Re: [Jmol-users] frame [array of models]?

2008-09-25 Thread Angel Herraez
El 24 Sep 2008 a las 21:17, rob yang escribió: Hmm, that does the trick. What if I want to animate only selected models too? I'm quite sure that there are options for choosing the frame range involved in animation. Check the doc. But maybe not possible for non- contiguous frames.

Re: [Jmol-users] frame [array of models]?

2008-09-25 Thread Angel Herraez
(following my previous post) Rob, You could also try to **delete** the unwanted frames (I think it's done with a variant of ZAP) then play the animation - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move

Re: [Jmol-users] Browser Crahes While Loading Jmol

2008-09-25 Thread Angel Herraez
Hi Vinu El 25 Sep 2008 a las 12:31, vinu manikandan escribió: I had mailed the Jmol users blog couple of times, may be i was not clear in my question that's why ididn'tget any answers. Maybe. Anyway, the list is so active that sometimes messages just drop down too quickly. Don't hesitate to

Re: [Jmol-users] Browser Crahes While Loading Jmol

2008-09-25 Thread Angel Herraez
Vinu manikandan wrote: Sir I restructured the program in such away that the different values are provided in the same page for example 1)1-55, 2)100- 120, 3)130-140 and I want to select these regions in the Jmol with out loading the protein structure again and again on the PDB Structure

Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated

2008-09-25 Thread Robert Hanson
also, you can add parameters like that as though they were callbacks: jmolInitialize(./, JmolApplet.jar) jmolSetCallback(draggable, true) jmolApplet(400) On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:31 AM, Angel Herraez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Re: draggable applet Here is a partial copy of my previous post (4

Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated

2008-09-25 Thread Thomas Stout
That sounds like a good explanation, but unfortunately I had the same problem on both WinXP and linux I also cleared the FF cache on both platforms (in addition to re-starting FF and also re-starting the computer (WinXP). I may go back and try it again, but like I said, I'm happily using the

Re: [Jmol-users] frame [array of models]?

2008-09-25 Thread Robert Hanson
ooh, yes, that's a neat option. zap 1.2,1.4,1.6,1.8 etc. Note that the original frame designations don't change. After this frame 1.3 is still frame 1.3. But if you try to go to frame 1.4, then you just get all frames because frame 1.4 no longer exists. Bob On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:24 AM,

Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated

2008-09-25 Thread Robert Hanson
It's the Java cache. On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Thomas Stout [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: That sounds like a good explanation, but unfortunately I had the same problem on both WinXP and linux I also cleared the FF cache on both platforms (in addition to re-starting FF and also re-starting

Re: [Jmol-users] final testing appreciated

2008-09-25 Thread Angel Herraez
Just found this (well, not me, Google of course): Clearing Java cache on Linux, Mac, Windows: http://www.uwplatt.edu/oit/howto/java-cache.html - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge

Re: [Jmol-users] Issues with FireFox on MacOS...that's odd...

2008-09-25 Thread Robert Hanson
signed applet! :) On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Jonathan Gutow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rob, Even with this plugin there is a problem if you access files locally on your computer. FF appears to pass absolute paths to files rather than relative. This causes security errors when

[Jmol-users] ff3 vs safari.. again.. load

2008-09-25 Thread rob yang
Hi all, So here's something new that's confusing me. I am loading a multi-structure mol2 file. That's as simple as it gets, right? That's what I thought too till safari spoke. In Firefox3, the molecule loads no problem. In safari, it doesn't.. *unless* I put in an alert message right before

Re: [Jmol-users] ff3 vs safari.. again.. load

2008-09-25 Thread Robert Hanson
no kidding! What's firing the loadLigands() function? A button? A callback (that could be the problem -- not good to run jmolScript from a callback on some platforms, I think). Try using setTimeout(loadLigands(''),100) in whatever call is doing that. I know the quotes are pain there. You

[Jmol-users] State script bug re: cavity

2008-09-25 Thread Eric Martz
Dear Bob, The following appears to me to be a bug in Jmol 11.6.RC12 that prevents a cavity from being displayed from a state script. I have not spent the time to test it in 11.6.RC16 because I doubt it has been fixed there (but I stand ready to be corrected). Go to

Re: [Jmol-users] State script bug re: cavity

2008-09-25 Thread Robert Hanson
Oy. Thanks, Eric. Turns out there are a couple of issues here -- calculate surfacedistance as well as set antialiasdisplay. ARGH. OK, I will get that fixed. I don't think it has anything to do with the cavity business, actually. On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Eric Martz [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:

[Jmol-users] set backgroundModel filemodel

2008-09-25 Thread rob yang
Hi all, I am loading 2 separate files. The 1st file contains 1 structure, and the 2nd file contains multi-models. In an animation, I'd like to keep the structure in the 1st file constant in the background, while playing through the models in the 2nd file. I am loading the 1st file first, then

Re: [Jmol-users] set backgroundModel filemodel

2008-09-25 Thread Angel Herráez
Rob, the file.model is numeric. So, if you do load f1.pdb load append f2.pdb (or the same, load files f1.pdb f2.pdb ) then you need set backgroundModel 1.1 - This SF.Net email is sponsored by

Re: [Jmol-users] State script bug re: cavity

2008-09-25 Thread Robert Hanson
OK. That's fixed. Eric, if you want to try the fix right away, grab the files from * http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/docs/examples-11/Jmol-11_5.zip* the version is 11.6.RC17_dev Bob On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Robert Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oy. Thanks, Eric. Turns out there

Re: [Jmol-users] projection bug

2008-09-25 Thread Robert Hanson
please provide a Jmol state file and structure file that clearly demonstrates this. On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Victor Chest [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi all, There is some problem with projection of bounded atoms of same type on screen in version 11.6 RC16 (there is no this bug in