On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:13:26AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:16:27AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> >
> > What do you think about this one? I want to propose to remove
> > scripts/unifdef.c but to make clear policy about how to mark __KERNEL__
> > sections in header file
On 7/21/07, Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 10:39:16PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 03:21:43PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> []
> > > while you could try and make a claim against memory/cpu effeciency, i
> > > fail to see how the first or
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:16:27AM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
>
> What do you think about this one? I want to propose to remove
> scripts/unifdef.c but to make clear policy about how to mark __KERNEL__
> sections in header files. We know how obfuscated C can be, and this also
> applies to preproces
