Yea, asserting before defining the rule definitely has a tendency to
make things confusing...
On Aug 24, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Jason Morris wrote:
Hi Hal,
Clean up your code a bit, and I think it works fine. :-)
; hal.clp
(clear)
(watch all)
(deftemplate functional-fact
(slot func))
I would like to have functions contained in the slot value of a fact
and then apply them. I can create and assign the function values by
using (lambda ...), which seems to be what I'm looking for on that
side of the equation:
(deftemplate functional-fact
(slot func)
)
(assert
if I understand what you're trying to do, you will need to use method
cal in the test pattern like
the catch is function-fact.func needs to return boolean true/false if
you want to use it in the LHS.
peter
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Hal Hildebrand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like
Hi Hal,
Clean up your code a bit, and I think it works fine. :-)
; hal.clp
(clear)
(watch all)
(deftemplate functional-fact
(slot func))
(defrule test-me
(functional-fact (func ?function))
(test (?function 0))
=
(printout t 1 0 crlf))
; PROGRAM
(reset)
(assert
