How to handle CVS $Revision$ tags in merges (was: ban on code formatting when release branch is active)

2004-07-04 Thread Sebastian Bazley
3:14 AM Subject: Re: ban on code formatting when release branch is active I was thinking partly of Javadoc, also when source files are packaged up in jars etc. It can be useful to know which version of a source file is present (e.g. if one knows that a bug was fixed in version x); without

ban on code formatting when release branch is active

2004-06-19 Thread Michael Stover
Ugh, I hereby ban any use of auto code formatting tools when there's an active release branch that I have to merge into main. I also ban cvs header tags inside of files. We don't use them and they also make merges tedious. -- Michael Stover [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Software Foundation

Re: ban on code formatting when release branch is active

2004-06-19 Thread Sebastian Bazley
, and thus make the merge job easier. Do you use Eclipse for difference checking? S. - Original Message - From: Michael Stover [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 2:13 AM Subject: ban on code formatting when release branch is active Ugh, I hereby ban any

Re: ban on code formatting when release branch is active

2004-06-19 Thread Michael Stover
Eclipse for difference checking? S. - Original Message - From: Michael Stover [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 2:13 AM Subject: ban on code formatting when release branch is active Ugh, I hereby ban any use of auto code formatting tools when

Re: ban on code formatting when release branch is active

2004-06-19 Thread Sebastian Bazley
investigation tomorrow - surely there must be a solution to this. Sebastian - Original Message - From: Michael Stover [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: JMeter Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 2:30 AM Subject: Re: ban on code formatting when release branch is active Yes, $Header

Re: Code formatting

2003-08-26 Thread Jordi Salvat i Alabart
Absolutely agree. Just before code freeze prior to each release, maybe? -- Salut, Jordi. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not that I want to extend a discussion on code formatting standards longer than I have to, but... It might be best to disallow code formatting via programmatic means (ie, hitting

Re: Code formatting

2003-08-25 Thread Jeremy Arnold
Hello, It looks like people were generally in favor of bumping up the 80 column width limit, but we didn't really make a decision. It can be rather difficult to come to an agreement when we are dealing with a sliding scale (80 columns? 100? 120? Personally I prefer 117.5.) So let's

Re: Code formatting

2003-08-25 Thread Jordi Salvat i Alabart
Jordi Salvat i Alabart: -0 ...because the nice thing about standards is that if you don't like any of the ones out there you can always create your own... (the sentence is not mine, but I can't remember the author, sorry Mr/Ms. author). -- Salut, Jordi. Jeremy Arnold wrote: Hello, It looks

Re: Code formatting

2003-08-25 Thread mstover1
Not that I want to extend a discussion on code formatting standards longer than I have to, but... It might be best to disallow code formatting via programmatic means (ie, hitting ctrl-shift-F in Eclipse or using pretty printers). The reason is that no matter what standards you decide

Re: Code formatting

2003-08-18 Thread peter lin
, Jeremy Arnold wrote: Hello, Back in January, the JMeter committers agreed to use the Jakarta-Turbine conventions for code formatting (http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/common/code-standards.html). Not my personal favorite, but I'm not picky as long as there is some kind of convention

Re: Code formatting

2003-08-17 Thread mstover1
vertical and horizontal space. What do people say? Who out there needs an 80 column max? Can people go to 120 or higher? -Mike On 16 Aug 2003 at 20:39, Jeremy Arnold wrote: Hello, Back in January, the JMeter committers agreed to use the Jakarta-Turbine conventions for code formatting