On 5/31/20 8:47 AM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
> On 5/30/20 6:56 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys via lazarus wrote:
>> On 30/05/2020 9:04 pm, Brian via lazarus wrote:
>>> Copyright (c) 1993-2017 by Florian Klaempfl and others
>>> (1002) Target OS: Linux for x86-64
>>> (3104) Compiling fcllaz.pas
>>>
On 5/30/20 6:56 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys via lazarus wrote:
> On 30/05/2020 9:04 pm, Brian via lazarus wrote:
>> Copyright (c) 1993-2017 by Florian Klaempfl and others
>> (1002) Target OS: Linux for x86-64
>> (3104) Compiling fcllaz.pas
>>
On 30/05/2020 9:04 pm, Brian via lazarus wrote:
> Copyright (c) 1993-2017 by Florian Klaempfl and others
> (1002) Target OS: Linux for x86-64
> (3104) Compiling fcllaz.pas
> /home/brian/subversion/lazarus/packager/registration/fcllaz.pas(11,3) Fatal:
> (10022) Can't find unit db used by fcllaz
>
On 5/30/20 4:32 PM, Don Alfredo via lazarus wrote:
> Fpcupdeluxe maintainer message:
>
> Currently, QT5 Linux Lazarus will not build due to outdated
> libQT5pas.so that fpcupdeluxe uses.
> The same is valid for macOS.
>
> This issue will be solved in next release.
>
Thanks, that solves that
Fpcupdeluxe maintainer message:
Currently, QT5 Linux Lazarus will not build due to outdated libQT5pas.so
that fpcupdeluxe uses.
The same is valid for macOS.
This issue will be solved in next release.
--
___
lazarus mailing list
On 5/30/20 3:22 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
> On 5/30/20 2:57 PM, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
>> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 4:40 PM Brian via lazarus
>> wrote:
>>> Unless you have some reason to believe that the QT5 version of
>>> fpcupdeluxe doesn't build lazarus with QT5 bindings, I have
On 5/30/20 2:57 PM, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 4:40 PM Brian via lazarus
> wrote:
>> Unless you have some reason to believe that the QT5 version of
>> fpcupdeluxe doesn't build lazarus with QT5 bindings, I have already
>> tried this idea and still seen the same
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 4:40 PM Brian via lazarus
wrote:
> Unless you have some reason to believe that the QT5 version of
> fpcupdeluxe doesn't build lazarus with QT5 bindings, I have already
> tried this idea and still seen the same problem. Yes, I deleted back
> EVERYTHING except for the
Am 30.05.20 um 15:40 schrieb Brian via lazarus:
On 5/29/20 3:32 PM, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 5:40 PM Bart via lazarus
wrote:
It is a Lazarus/LCL/WS issue though, since other programs don't have that issue.
Yes, let's hope GTK3 bindings will be better. Now it
On 5/29/20 3:32 PM, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 5:40 PM Bart via lazarus
> wrote:
>> It is a Lazarus/LCL/WS issue though, since other programs don't have that
>> issue.
>
> Yes, let's hope GTK3 bindings will be better. Now it is alpha but
> already usable for many
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 5:40 PM Bart via lazarus
wrote:
> It is a Lazarus/LCL/WS issue though, since other programs don't have that
> issue.
Yes, let's hope GTK3 bindings will be better. Now it is alpha but
already usable for many applications.
For Brian I recommend using QT5 bindings. It has
On 5/29/20 10:40 AM, Bart via lazarus wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:54 AM Brian via lazarus
> wrote:
>
>> The only difference in the compilation (that I know of) with
>> fpcupdeluxe is that it's using the trunk version of fpc as well as of
>> lazarus.
> Using fpc trunk i.c.m. lazarus trunk
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:54 AM Brian via lazarus
wrote:
> The only difference in the compilation (that I know of) with
> fpcupdeluxe is that it's using the trunk version of fpc as well as of
> lazarus.
Using fpc trunk i.c.m. lazarus trunk is a recipe for problems.
Most of them will be fixed on
On 5/28/20 6:44 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
> On 5/28/20 6:17 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
>> On 5/28/20 3:50 PM, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 7:38 PM Brian via lazarus
>>> wrote:
Omission from last post corrected below...
Thanks, but I have also tried
On 5/28/20 6:17 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
> On 5/28/20 3:50 PM, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
>> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 7:38 PM Brian via lazarus
>> wrote:
>>> Thanks, but I have also tried various .DEBs from Sourceforge (I think
>>> I stated that in an earlier message, but not 100%
On 5/28/20 3:50 PM, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 7:38 PM Brian via lazarus
> wrote:
>> Thanks, but I have also tried various .DEBs from Sourceforge (I think
>> I stated that in an earlier message, but not 100% certain) with no
>> change in the problem.
>
> The .deb
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 7:38 PM Brian via lazarus
wrote:
> Thanks, but I have also tried various .DEBs from Sourceforge (I think
> I stated that in an earlier message, but not 100% certain) with no
> change in the problem.
The .deb packages provide a released version.
If something is fixed in
On 5/28/20 5:57 AM, John Landmesser via lazarus wrote:
>>
>
> You allways used fpcupdeluxe??
>
> Perhaps these originals are better?
>
> https://www.lazarus-ide.org/index.php?page=downloads
>
Thanks, but I have also tried various .DEBs from Sourceforge (I think
I stated that in an earlier
Am 28.05.20 um 00:53 schrieb Brian via lazarus:
On 5/20/20 8:37 AM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
On 5/20/20 5:50 AM, John Landmesser via lazarus wrote:
Am 20.05.20 um 01:12 schrieb Brian via lazarus:
Regrettably, it appears I spoke too soon. I fired up Lazarus again and
the problem is back. I'm
On 5/20/20 8:37 AM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
> On 5/20/20 5:50 AM, John Landmesser via lazarus wrote:
>> Am 20.05.20 um 01:12 schrieb Brian via lazarus:
>>>
>>> Regrettably, it appears I spoke too soon. I fired up Lazarus again and
>>> the problem is back. I'm compiling trunk for both fpc and
On 5/20/20 5:50 AM, John Landmesser via lazarus wrote:
> Am 20.05.20 um 01:12 schrieb Brian via lazarus:
>>
>> Regrettably, it appears I spoke too soon. I fired up Lazarus again and
>> the problem is back. I'm compiling trunk for both fpc and lazarus
>> using fpcupdeluxe. To recap, this is under
Am 20.05.20 um 01:12 schrieb Brian via lazarus:
Regrettably, it appears I spoke too soon. I fired up Lazarus again and
the problem is back. I'm compiling trunk for both fpc and lazarus
using fpcupdeluxe. To recap, this is under Linux Mint 19.3 64-bit
(Ubuntu base). I have absolutely *NOT* done
On 5/17/20 10:00 AM, I wrote:
> On 5/16/20 3:03 PM, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 2:49 PM Brian via lazarus
>> wrote:
>>> I tried that. Now *every* keypress is duplicated.
>>
>> It was allegedly fixed in trunk r63089 less than 3 weeks ago.
>> See:
>>
On 5/17/20 11:44 AM, wkitty42--- via lazarus wrote:
> On 5/17/20 10:00 AM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
>> On 5/16/20 3:03 PM, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
>>> It was allegedly fixed in trunk r63089 less than 3 weeks ago.
>>> See:
>>> https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=30863
>>> If nobody
On 5/17/20 10:00 AM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
On 5/16/20 3:03 PM, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
It was allegedly fixed in trunk r63089 less than 3 weeks ago.
See:
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=30863
If nobody gets the duplicate key problem with trunk any more, that
issue and all
On 5/16/20 3:03 PM, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 2:49 PM Brian via lazarus
> wrote:
>> I tried that. Now *every* keypress is duplicated.
>
> It was allegedly fixed in trunk r63089 less than 3 weeks ago.
> See:
> https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=30863
> If
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 2:49 PM Brian via lazarus
wrote:
> I tried that. Now *every* keypress is duplicated.
It was allegedly fixed in trunk r63089 less than 3 weeks ago.
See:
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=30863
If nobody gets the duplicate key problem with trunk any more, that
issue
On 5/14/20 7:59 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys via lazarus wrote:
> On 06/05/2020 1:19 am, Brian via lazarus wrote:
>> I forgot to add - I totally erased fpcup's entire tree and rebuilt
>> from scratch. No change.
>
> It's not about recompiling Lazarus. Probably more related to your
> customised settings
On 06/05/2020 1:19 am, Brian via lazarus wrote:
> I forgot to add - I totally erased fpcup's entire tree and rebuilt
> from scratch. No change.
It's not about recompiling Lazarus. Probably more related to your
customised settings in your $HOME/.lazarus/ directory.
Start your lazarus from the
On 5/7/20 8:08 AM, wkitty42--- via lazarus wrote:
> On 5/6/20 6:33 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
>> What I intend to do is to run some searches of my entire tree,
>> looking for
>> anything with lazar or fp in the name. Once I've got that
>> information, I'll
>> work through the lists and delete
On 5/6/20 6:33 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
What I intend to do is to run some searches of my entire tree, looking for
anything with lazar or fp in the name. Once I've got that information, I'll
work through the lists and delete anything that looks fpc or lazarus related.
Then I'll try
On 5/6/20 5:36 PM, Bo Berglund via lazarus wrote:
> On Wed, 6 May 2020 07:48:37 -0400, Brian via lazarus
> wrote:
>
>> Just some additional information here. I have a copy of the latest
>> Debian-based version of Linux Mint running in a virtual machine (my
>> main system is the Ubuntu-based
On Wed, 6 May 2020 07:48:37 -0400, Brian via lazarus
wrote:
>Just some additional information here. I have a copy of the latest
>Debian-based version of Linux Mint running in a virtual machine (my
>main system is the Ubuntu-based Mint) so I installed Lazarus and FPC
>from the Debian
On 5/6/20 7:48 AM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
Just some additional information here. I have a copy of the latest
Debian-based version of Linux Mint running in a virtual machine (my
main system is the Ubuntu-based Mint) so I installed Lazarus and FPC
from the Debian repositories. This gave me FPC
On 5/5/20 8:19 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
> On 5/5/20 8:16 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
>> On 5/5/20 7:57 PM, wkitty42--- via lazarus wrote:
>>> On 5/5/20 6:00 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
To save some trial and error, can anybody tell me which was the last
version of Lazarus (for
On 5/5/20 8:16 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
> On 5/5/20 7:57 PM, wkitty42--- via lazarus wrote:
>> On 5/5/20 6:00 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
>>> To save some trial and error, can anybody tell me which was the last
>>> version of Lazarus (for Linux, if that makes a difference) that
>>> doesn't
On 5/5/20 7:57 PM, wkitty42--- via lazarus wrote:
> On 5/5/20 6:00 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
>> To save some trial and error, can anybody tell me which was the last
>> version of Lazarus (for Linux, if that makes a difference) that
>> doesn't exhibit the problem of an 'm' producing a line feed
On 5/5/20 6:00 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
To save some trial and error, can anybody tell me which was the last
version of Lazarus (for Linux, if that makes a difference) that
doesn't exhibit the problem of an 'm' producing a line feed and an 'i'
producing a tab then an 'i'?
check your key
To save some trial and error, can anybody tell me which was the last
version of Lazarus (for Linux, if that makes a difference) that
doesn't exhibit the problem of an 'm' producing a line feed and an 'i'
producing a tab then an 'i'?
Thanks.
--
___
39 matches
Mail list logo
