On 23.10.2009, at 21:34, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi all,
as the list of yet user-unaccessible x86 states is a bit volatile
ATM,
this is an attempt to collect the precise requirements for additional
state fields. Once everyone feels the list is complete, we can decide
how to
Hello:
I am using Cacti to monitor traffic usage on my network.
According to what I am reading, snmpd can report traffic
stats to Cacti.
Running netstat -in on the host, I see this output:
Kernel Interface table
Iface MTU MetRX-OK RX-ERR RX-DRP RX-OVRTX-OK TX-ERR TX-DRP
TX-OVR
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 09:19:40AM -0700, Saksena, Abhishek wrote:
Hi Guys,
Any help will be appreciated on following issue. I have been struggling on
this for quite some time...
-Abhishek
-Original Message-
From: Saksena, Abhishek
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Hello,
As far as i know, you can fix the vm's interfaces on the host. I'm using
libvirt and you can do it there as described in here :
http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsNICSBridge ( What you're looking
for is target dev='vnet0'/ directive ).
If you don't do this, vnet interfaces
On 10/23/2009 08:21 PM, David Martin wrote:
Does KSM support HugePages? Reading the Fedora 12 feature list I notice this:
Using huge pages for guest memory does have a downside, however - you
can no longer swap nor balloon guest memory.
However it is unclear to me if that includes KSM.
ksm
As far as i know, you can fix the vm's interfaces on the
host. I'm using libvirt and you can do it there as described in here :
http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsNICSBridge (
What you're looking for is target dev='vnet0'/ directive ).
Setting the target device name is not
On 10/23/2009 05:40 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:14:29 -0500
Javier Guerrajav...@guerrag.com wrote:
I think that the major difference between sheepdog and cluster file
systems such as Google File system, pNFS, etc is the interface between
clients and a storage system.
On 10/23/2009 05:54 PM, Stefan wrote:
Hello,
I have a simple question (sorry I'm a kvm beginner):
Is it right that a 64bit guest (8 CPUs, 16GB) is
much faster than a 32bit guest (8 CPUs, 16GB PAE).
(kvm guest and kvm host are Ubuntu 9.04, 2.6.28-15-server,
kvm 1:84+dfsg-0ubuntu12.3). eg
On 10/23/2009 12:06 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Am 22.10.2009 um 18:29 schrieb Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com:
On 10/13/2009 08:35 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
It can be particularly slow if you use in-kernel irqchips and the
default NIC emulation (up to 10 times slower), some effect I always
wanted to
On 10/25/2009 02:23 AM, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
As far as i know, you can fix the vm's interfaces on the
host. I'm using libvirt and you can do it there as described in here :
http://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsNICSBridge (
What you're looking for istarget dev='vnet0'/ directive ).
Bugs item #2883570, was opened at 2009-10-22 00:16
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by avik
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=893831aid=2883570group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
11 matches
Mail list logo
