Re: [libreoffice-l10n] compound strings

2012-01-03 Thread Sérgio Marques
2011/12/31 Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com 2011/12/31 Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com: As for the Insert Rows/Columns modal dialog, it was a good catch that needs to be fixed. But if it have been good enough for the last couple of years, then I don't think we need to urgently fix it in 3.5

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] compound strings

2012-01-03 Thread Sérgio Marques
2012/1/3 Sérgio Marques smarque...@gmail.com 2011/12/31 Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com 2011/12/31 Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com: As for the Insert Rows/Columns modal dialog, it was a good catch that needs to be fixed. But if it have been good enough for the last couple of years,

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] compound strings

2012-01-02 Thread Mihkel Tõnnov
2011/12/31 Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com 2011/12/31 Martin Srebotnjak mi...@filmsi.net: So, Andras, will you take care of these two string-formations in the code for 3.5, the one reported by Milos and the one by Mihkel? Or do we have to adapt our translations according to what the

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] compound strings

2012-01-02 Thread Andras Timar
Hi Mihkel, 2012/1/2 Mihkel Tõnnov mihh...@gmail.com: We have Delete $1 and Format $1 where $1 can be Header or Footer. Those are STR_HEADER and STR_FOOTER from sw/source/ui/docvw/docvw.src and are not used anywhere else, so you can translate them as you need to fit into the Delete $1

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] compound strings

2012-01-02 Thread Milos Sramek
Dňa 31.12.2011 13:56, Andras Timar wrote / napísal(a): 2011/12/31 Martin Srebotnjak mi...@filmsi.net: I guess the conservatism of OOo team when designing UI with those UI spec documents was a good thing and this should be in a way incorporated in the LO development process, even if with a

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] compound strings

2011-12-31 Thread Martin Srebotnjak
Hi Donald et. al., 2011/12/29 Donald Rogers donr2...@clear.net.nz On the other hand, is this a mechanism for developers to save us lots of work, retranslating the same strings over and over, e.g. OK, Cancel? this is not a proper reason to compound strings this way. There are tons of Cancels

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] compound strings

2011-12-31 Thread Michael Bauer
Quite. Even the little compounding we have leads to problems in highly inflected languages. Yes/No is another of those, which is unfortunately one that the OO team forgot, because a great many languages don't have a single word for yes and no and rely on the repetition of the verb. The only

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] compound strings

2011-12-31 Thread Andras Timar
2011/12/31 Martin Srebotnjak mi...@filmsi.net: I guess the conservatism of OOo team when designing UI with those UI spec documents was a good thing and this should be in a way incorporated in the LO development process, even if with a lower administration impact on developers - but there

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] compound strings

2011-12-28 Thread Mihkel Tõnnov
Hi Milos, Martin, *, 2011/12/29 Martin Srebotnjak mi...@filmsi.net: 2011/12/28 Martin Srebotnjak mi...@filmsi.net 2011/12/28 Milos Sramek sramek.mi...@gmail.com Hi, I have in the new Header/Footer feature of 3.5 for the first time noticed compound strings consisting of two separately

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] compound strings

2011-12-28 Thread Donald Rogers
On 29/12/2011, at 2:52 PM, Mihkel Tõnnov wrote: Hi Milos, Martin, *, 2011/12/29 Martin Srebotnjak mi...@filmsi.net: 2011/12/28 Martin Srebotnjak mi...@filmsi.net 2011/12/28 Milos Sramek sramek.mi...@gmail.com Hi, I have in the new Header/Footer feature of 3.5 for the first time