[jvm-l] CommunityOne talk on JVM language implementers

I've been approved to do a talk at CommunityOne this year on how we all have been trying to bring JVM language implementers together. The general idea is to show that the sleeping giant of languages on the JVM is starting to wake up and will really be a force to reckon with. So now I have to

[jvm-l] Re: CommunityOne talk on JVM language implementers

Per Bothner wrote: Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: - Discussion of a few key languages that could be arguably considered popular and where they stand in their development processes - Other languages that are up and coming and their status. What about a non-popular language that have been

[jvm-l] Re: method handles and closure

On Apr 18, 2008, at 3:28 AM, Rémi Forax wrote: I tried to understand how to implement closure with method handles. So correct me if i'm wrong: - a method handle is a Java Object with a special header let say it's a 3 words header, the last word is a pointer to the signature of the

[jvm-l] Re: Fan Programing Language

Brian, Fan looks interesting, but looking at the key benefits, they look like Scala's benefits. Can you tell me the differences between Fan and Scala? Thanks, David On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Brian Frank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fan is licensed under the AFL 3.0:

[jvm-l] Re: CommunityOne talk on JVM language implementers

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Per Bothner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: - Discussion of a few key languages that could be arguably considered popular and where they stand in their development processes - Other languages that are up and coming and their status.