[jira] Updated: (JDO-623) Query cancel and timeout support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell updated JDO-623: Attachment: jdo623.patch Please review this patch. I found a few places in the api and tck which

[jira] Commented: (JDO-615) MetaData specification API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855264#action_12855264 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-615: - Checked in test case. svn commit -m JDO-615 Add

[jira] Commented: (JDO-661) Add JDO3 goals to top-level maven.xml

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12880663#action_12880663 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-661: - Looks good. Thanks. Add JDO3 goals to top-level

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-653) Extra checks in PMF.close tests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell resolved JDO-653. - Fix Version/s: JDO 3 Resolution: Fixed Patch applied to trunk: svn commit -m JDO-653 Thanks

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-615) MetaData specification API

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell resolved JDO-615. - Resolution: Fixed Resolved. MetaData specification API --

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-619) API required for enabling/disabling FOR UPDATE locking for SELECTs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell resolved JDO-619. - Resolution: Fixed Most of these issues have been resolved with the JDO 3.0 release. If any issues

[jira] Assigned: (JDO-664) maven jdo2-api artifact in Maven Central repository is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell reassigned JDO-664: --- Assignee: Craig L Russell maven jdo2-api artifact in Maven Central repository is broken

[jira] Resolved: (JDO-664) maven jdo2-api artifact in Maven Central repository is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell resolved JDO-664. - Fix Version/s: JDO 3 Resolution: Fixed Should be fixed. The original maven-metadata.xml for

[jira] Commented: (JDO-647) Run TCK using Maven2 for consistency

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12898298#action_12898298 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-647: - I'd like to see a diff of the pom in the api

[jira] Assigned: (JDO-64) Enhancer test cases must be adapted to JDO2.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-64?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell reassigned JDO-64: -- Assignee: Craig L Russell Enhancer test cases must be adapted to JDO2.

[jira] Commented: (JDO-660) Ability to specify positioning of field 'column(s)' in datastore table

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12916940#action_12916940 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-660: - With regard to the patch, perhaps we should just

[jira] Commented: (JDO-667) Extend PersistenceManageFactory to return all known entity classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12924687#action_12924687 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-667: - Could you write up a technical description of the

[jira] Commented: (JDO-662) Extend sequence metadata to allow specification of start and allocationSize

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12926339#action_12926339 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-662: - Looks good. Extend sequence metadata to allow

[jira] Commented: (JDO-667) Extend PersistenceManageFactory to return all known entity classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12926362#action_12926362 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-667: - Given that the JDO implementation keeps track of

[jira] Commented: (JDO-666) Provide quick reference to JDOQL as PDF download

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12926539#action_12926539 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-666: - It's great to have this available. Just a few

[jira] Assigned: (JDO-669) TCK : RelationshipManyToManyAllRelationships.testDeleteFromMappedSide - problem with check

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell reassigned JDO-669: --- Assignee: Craig L Russell TCK :

[jira] Commented: (JDO-669) TCK : RelationshipManyToManyAllRelationships.testDeleteFromMappedSide - problem with check

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12933958#action_12933958 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-669: - It's a test case bug. It's not permitted to access

[jira] Updated: (JDO-669) TCK : RelationshipManyToManyAllRelationships.testDeleteFromMappedSide - problem with check

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell updated JDO-669: Attachment: jdo-669.patch Please review this patch. It removes the ill-fated contains(deletedObject)

[jira] Commented: (JDO-669) TCK : RelationshipManyToManyAllRelationships.testDeleteFromMappedSide - problem with check

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12934906#action_12934906 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-669: - So instead of a failure you would get an error in

[jira] Commented: (JDO-643) avg return type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12970635#action_12970635 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-643: - I'd like to see this changed as well. Can someone

[jira] Commented: (JDO-667) Extend PersistenceManageFactory to return all known entity classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12971042#action_12971042 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-667: - Hi Erik, We have a permission that sounds

[jira] Commented: (JDO-643) avg return type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978512#action_12978512 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-643: - I agree. With the patch, this should now be just a

[jira] Commented: (JDO-671) Oracle spec page on JDO does not list mrel 3/JDO 3.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-671?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12978880#action_12978880 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-671: - It looks like this page was just copied from the

[jira] Commented: (JDO-673) Interface JDOEntityManagerFactory does not compile with JPA 2.0

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12988154#action_12988154 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-673: - I propose that we remove the two interfaces

[jira] Commented: (JDO-674) Support a way of defining inheritance strategy that results in a table per class with the table containing columns for all fields in the class (inc superclasses)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990652#comment-12990652 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-674: - Seems like proposal 1 is complete enough to

[jira] Commented: (JDO-677) Ability to mark a class as read-only

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13002743#comment-13002743 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-677: - So where would an error be identified? At the time

[jira] Assigned: (JDO-679) Clarify downcasts in queries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell reassigned JDO-679: --- Assignee: Craig L Russell Clarify downcasts in queries

[jira] Updated: (JDO-679) Clarify downcasts in queries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell updated JDO-679: Component/s: tck Clarify downcasts in queries Key:

[jira] Commented: (JDO-678) Ability to set properties on PersistenceManager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13005774#comment-13005774 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-678: - If I had it to do again, I'd probably return Map?,

[jira] Commented: (JDO-677) Ability to mark a class as read-only

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13008507#comment-13008507 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-677: - Nothing in the specification calls for writing to

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-652) Provision of a typesafe refactor-friendly query capability for JDOQL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040897#comment-13040897 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-652: - I like the direction of this api. My comments here

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-64) Enhancer test cases must be adapted to JDO2.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-64?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13051181#comment-13051181 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-64: I propose that we remove these test classes since

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-662) Extend sequence metadata to allow specification of start and allocationSize

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058619#comment-13058619 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-662: - Do you have a test case that can be put into the

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-658) JDOQL : Support for further methods (String, Enum, Date, JDOHelper)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058621#comment-13058621 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-658: - Is there a test case that can be put into the tck?

[jira] [Updated] (JDO-651) Modify specification to address NoSQL datastores

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell updated JDO-651: Fix Version/s: (was: JDO 3 maintenance release 1) JDO 3 maintenance release 2

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-638) Add annotations for instance callbacks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13058630#comment-13058630 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-638: - This is not yet implemented in the RI. Deferring

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-681) RI enhancer is not finding log4j properties file

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13062394#comment-13062394 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-681: - What do you mean by the root of the CLASSPATH?

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-707) Refactor JDO parent child poms

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13273414#comment-13273414 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-707: - I think the version numbers should be hard coded,

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-715) exectck will always try to install Derby schema even if derby not being run

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-715?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13287507#comment-13287507 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-715: - looks good. exectck will always

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-711) Reorganize project sources to abide by maven conventions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13408253#comment-13408253 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-711: - I agree it's not critical for 3.1. If it makes it

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-694) Automate OSGi bundling in JDO 3.1+ build

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13450795#comment-13450795 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-694: - The notation that the javax.transaction package is

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-694) Automate OSGi bundling in JDO 3.1+ build

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-694?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13455892#comment-13455892 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-694: - I think that if we verify that with this manifest,

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-660) Ability to specify positioning of field 'column(s)' in datastore table

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13474765#comment-13474765 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-660: - I've updated chapters 15, 18, and 19 to reflect

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-662) Extend sequence metadata to allow specification of start and allocationSize

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13474835#comment-13474835 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-662: - I updated the specification to incorporate these

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-667) Extend PersistenceManageFactory to return all known entity classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13474840#comment-13474840 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-667: - The following was added to Chapter 11: 11.11

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-674) Support a way of defining inheritance strategy that results in a table per class with the table containing columns for all fields in the class (inc superclasses)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13474858#comment-13474858 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-674: - Chapter 15 has been updated: 15.6 ... Another

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-678) Ability to set properties on PersistenceManager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13480074#comment-13480074 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-678: - Specification update: 12.19 Property Management

[jira] [Resolved] (JDO-660) Ability to specify positioning of field 'column(s)' in datastore table

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell resolved JDO-660. - Resolution: Fixed Ability to specify positioning of field 'column(s)' in datastore table

[jira] [Resolved] (JDO-662) Extend sequence metadata to allow specification of start and allocationSize

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell resolved JDO-662. - Resolution: Fixed Extend sequence metadata to allow specification of start and allocationSize

[jira] [Resolved] (JDO-667) Extend PersistenceManageFactory to return all known entity classes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-667?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell resolved JDO-667. - Resolution: Fixed Extend PersistenceManageFactory to return all known entity classes

[jira] [Resolved] (JDO-674) Support a way of defining inheritance strategy that results in a table per class with the table containing columns for all fields in the class (inc superclasses)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-674?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell resolved JDO-674. - Resolution: Fixed Support a way of defining inheritance strategy that results in a table per

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-702) Support for specification of embedded inherited objects

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13485016#comment-13485016 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-702: - The specification update for this feature is

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-678) Ability to set properties on PersistenceManager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13485035#comment-13485035 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-678: - Let's see about making a test case for this.

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-702) Support for specification of embedded inherited objects

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13485065#comment-13485065 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-702: - A bit more descriptive for Chapter 18: The

[jira] [Resolved] (JDO-702) Support for specification of embedded inherited objects

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell resolved JDO-702. - Resolution: Fixed Support for specification of embedded inherited objects

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-678) Ability to set properties on PersistenceManager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13571389#comment-13571389 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-678: - I agree that setting properties should allow

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-678) Ability to set properties on PersistenceManager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13612271#comment-13612271 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-678: - Now using DataNucleus 3.2, the persistence manager

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-721) Specifying NULL elements positioning in ordered columns

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13660879#comment-13660879 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-721: - I agree that it would be useful to have an

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-720) Possible time zone issue in SupportedDateMethods

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13665875#comment-13665875 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-720: - I applied the patch and ran the tck. Only two

[jira] [Updated] (JDO-678) Ability to set properties on PersistenceManager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell updated JDO-678: Attachment: getProperties.patch update patch with new assertions Ability to set

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-678) Ability to set properties on PersistenceManager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13700431#comment-13700431 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-678: - 12.19 Property Management The operation of a

[jira] [Updated] (JDO-678) Ability to set properties on PersistenceManager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell updated JDO-678: Attachment: AppK-StandardOptionNames.pdf Proposed Appendix K Ability to set

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JDO-678) Ability to set properties on PersistenceManager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13714295#comment-13714295 ] Craig L Russell edited comment on JDO-678 at 7/20/13 1:40 AM: --

[jira] [Updated] (JDO-721) Specifying NULL elements positioning in ordered columns

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell updated JDO-721: Fix Version/s: JDO 3 maintenance release 2 (3.2) Specifying NULL elements positioning in ordered

[jira] [Resolved] (JDO-678) Ability to set properties on PersistenceManager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell resolved JDO-678. - Resolution: Fixed Ability to set properties on PersistenceManager

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-728) extention element for @Index annotation is needed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867962#comment-13867962 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-728: - I think this is a great idea. Anyone want to

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-724) Move to using JPA2.1 API jar in TCK

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13867984#comment-13867984 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-724: - This seems to be a good change. The 3.1 release is

[jira] [Updated] (JDO-728) extension element for @Index annotation is needed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell updated JDO-728: Summary: extension element for @Index annotation is needed. (was: extention element for @Index

[jira] [Updated] (JDO-728) extension element for @Index, @ForeignKey, @Unique, @PrimaryKey annotations are needed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell updated JDO-728: Summary: extension element for @Index, @ForeignKey, @Unique, @PrimaryKey annotations are needed.

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-728) extension element for @Index, @ForeignKey, @Unique, @PrimaryKey annotations are needed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13874958#comment-13874958 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-728: - Don't we need a test case for this? extension

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-728) extension element for @Index, @ForeignKey, @Unique, @PrimaryKey annotations are needed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13875112#comment-13875112 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-728: - @Andy: Right. I was thinking of the extension in

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-625) Support for streams

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13881130#comment-13881130 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-625: - We could define a JDO persistent type that has

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-712) Require using the PMF schema definition with sequence names

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13881144#comment-13881144 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-712: - To test that the annotation is properly defined,

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-728) extension element for @Index, @ForeignKey, @Unique, @PrimaryKey annotations are needed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13901651#comment-13901651 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-728: - To test that the annotation is properly defined,

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (JDO-712) Require using the PMF schema definition with sequence names

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell updated JDO-712: Comment: was deleted (was: To test that the annotation is properly defined, we just need to add a

[jira] [Created] (JDO-729) Merge 3.1-rc1 changes back to trunk

Craig L Russell created JDO-729: --- Summary: Merge 3.1-rc1 changes back to trunk Key: JDO-729 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-729 Project: JDO Issue Type: Task

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-729) Merge 3.1-rc1 changes back to trunk

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13943239#comment-13943239 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-729: - Looks good on review. Merge 3.1-rc1 changes

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-589) Allow makePersistent outside a transaction

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14013896#comment-14013896 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-589: - This JIRA specifies an extended persistence

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-728) extension element for @Index, @ForeignKey, @Unique, @PrimaryKey annotations are needed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14020012#comment-14020012 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-728: - I checked in the changes to the specification

[jira] [Resolved] (JDO-728) extension element for @Index, @ForeignKey, @Unique, @PrimaryKey annotations are needed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell resolved JDO-728. - Resolution: Fixed extension element for @Index, @ForeignKey, @Unique, @PrimaryKey annotations

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-728) extension element for @Index, @ForeignKey, @Unique, @PrimaryKey annotations are needed.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14030794#comment-14030794 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-728: - Updated the specification with 1602464.

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-731) Warnings when buildung exectck

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-731?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14045400#comment-14045400 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-731: - Looks good. Warnings when buildung exectck

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-589) Allow makePersistent outside a transaction

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14046131#comment-14046131 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-589: - Here is a proposal for handling both semantics.

[jira] [Assigned] (JDO-732) No KEYS file; download page link is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell reassigned JDO-732: --- Assignee: Craig L Russell No KEYS file; download page link is broken

[jira] [Resolved] (JDO-732) No KEYS file; download page link is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell resolved JDO-732. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed. The KEYS file is checked into the svnpubsub directory. Adding

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-730) Creating the innerjoin without relationship between objects

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14058996#comment-14058996 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-730: - Using a variable to identify the second table

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-650) Support for conditional operator ? : in JDOQL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14059006#comment-14059006 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-650: - For my money, the following is pretty clear:

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-589) Allow makePersistent outside a transaction

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14098729#comment-14098729 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-589: - We could simply allow the NonTransactionalWrite

[jira] [Updated] (JDO-589) Allow makePersistent and deletePersistent outside a transaction

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell updated JDO-589: Summary: Allow makePersistent and deletePersistent outside a transaction (was: Allow makePersistent

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-650) Support for conditional operator ? : in JDOQL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14115482#comment-14115482 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-650: - We have three choices to implement this

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-589) Allow makePersistent and deletePersistent outside a transaction

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14131728#comment-14131728 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-589: - I'd prefer the second option: adding a new

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-721) Specifying NULL elements positioning in ordered columns

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14175206#comment-14175206 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-721: - followed by one of the following words:

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-721) Specifying NULL elements positioning in ordered columns

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14175214#comment-14175214 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-721: - The patch looks good. Specifying NULL elements

[jira] [Updated] (JDO-650) Support for conditional operator ? : in JDOQL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Craig L Russell updated JDO-650: Description: JDOQL should support the Java conditional operator ? :, e.g. salary = 1000.0 ? salary :

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-650) Support for conditional operator ? : in JDOQL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14221156#comment-14221156 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-650: - Proposed specification update for Chapter 14:

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-650) Support for conditional operator ? : in JDOQL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14280535#comment-14280535 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-650: - @mbo I agree. Support for conditional operator

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-734) Ability to save a (created) query as a named query for later use

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14511327#comment-14511327 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-734: - How do we avoid applications fighting over the

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-709) Standardize field/property converters

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14511326#comment-14511326 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-709: - I think we need an example of how the Converter

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-737) Change Query API to be fluent

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14511337#comment-14511337 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-737: - I agree option 1 is preferable. I agree that we

[jira] [Commented] (JDO-687) Remove deprecated methods from PersistenceManager, DataStoreCache

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14519941#comment-14519941 ] Craig L Russell commented on JDO-687: - LGTM Remove deprecated methods from

  1   2   3   4   >