am most impressed with the feature set of JBoss clustering. Bill/Sacha did a great job. There are some issues which I have come across though and would like to point out, and possibly get help on if I am doing it

RE: [JBoss-user] Clustering grins and woes

2003-07-11 Thread Bill Burke
What version of JBoss? I thought I fixed that problem in 3.2. All farm/ dirs should be in synch no matter when a node is started. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin Duffey Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 2:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [JBoss-user] Clustering grins and woes

2003-07-11 Thread Kevin Duffey
Sorry, I always forget that. 3.2.2RC1. We are not seeing this work. I see the nodes show up and talking to each other, I just don't see the app being deployed (when starting up a new clean node) from an already running node. I also don't see re-deployment farming working at all. At least the

[JBoss-user] new jmx authentication problem

2003-07-11 Thread manish sharan
Hi, I am using jboss 3.0.7 and I have secured the jms-conole app to force anyone who accsess myserver.com/jmx-console to authenticate and this works fine. However, I downloaded a swing based jmx browser client(http://www.ejtools.org/) and pointed it to my jboss servers( jnp://ipaddress:1099

Re: [JBoss-user] JMS behind a firewall.

2003-07-11 Thread Scott M Stark
This simply means that the local address/port you want to bind the client socket to is already in use. If the connections are being created too quickly then the os may not be cleaning up the local address for reuse or there is an unclean close that is leaving the local socket in a fin wait state

[JBoss-user] question about 3.2.x docs

2003-07-11 Thread Erik Price
Hi, On page 197 of the 3.2.x JBoss docs (JBoss Administration and Development, 3rd Edition), the description of jboss-web.xml says that within the resource-ref element, an optional res-type element can appear. However, the jboss-web_3_2.dtd doesn't seem to allow this element to appear. Is

Re: [JBoss-user] new jmx authentication problem

2003-07-11 Thread Scott M Stark
Remove all of the unsecured RMI based JMX connectors: deploy/jmx-ejb-* deploy/jmx-invoker-adaptor-server.sar deploy/jmx-rmi-adaptor.sar -- Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC manish sharan wrote: Hi, I am using jboss 3.0.7 and I

Re: [JBoss-user] question about 3.2.x docs

2003-07-11 Thread Scott M Stark
You are not reading this correctly. There is the 2.3 web.xml descriptor resource-ref which allows a res-type and there is the jboss-web.xml descriptor resource-ref which only allows either the jndi-name or res-url. The section talking about the res-type is on the standard descriptors, ejb-jar.xml

[JBoss-user] CMR, cascade-delete not-null

2003-07-11 Thread Gavin Matthews
Hi, I have a database table which has a not-null foreign key. At the moment I can't get cascade-delete to work with not-null foreign keys, JBoss is trying to update the foreign key to null. I'm using JBoss 3.2.2RC1 and I just want to confirm if this is the expected behaviour or a bug? Would it

RE: [JBoss-user] Finder performance

2003-07-11 Thread Jon Barnett
I'm thinking that the user should not see anything different on their side of things. For our tests, we have made no changes to the ECperf test code. I hope we've been careful enough so as not to impact the specs and the user aspects. However, the JBoss engine implements its internal findEntities

AW: [JBoss-user] Socket TimeOut using RMI/JNDI over HTTP--- Sorry ignore

2003-07-11 Thread Janardhan Burugupalli
Hi All, After i wrote this mail i found that my client acceses Entity beans directly and i activated http invocations only for session beans. According to designt we access all entity beans via session beans and i found a design failure in out client..thanks regards jani -Ursprüngliche