Re: [lace-chat] Bastardy Order - was Sisters

2004-07-05 Thread Dmt11home
In a message dated 7/5/2004 9:37:25 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: but now having found the proof that John Bowles was not his biological father I had to chop off the longest branch of the tree, and now I'm looking for my Roots! Good one, Brenda! It is interesting to me

Re: [lace-chat] Bastardy Order - was Sisters

2004-07-05 Thread Karen
Hi Esther, one of the joys of Family history is not just tracing dates, but having information about the person. There is something rather special about visiting a place you know someone in your ancestry spent a great deal of time, or knowledge about the occupation from which they made their

Re: [lace-chat] Bastardy Order - was Sisters

2004-07-05 Thread Katrina Worley
On Jul 5, 2004, at 10:06 AM, Esther Perry wrote: I have come to the conclusion that 'genealogy' can mean anything you want it too, and I really don't use the word a whole lot any more. I prefer 'Family History'. And in the Family's History, both biological and natural parents find a place. As

Re: [lace-chat] Bastardy Order - was Sisters

2004-07-05 Thread Brenda Paternoster
On 5 Jul 2004, at 18:06, Esther Perry wrote: I have come to the conclusion that 'genealogy' can mean anything you want it too, and I really don't use the word a whole lot any more. I prefer 'Family History'. And in the Family's History, both biological and natural parents find a place. Of