-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 28/10/12 02:02, Frederik Ramm wrote:
On 27.10.2012 15:14, colliar wrote:
Hey
I do not see any reason for deleting the source
Maybe it was indeed an overreaction on my part to remove the source from
SVN. Of course it is still accessible
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 20/10/12 23:22, Russell Edwards wrote:
My 0.02 on this storm in a teacup.
Isn't all of this one of the key points about open source software?
The source is open. Ordinary users can place a degree of trust in it
because others in the
Hi,
On 27.10.2012 15:14, colliar wrote:
I do not see any reason for deleting the source
Maybe it was indeed an overreaction on my part to remove the source from
SVN. Of course it is still accessible even if removed, but I have now
reinstated it.
I am however adamant that removing the
On 10/19/2012 10:36 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Someone noticed that there is a plugin called no more mapping which
claims to stop JOSM from working forever.
The plugin has been added to SVN by user zverik and it seems to be a
relatively harmless prank. I don't know the motivation but if the
On Fri, 19 Oct 2012, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Someone noticed that there is a plugin called no more mapping which claims
to stop JOSM from working forever.
The plugin has been added to SVN by user zverik and it seems to be a
relatively harmless prank. I don't know the motivation but if the
Hi,
On 10/20/2012 03:51 PM, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
I've seen and checked it and considered it relatively harmless :-) Not
useful, but also not dangerous.
It is certainly not dangerous. But it only took a day on talk-de for
someone to suggest that the next plugin is probably going to be upload
2012/10/20 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
There is a market for editors out there, and our editor, JOSM, is one of
the products. We are in friendly competition with other editors and we
want to make our editor the best one, at least I think we do
.
I can already see the snarky Twitter
On Sat, 20 Oct 2012, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I've seen and checked it and considered it relatively harmless :-) Not
useful, but also not dangerous.
It is certainly not dangerous. But it only took a day on talk-de for someone
to suggest that the next plugin is probably going to be upload your
On 10/20/2012 03:35 PM, Ilya Zverev wrote:
Hi. Paul got it right, I've made this plugin just because there has to
be an option. It even counted days without mapping. My record is a week.
As for installing without reading, I've made all the precautions
possible. There was a big warning in plugin
My 0.02 on this storm in a teacup.
Isn't all of this one of the key points about open source software?
The source is open. Ordinary users can place a degree of trust in it
because others in the community will review code for safety. And that's
exactly what we've just seen on this list. Any
10 matches
Mail list logo
