fragtimeout 64
Before 172.30.230.230 was able to ping 192.168.1.99 and 192.168.1.98, after
192.168.1.99 was unreacheable.
What's wrong? Please help...
Markus
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
Markus
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
--
Markus Schulz
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Am Samstag, 7. Mai 2005 18:55 schrieb Markus Schulz:
Am Freitag, 6. Mai 2005 23:07 schrieb Jason Boxman:
On Friday 06 May 2005 05:50, Vinod Chandran wrote:
Hi,
I have implemented QOS classifiers using TC with HTB. The
classification is working.
I would like to know whether
,
Sylvain
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Markus Feilner
---
Feilner IT Linux GIS
Linux Solutions, Training, Seminare und Workshops
those things. Somebody
correct me if this is just nonsense.
Regards,
Sylvain
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Markus Feilner
, is patching the kernel necessary? (FC2, kernel version 2.6.5)
i think yes, but i didn't tried it without.
i've tried only the variant with only one multipath default route (without the
two additional tables for each device as mentioned in the nano howto) and
this don't work.
Markus Schulz
Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 12:39 schrieb Paulo Andre:
Markus Schulz wrote:
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2005 16:05 schrieb Rafael A Barrero:
Hi guys;
[...]
Here's what I want to know:
1. Does an updated guide exist for multiple providers?
Look at this howto: http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt
Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 13:04 schrieb Paulo Andre:
Markus Schulz wrote:
Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 12:39 schrieb Paulo Andre:
Markus Schulz wrote:
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2005 16:05 schrieb Rafael A Barrero:
Hi guys;
[...]
Here's what I want to know:
1. Does an updated guide exist
Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 13:11 schrieb Sylvain BERTRAND:
On Mar 10 mai 2005 13:02, Markus Feilner a écrit :
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2005 17:58 schrieb Sylvain BERTRAND:
On Lun 9 mai 2005 17:14, Rafael A Barrero a écrit :
Hey;
I guess I should have included that aspect : what I want
Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 14:56 schrieb Markus Schulz:
Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 09:33 schrieb Rafael A Barrero:
Thanks for the link!
At the beginning of the document it states that it will not work
with two modem connections. What if both my ADSL lines are pppoe?
Will this still work
with ip_conntrack_ftp module or
similar?
--
Markus Schulz
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 16:03, Andy Furniss wrote:
sophana wrote:
Hi
I'm using wondershaper like script. But noticed imperfect
scheduling.
By googling, I found some patches that takes the aal5 atm overhead
in the scheduling algorithms.
$DEV parent : protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip \
src 0.0.0.0/0 police rate ${DOWNSTREAM}kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1
This works fine, shapes all traffic down to $DOWNSTREAM limit.
--
Markus Schulz
Is that verb regular? Does ich kann den Mond sprengen
prints the overhead and mpu value
twice? And why is the first overhead value = 0?
--
Markus Schulz
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
Am Freitag, 10. Februar 2006 14:45 schrieb Markus Schulz:
tc -s -d class show dev ppp0
class htb 1:1 root rate 576000bit ceil 576000bit burst 30Kb/8 mpu 0b
overhead 0b cburst 1739b/8 mpu 0b overhead 14b level 7
Sent 1485575598 bytes 3140554 pkts (dropped 0, overlimits 0)
rate 480008bit
/2.4routing-11.html
and please, don't send html mails to mailing lists.
Markus Schulz
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
.
--
Markus Schulz
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
calculation.
--
Markus Schulz
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
to this.
As Markus mentioned in another post on this thread, Jesper Dangaard
Brouer (http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk) has already written an iproute2
and Linux kernel patch that implements the above. ATM cell alignment
is done in tc_core.c, and the per packet overhead is passed to the
relevant
Am Donnerstag, 2. März 2006 23:18 schrieb Russell Stuart:
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 14:51 +0100, Markus Schulz wrote:
Why you don't use the existing overhead parameter? It's useless
to have two parameters which do the exact same thing (existing
overhead and your atm).
Only ATM Cell
Am Freitag, 3. März 2006 02:54 schrieb Russell Stuart:
On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 02:23 +0100, Markus Schulz wrote:
The second rate table is 100% equivalent to realtime calc. But the
static version differs for some ip-length values from it. And i
don't understand why.
Perhaps someone can point
iptables -t mangle -X MYSHAPER-OUT 2 /dev/null /dev/null
iptables -t mangle -N MYSHAPER-OUT
iptables -t mangle -I OUTPUT -o eth0 -j MYSHAPER-OUT
you must mark your traffic in FORWARD or POSTROUTING chain. OUTPUT is
only for locally generated traffic.
--
Markus Schulz
One disk to rule them
... table 100
...
$IP must changed according your setup.
the $PRIO must be changed to take at the right place. If i understand
your problem correctly the prio must be below 32759 and $IP=all. But
i'm not sure if i understand it right.
--
Markus Schulz
modprobe windows
modprobe: This module will TAINT
default via $PTP1 dev device #1 src $IP1 proto static
table routing table for slow apps
ip route add default via $PTP2 dev device #2 src $IP2 proto static
table routing table for fast apps
(Proto static needs kernel patches, but you don't really need this)
--
Markus Schulz
25 matches
Mail list logo
