That's a much better result, and more what I might expect. jQuery came in
3rd (1175) after Ext (585) and dojo (736).
_
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Benjamin Sterling
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 11:43 AM
To: jquery-en
Subject: [jQuery] follow
For me it was 2nd to last-only behind cssQuery.
-Dan
_
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andy Matthews
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 1:19 PM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: follow up on real world speed test
That's
:
For me it was 2nd to last—only behind cssQuery.
-Dan
--
*From:* jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
Behalf Of *Andy Matthews
*Sent:* Wednesday, June 13, 2007 1:19 PM
*To:* jquery-en@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* [jQuery] Re: follow up on real
Dan G. Switzer, II wrote on 6/13/2007 10:45 AM:
For me it was 2nd to last-only behind cssQuery.
Same here using Win/FF2.0.0.4:
MooTools 1.2dev 226
prototype 1.5.1 251
dojo query358
ext 1.1b1 511
jQuery 1.1.2dev 1100
cssQuery 2.021965
- Bil
@googlegroups.com
mailto:jquery-en@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Andy Matthews
*Sent:* Wednesday, June 13, 2007 1:19 PM
*To:* jquery-en@googlegroups.com mailto:jquery-en@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* [jQuery] Re: follow up on real world speed test
That's a much better result
Benjamin,
Which version of jQuery did you use in the tests? If its v1.1.2 that
came with the test suite, can you add v1.1.3 from SVN to see if there's
any difference? There should be since the selector speed was improved in
v1.1.3.
Thanks,
Rey...
mailto:jquery-en@googlegroups.com] *On
Rey,
Taken care of. The version that was up there was $Date: 2007-04-28 11:33:25
-0400 (Sat, 28 Apr 2007) $ $Rev: 1809 $
There is an over all upgrade in speed, but there are somethings that are
slower.
(FF2)
jQuery 1.1.3a jQuery 1.1.2dev MooTools 1.2dev ext 1.1b1cssQuery
2.02
] Re: follow up on real world speed test
Rey,
Taken care of. The version that was up there was $Date: 2007-04-28 11:33:25
-0400 (Sat, 28 Apr 2007) $ $Rev: 1809 $
There is an over all upgrade in speed, but there are somethings that are
slower.
(FF2)
jQuery 1.1.3a jQuery 1.1.2dev MooTools
I'm getting errors in FireBug since you've updated it. It won't run.
Also, could you reinclude PT and remove cssQuery? I'd like to see the
speeds of the top performers in comparison to jQuery.
I really appreciate you doing this. :)
Rey
Rey Bango wrote:
Benjamin,
Which version of jQuery
K, I took out cssQuery and put PT back in.
Rey, I had that same issue, what fixed it was clearing cache and refreshing.
On 6/13/07, Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting errors in FireBug since you've updated it. It won't run.
Also, could you reinclude PT and remove cssQuery? I'd
Give me a min, something got screwed up.
On 6/13/07, Benjamin Sterling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
K, I took out cssQuery and put PT back in.
Rey, I had that same issue, what fixed it was clearing cache and
refreshing.
On 6/13/07, Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting errors in
Still no dice, even after clearing the cache. I still get the same 2
errors at startup:
unterminated string literal
[Break on this error] window.selectors = ['*\n
speedtest (line 11)
iterable has no properties
forEach(undefined, function(), undefined)slickspeed.js (line 4)
Sorry about that, apparently the selector list needs to be only edited in
notepad. I have it up and running.
--
Benjamin Sterling
http://www.KenzoMedia.com
http://www.KenzoHosting.com
13 matches
Mail list logo
