[Brendan J Simon]
Is there a site that documents the changes the Kai has made or is
making ?
Well, there's http://www.??.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.5/ChangLog-*,
search for kai@. He seems to have started in 2.5.7.
Off the top of my head, the main kbuild2.5 features 2.5.40 *doesn't*
have
[Brendan J Simon]
Thanks for that information. Looks like Kai's work will/may
eventually do what I want but when will it be mainstream, that is the
question.
If by mainstream you mean in 2.4, probably never. There is just no
motivation to backport it, and I doubt Marcelo would accept the
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 07:30:18PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote:
I hear ya. Remember the 2.1.1xx days? Linus looked at the relatively
mature uusb project and basically said Wow, what a load of crap, the
usb spec isn't *nearly* this complex. Then he spent a weekend hacking
up an extremely
Le jeu 03/10/2002 à 04:59, Kai Germaschewski a écrit :
Hi,
I'd appreciate to get comments on the appended patch. It's mostly cleanups
and the like, but the interesting part is the last cset, which is actually
fairly small:
14 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
The
Le jeu 03/10/2002 à 16:56, Kai Germaschewski a écrit :
This would avoid recursive make, which isn't really a good idea (even if
it's used widely). Here is a good agument about that:
http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/~soumen/teach/cs699a1999/make.html
I think I heard that before, but I would
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
-obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_INTERPRETER) := $(patsubst %.c,%.o,$(wildcard *.c))
+obj-y := dsfield.o dsmthdat.o dsopcode.o dswexec.o dswscope.o \
+dsmethod.o dsobject.o dsutils.o dswload.o dswstate.o
Should that have been:
On Thu, 3 Oct 2002, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 10:01:20PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Now it's testing time..
[...]
You must be missing some of the changes (My first push to bkbits was
incomplete, since I did inadvertently edit Makefile without checking it
out, I do that
On 3 Oct 2002, Xavier Bestel wrote:
Could you do instead:
include subdir/Makefile
?
It's not quite that easy, unfortunately ;(
This would avoid recursive make, which isn't really a good idea (even if
it's used widely). Here is a good agument about that:
