Re: [Jmol-users] unexpected image scaling

2008-08-27 Thread Robert Hanson
yes, absolutely you must use the latest version if you are using any RC at all. On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Thomas Stout [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: I have a stripped down Jmol implementation that I am using for debugging. It contains nothing but the applet: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC

[Jmol-users] Angel's book

2008-08-27 Thread Jennifer L. Muzyka
I finally had a chance to read Angel's book on Jmol. I learned a lot, and now I'm wondering when volume 2 might be available. -Jennifer Jennifer Muzyka Professor of Chemistry On sabbatical at University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy Centre College Danville, KY 40422 [EMAIL

Re: [Jmol-users] changing atom coordinates with {selected}.y

2008-08-27 Thread Robert Hanson
thanks for finding that, Angel. It's fixed for 11.6.RC11. Those files should be available as http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/docs/examples-11/Jmol-11_5.zip shortly Bob On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Angel Herráez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all I had this script for getting a

Re: [Jmol-users] Echo with sub and sup tags

2008-08-27 Thread Angel Herráez
Hi Dean Yes. I have used sub in echos, although not often. I have a recent example using 11.5.41. My echo is Hsub2/subO Maybe your problem is only with long subscripted texts? - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin

Re: [Jmol-users] Drawing individual symmetry elements

2008-08-27 Thread Robert Hanson
It's a bug I need to fix. Don't go back to RC9 -- that's broken for drawing pointgroups the second time. It's a problem with the caching I added in RC10. Jmol doesn't recalculate the point group or the draw set if it finds suitable ones already present. But I forgot to check for that axis number.

Re: [Jmol-users] Testing 11.6.RC8

2008-08-27 Thread Robert Hanson
Dean, that fix is checked in -- problem for any case where there is no principal axis. On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Dean Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: OK, it's working much better, but a few obscure errors with my test set (this is with both 11.6.RC10-applet, and

Re: [Jmol-users] Echo with sub and sup tags

2008-08-27 Thread Dean Johnston
OK, here is the state for ammonia, with a label of Point Group = Csub3v/sub at the bottom left. Without the tags the spacing is normal. Dean # Jmol state version 11.6.RC11_dev 2008-08-14 16:55; # fullName = jmolApplet0__163573001520736__; # documentBase =

[Jmol-users] problem in firefox

2008-08-27 Thread Jeff Hansen
My apologies. This is really more of a javascript/html question but it is on a Jmol project I am working on. Could someone explain to me what is the problem with the following code? The appletReady() function works just fine in Safari and the page validates as HTML 4.01 strict, but the

Re: [Jmol-users] problem in firefox

2008-08-27 Thread Dean Johnston
Jeff, No apologies needed. Giving an id to a div does not create a Javascript object automatically (at least in Firefox). You will have to use something like: var myText = document.getElementById('jmolText'); and then say myText.value = dump(_dataInfo); It's interesting that it *does*

Re: [Jmol-users] Echo with sub and sup tags

2008-08-27 Thread Angel Herráez
On 27 Aug 2008 at 10:57, Dean Johnston wrote: OK, here is the state for ammonia, with a label of Point Group = Csub3v/sub at the bottom left. Without the tags the spacing is normal. Just typing it in the console of 11.6.RC10 app it looks Ok to me Maybe some combination with other scripts are

Re: [Jmol-users] problem in firefox

2008-08-27 Thread Angel Herráez
Hi Jeff The key must be in the dump() function, I'd say You are trying to write an array into a text area. I guess different browsers may take that differently, unless you force the array to become a string. Or, how about calling jmolText fully? document.getElementById(jmolText).value =

Re: [Jmol-users] problem in firefox

2008-08-27 Thread Robert Hanson
Right -- name attribute is quite problematical. In some browsers id is accessible as name, but that's not acceptable. And in some browser versions the name of an element in a form is under the form name rather than the document. Always use id and, as Dean points out, then access it only using

Re: [Jmol-users] problem in firefox

2008-08-27 Thread Jeff Hansen
Dean, Yeah, I thought of that and tried it, but that didn't work either. In that case Firebug reports that getElementById is not defined. So it seems for some reason Firefox isn't recognizing the textarea's id. Incidentally, I get a similar error when I try the same with the textDiv

Re: [Jmol-users] unexpected image scaling

2008-08-27 Thread Thomas Stout
So, just to be thorough: it still does it for me in version 11.6RC10. I've tested Firefox 3.0 on linux, Firefox 3.0.1 on WinXP, IE on WinXP and Safari on WinXP -- all behave similarly. Turning on and off set antialiasdisplay does appear to be the trigger -Tom Here's a state dump: # Jmol

Re: [Jmol-users] Echo with sub and sup tags

2008-08-27 Thread Dean Johnston
Found it! It's an artifact of the set antialiasDisplay (true). (It only appears unusual when a sub or sup tag it present *and* antialiasDisplay is on.) I'll leave it to Bob to track *that* one down... Dean On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Angel Herráez [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: On 27 Aug

Re: [Jmol-users] Echo with sub and sup tags

2008-08-27 Thread Robert Hanson
that's what I needed. Fixed. Vertical was off as well. On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:56 AM, Angel Herráez [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: On 27 Aug 2008 at 10:57, Dean Johnston wrote: OK, here is the state for ammonia, with a label of Point Group = Csub3v/sub at the bottom left. Without the tags the

Re: [Jmol-users] unexpected image scaling

2008-08-27 Thread Robert Hanson
Thanks. [States as attachments would be better] That's fixed for 11.6.RC11. On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Thomas Stout [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: I have a stripped down Jmol implementation that I am using for debugging. It contains nothing but the applet: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD

Re: [Jmol-users] problem in firefox

2008-08-27 Thread Rolf Huehne
Jeff, it looks as if there would be some kind of timing problem. With the version I got from your URL it sometimes works with Firefox 2.0.0.16 on Linux and sometimes not. === function appletReady() { var _dataInfo = jmolGetPropertyAsArray(auxiliaryInfo); var

Re: [Jmol-users] problem in firefox

2008-08-27 Thread Jeff Hansen
Thanks. Bob. Using document.getElementById('jmolText'); worked. Thanks for sharing your .js file as well. I'll probably take a look at it at some point. I'm working towards my own at this point and I'm afraid looking at yours will just prevent my learning how to do it myself.

Re: [Jmol-users] problem in firefox

2008-08-27 Thread Robert Hanson
I'm working towards my own at this point and I'm afraid looking at yours will just prevent my learning how to do it myself. Shame! NEVER say that! The way to learn this is by adapting anything you can find. That's the great thing about JavaScript. Learn how these code fragments work by testing

Re: [Jmol-users] problem in firefox

2008-08-27 Thread Jeff Hansen
Believe me I've been doing plenty of that, but I also have been finding trial and error to be very instructive too. I did take a look at your divs.js file. I don't yet understand all of it. I tried your divFind and divWrite functions and I'm pretty sure I'm understanding what they do.

[Jmol-users] Hack to deal with Firefox 3 new behaviour regarding Files Input

2008-08-27 Thread Paul Pillot
This one might also be regarded as off topic, but as some you might be stuck with the same problem, I thought it might be worth to share. The issue is that starting from firefox 3.0, when using an input file element in a form, you can't access to the full path of the file chosen by the user,

Re: [Jmol-users] Hack to deal with Firefox 3 new behaviour regarding Files Input

2008-08-27 Thread Robert Hanson
yes, thanks, Paul, that's right. It's an interesting compromise. I had to abandon the type=file in Jmol Protein Explorer for FireFox3 because of that. If you can't get the actual path to the file, which I think is actually a good security feature, you can't later reproduce the state, unless you

Re: [Jmol-users] problem in firefox

2008-08-27 Thread Robert Hanson
My experience is the appendChild is overkill for what you generally need. Just make sure you have jmolSetDocument(0) and then the applet you get from var x = jmolApplet(.) can be inserted into any div. HOWEVER, as I recall there are problems with some browsers not being able to communicate