Re: [josm-dev] WMSPlugin Update

2010-09-01 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, Ian Dees wrote: I've made some changes to the wmsplugin so that discovering available layers at a particular WMS URL is a lot easier. What's the best way to have people test this and then get it published so that an update gets pushed out to users? Depending on the degree

Re: [josm-dev] has the WMS-behaviour changed? (resolution)

2010-09-01 Thread Iván Sánchez Ortega
El día Wednesday 01 September 2010 13:21:26, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dijo: PS: See attached screenshot: I didn't change the resolution manually. That tells us little. What's the console output? -- Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es Un ordenador no es una televisión ni un microondas: es una

Re: [josm-dev] WMSPlugin Update

2010-09-01 Thread Iván Sánchez Ortega
El día Wednesday 01 September 2010 17:20:53, Ian Dees dijo: My update does check the available CRS from GetCapabilities for each layer and will flag a layer as unusable if it doesn't match the current projection set in JOSM's preferences. Wait a second there. So what if I query a epsg:4326

Re: [josm-dev] WMSPlugin Update

2010-09-01 Thread Ian Dees
2010/9/1 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es El día Wednesday 01 September 2010 17:20:53, Ian Dees dijo: My update does check the available CRS from GetCapabilities for each layer and will flag a layer as unusable if it doesn't match the current projection set in JOSM's preferences.

Re: [josm-dev] WMSPlugin Update

2010-09-01 Thread Dirk Stöcker
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Ian Dees wrote: Unless the plugin is stretching or reprojecting the image locally somehow, the WMS plugin will have to send the GetMap WMS request with an SRS set to whatever the projection is in JOSM (which causes the server to send back an image in the right projection).

Re: [josm-dev] WMSPlugin Update

2010-09-01 Thread Iván Sánchez Ortega
El día Wednesday 01 September 2010 18:25:51, Dirk Stöcker dijo: No it uses EPSG:4326 when Mercator is selected. The distortion resulting from that is very low due to the tile mechanism and working at high zoom levels. This silently assume Mercator is EPSG:4326 should also exist in the future

Re: [josm-dev] WMSPlugin Update

2010-09-01 Thread Ian Dees
2010/9/1 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es El día Wednesday 01 September 2010 18:25:51, Dirk Stöcker dijo: No it uses EPSG:4326 when Mercator is selected. The distortion resulting from that is very low due to the tile mechanism and working at high zoom levels. This silently

[josm-dev] GPX upload?

2010-09-01 Thread Morten Kjeldgaard
Hi, GPX upload from within JOSM stopped working for me a good time ago. SInce then, I have not uploaded any tracks, which is a shame, since I normally think of tracks as documentation for new map features (in case someone postulates that features have been copied from somewhere else.)

Re: [josm-dev] GPX upload?

2010-09-01 Thread Sebastian Klein
Morten Kjeldgaard wrote: Hi, GPX upload from within JOSM stopped working for me a good time ago. SInce then, I have not uploaded any tracks, which is a shame, since I normally think of tracks as documentation for new map features (in case someone postulates that features have been copied

Re: [josm-dev] has the WMS-behaviour changed? (resolution)

2010-09-01 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/9/1 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es: El día Wednesday 01 September 2010 13:21:26, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dijo: PS: See attached screenshot: I didn't change the resolution manually. That tells us little. What's the console output? pasted it here:

Re: [josm-dev] WMSPlugin Update

2010-09-01 Thread Ian Dees
I checked in the changes a few minutes ago and released the plugin to dist. Let me know if anyone has any problems. On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote: Hi list, I've made some changes to the wmsplugin so that discovering available layers at a particular WMS