I wonder if it is worth noting somewhere more prominant specifically that
Jmol does not use semantic versioning. This seems to be confusing for many
developers.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Mark Williamson wrote:
>
>
> On 24/10/16 18:22, Robert Hanson wrote:
> > It actually
On 24/10/16 18:22, Robert Hanson wrote:
> It actually is not metadata. Different releases include the extension of
> date:
>
> 14.6.4_2016.10.30
>
> is not the same version as
>
> 14.6.4_2016.10.22
>
> Sorry if that breaks a convention.
>
Ah, OK. Apologies; I misunderstood. Please ignore my
It actually is not metadata. Different releases include the extension of
date:
14.6.4_2016.10.30
is not the same version as
14.6.4_2016.10.22
Sorry if that breaks a convention.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Mark Williamson wrote:
> On 26/08/16 13:39, Robert Hanson wrote:
On 26/08/16 13:39, Robert Hanson wrote:
> Excellent! Thanks, Nico, Spencer, and Mark.
>
Dear Spencer, Nico and Bob,
It is great to see the 14.x Jmol artefacts being deployed to Maven central:
http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22net.sourceforge.jmol%22%20AND%20a%3A%22jmol%22
Currently I need to do the release. Theoretically this should be doable
automatically, but ant isn't that well supported anymore and I was unable
to figure out the configuration yet.
Bob, I do think it would be a good idea for you to make a sonatype account
Excellent! Thanks, Nico, Spencer, and Mark.
When I update Jmol to new subversions, will this somehow happen
automatically, or does Mark or Spencer need to watch out for that and do
something?
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Mark Williamson wrote:
> On 25/08/16 16:10, Spencer
On 25/08/16 16:10, Spencer Bliven wrote:
> 14.6.1_2016.08.20 is released! At least that's what it says on OSS. It's
> not yet showing up in maven central, but I think it might just takes a
> few hours to sync.
>
> Mark, thanks so much for sharing your build notes! They were essential
Dear
14.6.1_2016.08.20 is released! At least that's what it says on OSS. It's
not yet showing up in maven central, but I think it might just takes a few
hours to sync.
Mark, thanks so much for sharing your build notes! They were essential to
me. I will add a few more notes for future reference:
>
Thanks a lot, Nico!
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Nicolas Vervelle
wrote:
> Ok,
>
> I've added a comment to request access for you.
> https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH-3633?
> focusedCommentId=369327=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.
>
Ok,
I've added a comment to request access for you.
https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH-3633?focusedCommentId=369327=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-369327
Nico
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Spencer Bliven
wrote:
> I
I volunteer to push releases to maven central. My OSS username is sbliven.
To authorize someone, I believe that it is sufficient to add a comment to
your OSS project ticket (https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OSSRH-3633)
requesting access for the username.
-Spencer
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:55
not aware of any volunteers.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Spencer Bliven
wrote:
> I just wanted to bump this thread. Any chance of getting a new maven
> maintainer added soon?
>
> Cheers,
> Spencer
>
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Spencer Bliven
I just wanted to bump this thread. Any chance of getting a new maven
maintainer added soon?
Cheers,
Spencer
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Spencer Bliven
wrote:
> So I guess the next step that needs to happen is for Nico to request that
> Mark get added to the OSS
So I guess the next step that needs to happen is for Nico to request that
Mark get added to the OSS ticket. I haven't been an active Jmol
contributor, but I'd be happy to help with maintaining the maven package if
you want to add me too (OSS user sbliven).
-Spencer
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 11:29
all checked in.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 3:09 AM, Spencer Bliven
wrote:
> Awesome. BioJava has good mmtf support, so if we can get the new Jmol
> release into maven then MMTF might be a good exchange format for passing
> structures to Jmol. We're currently stuck with
Awesome. BioJava has good mmtf support, so if we can get the new Jmol
release into maven then MMTF might be a good exchange format for passing
structures to Jmol. We're currently stuck with using PDB and are hurting
from the limitations (e.g. on chain identifiers & number of atoms).
-Spencer
On
Hey,
I also took a crack at getting the dist-release command to complete, since
it would be extremely nice to get BioJava using a more recent version of
Jmol. Using the latest trunk I got all steps to complete by modifying tools/
jmol-sonatype.xml as you suggest to refer to
I'm not sure how ${Jmol.properties.___JmolVersion} would be the version
number. In Build.xml it is:
So you are missing that regex process.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Mark Williamson wrote:
> On 17/05/16 23:15, Robert Hanson wrote:
> > Will be checking in Jmol
On 17/05/16 23:15, Robert Hanson wrote:
> Will be checking in Jmol 14.6 release as soon as I can. But it's not a
Maven release. Someone else has to do that.
Sorry for the delay in replying. I have been attempting to use the ant
build script, tools/jmol-sonatype.xml, to build some artifacts for
Will be checking in Jmol 14.6 release as soon as I can. But it's not a
Maven release. Someone else has to do that.
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Spencer Bliven
wrote:
> We at Biojava are quite interested in getting a more recent version of
> Jmol on maven, so I
Hi Mark,
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Mark Williamson wrote:
> On 31/12/15 13:46, Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > I'm probably the one who deployed the old version a long time ago (or
> > Bob, not sure).
> > I'm currently way too busy on various matters to keep
On 31/12/15 13:46, Nicolas Vervelle wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I'm probably the one who deployed the old version a long time ago (or
> Bob, not sure).
> I'm currently way too busy on various matters to keep doing releases for
> Jmol.
>
> I think having a volunteer to deal with releases on Maven central
Hi Mark,
I'm probably the one who deployed the old version a long time ago (or Bob,
not sure).
I'm currently way too busy on various matters to keep doing releases for
Jmol.
I think having a volunteer to deal with releases on Maven central would be
very helpful. Anyone interested ?
There are
Dear Jmol users,
I see that there is a version of Jmol on Maven central:
http://search.maven.org/#search|ga|1|jmol
However the latest version here is around 13. I was wondering if the
person who deployed this is on this list and if it would be possible for
that person to deploy a more
24 matches
Mail list logo