Please note that I never intended to say that RIF core is RuleML (still
can't see where that could be mixed up). My apologies if I did.
For the translation between RIF core and both production systems: I
thought I'd start there, so far so good. Admittedly the rules I
experimented with could be
On 30/08/2010, p...@agh.edu.pl p...@agh.edu.pl wrote:
Please note that I never intended to say that RIF core is RuleML (still
can't see where that could be mixed up). My apologies if I did.
My remark was not directed at anything specifically, its a general
statement. Sorry!
-W
For the
[mailto:owner-jess-us...@sandia.gov]
On Behalf Of Donald Winston
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 9:43 AM
To: Jess-users
Subject: JESS: Rule Translators?
What's the possibility of some sort of rule translator for Jess. One
of the reasons for using a rule engine in a typical business app
Hi,
I'm currently working on a common interface for multi-rule-engine
distributed systems. Part of my work has so far been to develop XSLTs to
allow RIF core (W3C spec) translations to and from JessML. DroolsML is also
supported so it's possible to exchange rules between Jess and Drools
through
What's the possibility of some sort of rule translator for Jess. One of the
reasons for using a rule engine in a typical business app is to separate the
business rules from the rest of the application so non programmers can work
with the rules. (Although in my experience we end up with
Be careful to distinguish RuleML, which is a proposed standard rule
language, from JessML, which is an XML-based rule format natively
supported by Jess. The point of JessML, really, is that it's easier to
manipulate XML than the Lisp-like Jess rule language in code, so if
you want to write
