On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:48 AM, linux_...@proinbox.com wrote:
Hello list:
I'm working on a project that calls for the creation of a firewall in
KVM.
While adding a 20-interface trunk of virtio adapters to bring in a dual
10GB bond, I've discovered an 8 NIC limit in QEMU.
I found the
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:59 PM, sati...@pacific.net.hk wrote:
$ cat /etc/init.d/qemu-kvm | grep modprobe
if modprobe $module
.
if modprobe $module
then
log_end_msg 0
else
log_end_msg 1
exit 1
fi
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Bitman Zhou bitman.z...@sinobot.com.cn wrote:
I need to stop KVM starting at boot.
I added following 2 lines at the bottom of /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf
blacklist kvm
blacklist kvm-amd
Reboot PC
It doesn't work.
$ lsmod | grep kvm
kvm_amd
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/08/2010 11:48 AM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:10:29AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Are there any potential pitfalls?
It won't work well unless running on a block device (partition or LVM).
What does
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:21 AM, Chris Webb ch...@arachsys.com wrote:
I remember about a year ago, someone asserting on the list that -usbdevice
tablet was very CPU intensive even when not in use, and should be avoided if
mouse support wasn't needed, e.g. on non-graphical VMs. Was that actually
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 4:56 AM, Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu wrote:
Here's my experience with it:
- qemu-kvm starts up with a miniature resolution by default. 640x480 - on my
1680x1050 laptop screen. It's so small that initially i even overlooked
that i started it. It should multiplex
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
On 02/27/2010 04:56 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
- But i'm a more advanced user so i dont need help screens, i knew that
the
go full screen hotkey is:
LeftCtrl-LeftALT-F
... except that it is a one-way
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 15:59 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 03/01/2010 03:12 PM, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
kvm -m 512 -cdrom
/home/kirkland/.cache/testdrive/iso/lucid-desktop-amd64.iso -drive
file=/home/kirkland/.cache/testdrive/img/testdrive-disk-0086OD.img,if=virtio,index=0,boot=on
-usb
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
l...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 11:26 +, Yann Hamon wrote:
Hello list,
I am using Ubuntu 8.04 with the kvm84 and libvirt 0.6.1 backports. I am
experiencing regular crashes of my Vms - well, more like freezes than
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 22:11 +, Yann Hamon wrote:
Thanks for the pointer, Lucas.
I have worked with Yann to get a better KVM onto Ubuntu 8.04 LTS, more
or less at his request. At the time, I backported the then-current
kvm-84 from Ubuntu 9.04 (Jaunty) to Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy), as a
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
qemu-kvm-0.12.2 is now available. This release is based on the
upstream qemu 0.12.2, plus kvm-specific enhancements. Please see the
original qemu 0.12.2 release announcement for details.
Thank
)
strcpy (buf-release, qemu_uname_release);
--
1.6.5
qemu-img: improve error reporting
Use strerror to provide a better error message when qemu-img fails.
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/418112
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland kirkl...@canonical.com
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/15/2009 05:21 PM, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
- fetch the submodules and include them in the tarball
...
I think this option would help keep us all on the same page. But I
could live with pointers to the submodules
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 11:10 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Well, binaries are shipped, but I guess you'd like to build from source.
Right, sorry I was ambiguous.
We have several options:
...
- fetch the submodules and include them in the tarball
...
I think this option would help keep us all on
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
qemu-kvm-0.12.0-rc2 is now available. This release is is based on the
upstream qemu 0.12.0-rc2, plus kvm-specific enhancements. Please see the
original qemu 0.12.0-rc2 release announcement for details.
This release can be
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Daniel Bareiro daniel-lis...@gmx.net wrote:
According to I see in Launchpad, there is a fix released for Qemu and
qemu-kvm (Ubuntu).
It's fix committed in QEMU, and Fix Released in Ubuntu's qemu-kvm.
We in Ubuntu have released version of qemu-kvm-0.11.0 that
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 16:15 -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
Canonical's Ubuntu Security Team will be filing a CVE on this issue,
since there is a bit of an attack vector here, and since
qemu-kvm-0.11.0 is generally
On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 12:55 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
They can exit qemu via an ACPI shutdown. I don't see the difference.
An ACPI shutdown is triggered by an authenticated user inside of the
guest.
The present exit is triggered by any other anonymous user on the
network, with the ability
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Scott Tsai scottt...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the easiest way to see the patches to qemu that Canonical
carries for the different Ubuntu releases?
(I think http://patches.ubuntu.com/ only diffs against Debian for the
last stable Ubuntu release?)
Correct. That
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Dustin Kirkland
kirkl...@canonical.com wrote:
whitelist host virtio networking features
This patch is a followup to 8eca6b1bc770982595db2f7207c65051572436cb,
fixing crashes when guests with 2.6.25 virtio drivers have saturated
virtio network connections
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 14:25 +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 09:11 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
tap_set_offload(csum: 1, tso4: 1, tso6: 1, ecn: 1)
being called and get an mtu of 1500 on virbr0 using his birdge.sh script.
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 20:00 +0800, Scott Tsai wrote:
Excerpts from Mark McLoughlin's message of Thu Oct 29 17:16:43 +0800 2009:
Assuming this is something like the virtio-net in 2.6.26, there was no
receivable buffers support so (as Scott points out) it must be that
we've read a packet from
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 09:16 +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hi Dustin,
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 14:22 -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
I believe that we have identified a regression in qemu-kvm-0.11.0.
Regression versus which previous version of qemu-kvm?
Okay, sorry for the ambiguity. I
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 09:34 -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
In the mean time, Hardy's kernel is in git here:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-hardy.git;a=summary
I'll save you a few clicks...
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-hardy.git;a=blob;f=drivers/net/virtio_net.c;h
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 14:48 +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Ah, it all makes sense now.
I was getting confused between HOST_* and GUEST_*
this should have been:
features |= (1 VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC);
features |= (1 VIRTIO_NET_F_HOST_CSUM);
features |= (1
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 15:01 +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Sorry, should be VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM ... the rest is correct
Brilliant!
Works like a champ. I'll send a patch in a subsequent email. Would you
add a signed-off-by (or whatever), Mark?
:-Dustin
signature.asc
Description: This is a
minutes. Previously, this crashed immediately. Now,
the guest does not crash and maintains network connectivity throughout
the test.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland kirkl...@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com
Tested-by: Dustin Kirkland kirkl...@canonical.com
diff --git
I believe that we have identified a regression in qemu-kvm-0.11.0.
The kvm process crashes for older guests with virtio networking, when
the guest's incoming network connection is saturated. The subject
guest is Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy, 2.6.24 kernel with virtio backports.
For your convenience, I
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Dustin Kirkland kirkl...@canonical.com wrote:
I have not reproduced the problem:
a) by saturating the guest's outgoing network
b) with newer guests ( = 2.6.27 )
c) on kvm-84 on the host
d) or by using e1000, or rtl8139 NIC models.
:-Dustin
disappears.
Also note that I did not replace the bios.bin, as it appears to me
that the qemu-kvm-0.11 bios.bin is working properly.
Tested-by: Dustin Kirkland kirkl...@canonical.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe kvm in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Matthew Tippett tippe...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe that I have removed the benchmark from discussion, we are now
looking at semantics of small writes followed by
...
And quoting from Dustin
===
I have tried this, exactly as you have described. The tests
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Daniel Bareiro daniel-lis...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi, all!
On Saturday, 22 August 2009 10:59:47 -0300,
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
According to I see in this document [1], is necessary that is loaded
two modules in the guest: acpiphp and pci_hotplug.
The pci_hotplug
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Matthew Tippett tippe...@gmail.com wrote:
The benchmark used was the sqlite subtest in the phoronix test suite.
My awareness and involvement is beyond reading a magazine article, I can
elaborate if needed, but I don't believe it is necessary.
Process for
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Matthew Tippett tippe...@gmail.com wrote:
Can I ask you to do the following...
1) Re-affirm that Ubuntu does not carry any non-stream patches and
the build command and possibly any other unusual patches or
commandline options. This should push it back onto
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
I would like some advice on how to proceed with this bug, and where
the solution lies...in qemu or in libvirt. Ultimately, I would like
the behavior we had in our previous release with kvm-84 and
libvirt-0.6.1, where
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 10:57:55PM -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
Now, all of that said, it is actually possible to hot-add a second
scsi device. However, as far as I can tell, this method is not yet
supported
We're experiencing what we believe to be a regression in qemu-kvm-0.11
and libvirt-0.7.0, from previous versions of kvm-84 and libvirt-0.6.1:
Dynamically attaching sdb (a second scsi disk) fails. (Note that I
have tested this against libvirt-0.7.1 built from source as well--same
results.)
Here
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Matthew Tippett tippe...@gmail.com wrote:
When you indicated that you had attempted to reproduce the problem, what
mechanism did you use? Was it Karmic + KVM as the host and Karmic as
the guest? What test did you use?
I ran the following in several places:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Matthew Tippett tippe...@gmail.com wrote:
I would prefer rather than riling against Phoronix or the results as
presented, ask questions to seek further information about what was tested
rather than writing off all of it as completely invalid.
Matthew-
If you
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
qemu-kvm-0.11.0 is now available. This release is is based on the upstream
qemu 0.11.0, plus kvm-specific enhancements.
Thanks, Avi.
We in Ubuntu have tracked each of the two previous RC's, and we will
have this GA version in
On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 01:48 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Dustin Kirkland wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
qemu-kvm-0.11.0 is now available. This release is is based on the upstream
qemu 0.11.0, plus kvm-specific enhancements.
Thanks, Avi
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Now that 0.11.0 is behind us, it's time to start thinking about 0.12.0.
I'd like to do a few things different this time around. I don't think the
-rc process went very well as I don't think we got more testing out of
/qemu-kvm/+bug/430652
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland kirkl...@canonical.com
---
kvm/scripts/qemu-ifup |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kvm/scripts/qemu-ifup b/kvm/scripts/qemu-ifup
index 3bf8801..284b176 100755
--- a/kvm/scripts/qemu-ifup
+++ b/kvm/scripts
at 12:31 -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
qemu-kvm: fix segfault when running kvm without /dev/kvm, falling back
to non-accelerated mode
We're seeing segfaults on systems without access to /dev/kvm. It
looks like the global kvm_allowed is being set just a little too late
in vl.c
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Marcelo Tosattimtosa...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 11:06:38AM -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 08:22 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 19:18 -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 6:48 PM
in the
vl.c main, just after options processing, and solves the segfaults.
We're carrying this patch in Ubuntu 9.10 Alpha. Please apply
upstream, or advise if and why this might not be the optimal solution.
Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland kirkl...@canonical.com
Move the kvm_init() call a bit higher
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Mark McLoughlinmar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 12:31 -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
qemu-kvm: fix segfault when running kvm without /dev/kvm, falling back
to non-accelerated mode
We're seeing segfaults on systems without access to /dev/kvm
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Alexey Eromenkoaerom...@redhat.com wrote:
- Marcelo Tosatti mtosa...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 07:37:37AM -0400, Alexey Eromenko wrote:
Hi All !
In addition to Floppy controllers KVM-88 also break VirtIO hard
disks. (Windows 2003
Howdy, developers of qemu, qemu-kvm, and libvirt. I periodically see
bug reports on these lists from users of Ubuntu packages of these
projects.
Since these users are often running some version of the project older
than the current development branch, it's more interesting to know if
the user
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Yaniv Kaulyk...@redhat.com wrote:
On 7/2/2009 6:50 PM, Jon Watte wrote:
I'm attempting to set up a Windows XP virtual machine using KVM
running on 8.04 LTS x64 or a Core 2 Duo (6550). I have updated all
installed packages to the latest available as of a week
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Michael S. Tsirkinm...@redhat.com wrote:
Kill extra \). Also escape ! for clarity and bourne shell
compatibility.
Agreed. Looks like this one was introduced during the last merge from
qemu. It bit me too.
:-Dustin
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Anthony Liguorialigu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
This introduces some #ifdefs in pcspk to fix the build when KVM isn't enabled.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com
---
hw/pcspk.c | 15 +--
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 17:40 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I don't know why this is disabled for qemu-kvm.git.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com
---
configure |5 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 18:09 -0500, Dustin Kirkland wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 17:40 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
# Make sure the target and host cpus are compatible
if test ! \( $target_cpu = $cpu -o \
\( $target_cpu = ppcemb -a $cpu = ppc \) -o \
\( $target_cpu = x86_64
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 20:02 +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
On 6/23/09, Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Dustin Kirkland was kind enough to setup a bug tracker for QEMU on
Launchpad. I would like to make this the official QEMU bug tracker unless
there is significant objection
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:15 AM, Alessio Rocchi
alessio.roc...@staff.dada.net wrote:
I'm Running Ubuntu 8.10, here is the command I use:
kvm -net none -m 192 -no-acpi -hda ./gentoo_cleanvm.img.tar.lzma
Ubuntu 8.10 uses kvm-72 by default.
You might, perhaps, try kvm-84, which is more current and
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 18:43 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
The problem here is that 2.6.24/5 vintage guests are saying they
support
something they don't. See this for further details:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2009-01/msg00574.html
Agreed, understood. And those kernels
Howdy kvm-
I'm receiving a heavy volume of Ubuntu Jaunty Beta users reporting
that Jaunty hosts running kvm-84 (userspace and kernel) are not able
to boot previously-working Hardy guests (2.6.24 kernel) if virtio
networking is enabled [1]. Users report that if e1000 is used
instead, the guest is
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Zhang, Xiantao xiantao.zh...@intel.com wrote:
I can confirm it on ia64 platform with kvm-84 and kvm-userspace upstream
source. Another issue is that the text color is not correct.
For what it's worth, I was able to fix this in kvm
(1:84+dfsg-0ubuntu5) jaunty
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Aurelien Jarno aurel...@aurel32.net wrote:
This is most probably fixed in git, commit
7def4ba752cf629043e884dac8541fa5114c4c91
Great. Which git?
I checked:
* git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/avi/kvm.git
And I noticed Debian in your sig, so I
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
kvm-userspace.git. That changeset merged against QEMU SVN which is where
the fix really happened.
Okay, hmm... I've applied this fix (plus another queued one that
Anthony sent my way).
I'm still seeing the screen
On 2/13/09, Glauber Costa glom...@redhat.com wrote:
ppc should compile with upstream qemu code, so, put these
defines in ppc specific code that references kvm functions.
We don put them in config.h in this case, since there are
files (like vl.c) that includes both kvm.h and qemu-kvm.h,
On 2/12/09, Glauber Costa glom...@redhat.com wrote:
We don't have any kind of kvm support for linux-user targets,
but conditionalizing the inclusion of kvm header make
linux-user compilation break. And we don't have a reason to
prevent that, do we?
Ack, again, same problem here. The lack
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Gioacchino Mendola
gioacchino.mend...@gmail.com wrote:
but I have some problems,
since guest freezes at boot time
(at very early stage since it does not print any message on the attached vnc)
and /var/log/messages sports the following error message:
kvm:
64 matches
Mail list logo
