Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] compile failure with staging tree patches

2007-05-23 Thread Jason Wessel
Jason Wessel wrote: Sergei Shtylyov wrote: Well, as it turned out, KGDB was broken WRT h/w breakpoints anyway, so nobody ever cared it seems. :-) I meant to say i386-lite.patch. :-) It does appear to be broken. I merged in the code for playing with the debug registers

Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] compile failure with staging tree patches

2007-05-22 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. Jason Wessel wrote: As it turns out, the mess is added by i386.patch and can be fixed by forcibly selecting KGDB_ARCH_HAS_HARDWARE_BREAKPOINTS for X86 case. However, neither for_akpm nor testing kgdb git trees have the functions added by i386.patch from staging tree, while master

Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] compile failure with staging tree patches

2007-05-22 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello, I wrote: While this doesn't seem to be an issue with the 2.6.21 CVS branch, i386.patch looks there starnge indeed. It doesn't look like it has the *complete* h/w breakpoint support and it doesn't enable KGDB_ARCH_HAS_HARDWARE_BREAKPOINTS option. Well, this option looks a bit strange

Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] compile failure with staging tree patches

2007-05-22 Thread Jason Wessel
Sergei Shtylyov wrote: Well, as it turned out, KGDB was broken WRT h/w breakpoints anyway, so nobody ever cared it seems. :-) I meant to say i386-lite.patch. :-) It does appear to be broken. I merged in the code for playing with the debug registers and it does not work properly at