Yes, that seems to be our issue. So we need to redo the state scripts.
Thanks
On 13 Jan 2017 at 18:07, Robert Hanson wrote:
Ah, yes! bonds are indexed COMPLETELY differently -- and are not even the same
set of
bonds -- in PDB, mmCIF, and MMTF.
---
El software de antivirus Avast ha
Ah, yes! bonds are indexed COMPLETELY differently -- and are not even the
same set of bonds -- in PDB, mmCIF, and MMTF.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Robert Hanson wrote:
> This works fine:
>
> load $caffeine
> select bonds ({0 3 4})
> color bonds yellow
>
> so that
This works fine:
load $caffeine
select bonds ({0 3 4})
color bonds yellow
so that syntax is fine. What can happen with old files, particularly from
PDB, is that the underlying file may have changed in such a way that that
bonds are in different orders. (Or, Jmol is reading the file slightly
Thank you, Matt
Further testing indicates that he command itself is working as it used to be.
Suspicion is now on a possible change in the way bonds are indexed,
between old PDB files and recent mmCIF files
(this is in Proteopedia which changed the source of files last year)
---
El software
Looks like a bug to me. Will get back to you.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Kubasik, Matthew A. <
mkuba...@fairfield.edu> wrote:
> Angel,
>
> I am unfamiliar with the syntax you are using.
>
> However, placing the bonds into a variable has worked for me, as in:
>
> select {oxygen and
Angel,
I am unfamiliar with the syntax you are using.
However, placing the bonds into a variable has worked for me, as in:
select {oxygen and connected(1) and connected(carbon)} or {carbon and
(connected(oxygen))}
x1={selected}.bonds
select x1
bondorder 2
select none
I use the above code to
6 matches
Mail list logo