On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:19:56PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Oleg Verych wrote:
Because of that, i think, following is redundant:
- to check for binary files
find . -type f | xargs cleanfile
What about patches?
Anyway, by agreement (with myself), i've stopped on having
While i'm against whitespace damaged files or patches since my very
first patch, and don't like brain damaged programmer's tools called
text editors, i also want to encourage UNIX-way of using userspace.
Of course, i might be wrong and foolish. Anyway, what i'm trying to do
is not to become new
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 07:45:56PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
While i'm against whitespace damaged files or patches since my very
first patch, and don't like brain damaged programmer's tools called
text editors, i also want to encourage UNIX-way of using userspace.
Of course, i might be wrong
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 07:50:26PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
[]
Many things in XXI century still can be done by tools founded 20-30
years ago. Why not try to?
Because your shell script is unreadable by normal human beings[*]
while the perl script for people with a bit of perl fu can read