protocols/oscar/oscarstatusmanager.cpp 9154e57
protocols/oscar/oscarversionupdater.h 2e6b9e7
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130046/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
o reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130046/#review102939
---
On March 24, 2017, 4:42 p.m., Vijay Krishnavanshi wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-
protocols/oscar/oscarprivacyengine.h 6bbacf4
protocols/oscar/oscarstatusmanager.cpp 9154e57
protocols/oscar/oscarversionupdater.h 2e6b9e7
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130046/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
> On March 24, 2017, 4:56 p.m., Pali Rohár wrote:
> > KDE3 and Qt3 support libraries are not used by oscar protocol anymore...
> > IIRC they were removed in commit 42bdc1dcfcd442e44775020d3354522e10f77c98.
> > So what is reason for this very huge patch?
>
> Vijay K
protocols/wlm/wlmlibmsn.h 6b76630
protocols/wlm/wlmlibmsn.cpp 3691ba1
protocols/wlm/wlmprotocol.cpp e559e4f
protocols/wlm/wlmsocket.h 3d50416
protocols/wlm/wlmtransfermanager.h 5a2ec61
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130041/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Vijay
the possible
changes in the timeline and approach.
Looking forward to your replies.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
mentor me.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
/wlm/wlmprotocol.cpp e559e4f
protocols/wlm/wlmsocket.h 3d50416
protocols/wlm/wlmtransfermanager.h 5a2ec61
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130041/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
6d4cdec
protocols/gadu/gaduregisteraccount.cpp 640c853
protocols/gadu/gadusession.cpp 53e4747
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130014/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
3d50416
protocols/wlm/wlmtransfermanager.h 5a2ec61
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130041/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
> On Nov. 3, 2016, 7:32 p.m., Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Can you point to documentation or description of that changed function API?
> > Or e.g. to sources?
>
> Fabian Vogt wrote:
> Unfortunately the official online source is broken (as is the online git
> browser), but I found a mirror on
Hi,
I looked around the old review requests of kopete on git reviewboard.
What needs to be done with review requests that are open.
Do I need to apply the patches according to the reviews or something else?
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
work on improving the front-end of the application also.
I think that issues will be mainly due to port of functions and of UI
changes.
I will also work try to spot bugs and fix them.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
will update the written tests after that is resolved, till
then I will write autotests that test the feature of plugins without config
file.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
to atleast complete the port of Oscar protocol and remove all
the usage of deprecated function by the end of this week.
I will get up to time line by the end of this week.
Regard,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
will look for bug fixes in the
main codebase.
Sorry, Laurent I wanted to complete 100 patches before 29 July but it looks
like I will only be able to submit 60 Patches tops by then :(
Not that I want to sound like giving an excuse but I fell sick.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
of these libkopete and plugins are done and Oscar protocol out of
protocols is complete.
Kopete mainly contains the GUI Components and needs autotests. I will start
working on kopete module after I am done with protocols.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
with these tests. I
am first porting the plugins to KF5/Qt5 and then writing tests for them to
spot regression if any.
I am also working on spotting the bugs in the main codebase.
I will complete the remaining plugin tests and will start on autotests for
protocols in the coming week.
Regards,
Vijay
://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130155/
- https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130173/
So please review them whenever you get time :) I have just mentioned them
to make them easily available.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
to the time line as I think this is part of improving protocol
support of kopete. Some of the stuff that need to be ported will need to be
reimplemented. I am trying to spec it out to work on it.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
tests/libkopete/kopetestatusgrouptest.cpp PRE-CREATION
tests/libkopete/kopetestatustest.cpp PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130155/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
commented out.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
open
another review request this week
Link: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130170/
I will post another review request with some fixes on which I also worked
last week.
I will speed up the work in coming week to make up.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
I will try to verify the same for the application.
I have linked it below to make sure if this is the same commit we are
talking about.
Link :
https://cgit.kde.org/kopete.git/commit/?h=kf5=cb97ce4e61baa44d9f401b8853982355ef6e684f
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
connections slots don't exist and signals in some. I
will try to find out what is needed for fixing them by looking at the
previous working version of Kopete.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
Hi Pali,
I am still unable to access the repo. Can you please see if the link that
you gave is correct?
I don't think syncing should take this long, I may be wrong also.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
New branch master-kf5 is in my cloned repository, available at:
> https://cgit.kde.org/clo
Jabber Protocol I am still stuck at handling the third party function
calls. I am reading about it how it can be done but as not much
documentation and example implementation is available I will need to work
more on it.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
ning in systray after closing
> last window.
>
Yes, now I see, I will make a patch undoing that particular line.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
Hi,
I am fixing the raised issues in old review requests so how do I submit the
changes for review. Should I create a new review request addressing all the
issues or create a separate review request for each old review request? or
comment on the old review request for the changes?
Regards,
Vijay
-CREATION
tests/libkopete/kopetestatusmessagetest.cpp ea25894
tests/libkopete/kopetestatustest.cpp PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130155/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
like kmail, kcontact and others also to find the issues that
can be improved. I was busy with my Visa application since last two days.
I will be able to deliver at least 70% of the project at the end of GSoC
period and will complete it before the Randa Meetings :)
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
://community.kde.org/GSoC/2017/StatusReports/vijay
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
will be able to get.
I will try my best to maximise it :) I will also make room for revisiting
it later also in my timeline.
Link to google docs (with comment rights): https://goo.gl/o1HCZq
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
On 7 May 2017 at 23:43, Paulo Lieuthier <paulolieuth...@gmail.com>
will be working on.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
tests/libkopete/kopetestatusgrouptest.cpp PRE-CREATION
tests/libkopete/kopetestatustest.cpp PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130155/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
urrent one okay?
I will create even more complex autotests.
- Vijay
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130155/#review103334
--------
/kopetestatustest.cpp PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130155/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
it out.
I was able to work out the issue of review requests. I have updated the
previous review request with new commits.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
of plugins tests or share the details of
the error to get help.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
Hi,
I have updated the status report on community.kde.org
Link : https://community.kde.org/GSoC/2017/StatusReports/vijay
I went through the report of other students and this was all they had on
theirs. Please tell if anything else should be added.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
On 22 June 2017
to timeline(if yes then for later or now)?
I am working on the test cases at present and have gotten quite a hang of
the internal connections inside kopete and how classes are handled.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
> I have few questions -
> Should I remove the section that is not being used or comment them out?
> Should I add them to timeline(if yes then for later or now)?
>
> I am working on the test cases at present and have gotten quite a hang of
> the internal connections inside kopete and how classes are handled.
>
> Regards,
> Vijay Krishnavanshi
>
that are to be discussed. Please comment where you think is ambiguous or
not possible.
Link: https://goo.gl/Fr2yNk
I am working on writing test cases for plugins. My second report of this
week is due. I will finish that up today itself.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
On 22 May 2017 at 18:18, Pali Rohár <pali
.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
-tests for latex. Few plugins are marked to be
re-written. I will try to see if it is possible to activate them if port is
the problem. I will post back the status of auto-tests in my second report
of this week.
Please let me know if reports need to be more elaborate.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
:)
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
and have autotests for their plugins that
will be best.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
for plugin once this issue gets resolved, till then I will write
tests for libkopete and other parts of the kopete application.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
in which I should
compile and link the libraries of the plugin but I guess that will be clear
in the review. I will continue working on writing test cases for libkopete
and will attempt to complete the plugin tests as well.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
planning to cover the
classes in libkopete first as its is the most important part.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
of application for testing.
I tried to post another review request on git review-board but was not able
to post its gives an error line undefined : undefined :(
I already have one open review request on the same repo. If you know where
I might be going wrong please suggest.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
---
Thanks,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
/kopetestatustest.cpp PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130155/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
/kopetestatusgrouptest.cpp PRE-CREATION
tests/libkopete/kopetestatustest.cpp PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130155/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
also or just updates on
kopete-devel are fine?
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
On 6 May 2017 at 00:11, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This year in Google Summer of Code program were selected two students
> with their projects:
>
> Vijay Krishnava
On 28-Jun-2017 03:30, "Pali Rohár" <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tuesday 27 June 2017 20:30:21 vijay krishnavanshi wrote:
> On 27 June 2017 at 23:53, Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sunday 25 June 2017 20:49:47 vijay krishnavanshi wrote:
> &g
/CMakeLists.txt e69de29
tests/plugins/autoreplace/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION
tests/plugins/autoreplace/kopeteautoreplaceplugintest.cpp PRE-CREATION
Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130183/diff/3/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
://phabricator.kde.org/source/kopete/
I will first fix the issues in git.reviewboard's review requests and will
either submit them or discard. They will be available on
git.reviewboard for reference later.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
/130195/
2- https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130225/
3- https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130183/
4- https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130173/
5- https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/130155/
I have put the links for convenience as there were only five remaining.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
On 26 August
,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
and
looking at each cases. I will update issues on phabricator.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
or a directory. I will look it up and
will submit a patch.
I have tested it by building it on my system and checking it out on my
account of Gmail. It works correctly.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
On 19 August 2017 at 21:33, vijay krishnavanshi <
vijaykrishnavan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
t because of university curriculum I get very little time :(
I will try to submit the patch by the coming week.
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
vijaykrishnavanshi updated this revision to Diff 21671.
vijaykrishnavanshi added a comment.
Restricted Application added a project: Kopete.
Restricted Application added a subscriber: Kopete.
Tweaked UI and port kDebug
REPOSITORY
R434 Kopete
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
this thread with contact info. I will put
their contacts too on the mentor list on idea page.
Any suggestions to changes or addition in the project description is also
appreciated :)
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
vijaykrishnavanshi added inline comments.
INLINE COMMENTS
> qqcrypttest.cpp:11
> +private slots:
> +void CryptTest();
> +};
Make this test data-driven.
Link: http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qttestlib-tutorial2-example.html
REVISION DETAIL
https://phabricator.kde.org/D10160
To:
achine.
Let us know if any help is required in that :)
Regards,
Vijay Krishnavanshi
70 matches
Mail list logo
