RE: Parser refactoring - what next?

2003-11-25 Thread peter lin
I have no preference either way. a factory would be nice. peter BAZLEY, Sebastian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The reason I suggested a factory might be useful is that some parsers might be shareable, and some might not. Using a constructor to acquire a parser makes it more difficult to share

Re: Parser refactoring - what next?

2003-11-25 Thread peter lin
sounds great. If I'm lucky, I might be able to spend 2-3 hours over the holiday weekend to debug htmlparser :) peter Jordi Salvat i Alabart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I had a long network outage today, so I used my (otherwise pretty idle) time to do that refactoring. Added a factory

RE: Parser refactoring - what next?

2003-11-25 Thread BAZLEY, Sebastian
-Original Message- From: Jordi Salvat i Alabart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 November 2003 15:43 To: JMeter Developers List Subject: Re: Parser refactoring - what next? Sorry, I had a long network outage today, so I used my (otherwise pretty idle) time to do

RE: Parser refactoring - what next?

2003-11-25 Thread BAZLEY, Sebastian
-Original Message- From: BAZLEY, Sebastian Sent: 25 November 2003 16:00 To: 'JMeter Developers List' Subject: RE: Parser refactoring - what next? -Original Message- From: Jordi Salvat i Alabart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 November 2003 15:43 To: JMeter