On 11/30/21 14:24, Gordon Findlay via lazarus wrote:
Your mails containing so many lies, and so dangerous to the community,
means that I will cease being a member of the mailing list.
To Gordon, if it's not already too late, and anybody else considering
leaving the list due to recent
On 5/31/20 8:47 AM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
> On 5/30/20 6:56 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys via lazarus wrote:
>> On 30/05/2020 9:04 pm, Brian via lazarus wrote:
>>> Copyright (c) 1993-2017 by Florian Klaempfl and others
>>> (1002) Target OS: Linux for x86-64
>>> (
On 5/30/20 6:56 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys via lazarus wrote:
> On 30/05/2020 9:04 pm, Brian via lazarus wrote:
>> Copyright (c) 1993-2017 by Florian Klaempfl and others
>> (1002) Target OS: Linux for x86-64
>> (3104) Compiling fcllaz.pas
>> /home/brian/subversion/la
On 5/30/20 4:32 PM, Don Alfredo via lazarus wrote:
> Fpcupdeluxe maintainer message:
>
> Currently, QT5 Linux Lazarus will not build due to outdated
> libQT5pas.so that fpcupdeluxe uses.
> The same is valid for macOS.
>
> This issue will be solved in next release.
>
Thanks, that solves that
On 5/30/20 3:22 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
> On 5/30/20 2:57 PM, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
>> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 4:40 PM Brian via lazarus
>> wrote:
>>> Unless you have some reason to believe that the QT5 version of
>>> fpcupdeluxe doesn't build
On 5/30/20 2:57 PM, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 4:40 PM Brian via lazarus
> wrote:
>> Unless you have some reason to believe that the QT5 version of
>> fpcupdeluxe doesn't build lazarus with QT5 bindings, I have already
>> tried this idea
On 5/29/20 3:32 PM, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 5:40 PM Bart via lazarus
> wrote:
>> It is a Lazarus/LCL/WS issue though, since other programs don't have that
>> issue.
>
> Yes, let's hope GTK3 bindings will be better. Now it is alpha but
> already usable for many
On 5/29/20 10:40 AM, Bart via lazarus wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:54 AM Brian via lazarus
> wrote:
>
>> The only difference in the compilation (that I know of) with
>> fpcupdeluxe is that it's using the trunk version of fpc as well as of
>> lazarus.
> Using
On 5/28/20 6:44 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
> On 5/28/20 6:17 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
>> On 5/28/20 3:50 PM, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 7:38 PM Brian via lazarus
>>> wrote:
Omission from last post corrected below...
>>
On 5/28/20 6:17 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
> On 5/28/20 3:50 PM, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
>> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 7:38 PM Brian via lazarus
>> wrote:
>>> Thanks, but I have also tried various .DEBs from Sourceforge (I think
>>> I stated that i
On 5/28/20 3:50 PM, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 7:38 PM Brian via lazarus
> wrote:
>> Thanks, but I have also tried various .DEBs from Sourceforge (I think
>> I stated that in an earlier message, but not 100% certain) with no
>> change in th
On 5/28/20 5:57 AM, John Landmesser via lazarus wrote:
>>
>
> You allways used fpcupdeluxe??
>
> Perhaps these originals are better?
>
> https://www.lazarus-ide.org/index.php?page=downloads
>
Thanks, but I have also tried various .DEBs from Sourceforge (I think
I stated that in an earlier
On 5/20/20 8:37 AM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
> On 5/20/20 5:50 AM, John Landmesser via lazarus wrote:
>> Am 20.05.20 um 01:12 schrieb Brian via lazarus:
>>>
>>> Regrettably, it appears I spoke too soon. I fired up Lazarus again and
>>> the problem is ba
On 5/20/20 5:50 AM, John Landmesser via lazarus wrote:
> Am 20.05.20 um 01:12 schrieb Brian via lazarus:
>>
>> Regrettably, it appears I spoke too soon. I fired up Lazarus again and
>> the problem is back. I'm compiling trunk for both fpc and lazarus
>> using fpcupdelu
On 5/17/20 10:00 AM, I wrote:
> On 5/16/20 3:03 PM, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
>> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 2:49 PM Brian via lazarus
>> wrote:
>>> I tried that. Now *every* keypress is duplicated.
>>
>> It was allegedly fixed in trunk r63089 less
On 5/17/20 11:44 AM, wkitty42--- via lazarus wrote:
> On 5/17/20 10:00 AM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
>> On 5/16/20 3:03 PM, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
>>> It was allegedly fixed in trunk r63089 less than 3 weeks ago.
>>> See:
>>> https://bugs.freepascal
On 5/16/20 3:03 PM, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 2:49 PM Brian via lazarus
> wrote:
>> I tried that. Now *every* keypress is duplicated.
>
> It was allegedly fixed in trunk r63089 less than 3 weeks ago.
> See:
> https://bugs.freepasc
On 5/14/20 7:59 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys via lazarus wrote:
> On 06/05/2020 1:19 am, Brian via lazarus wrote:
>> I forgot to add - I totally erased fpcup's entire tree and rebuilt
>> from scratch. No change.
>
> It's not about recompiling Lazarus. Probably more related to your
On 5/7/20 8:08 AM, wkitty42--- via lazarus wrote:
> On 5/6/20 6:33 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
>> What I intend to do is to run some searches of my entire tree,
>> looking for
>> anything with lazar or fp in the name. Once I've got that
>> information, I'll
>>
On 5/6/20 5:36 PM, Bo Berglund via lazarus wrote:
> On Wed, 6 May 2020 07:48:37 -0400, Brian via lazarus
> wrote:
>
>> Just some additional information here. I have a copy of the latest
>> Debian-based version of Linux Mint running in a virtual machine (my
>> main syst
On 5/5/20 8:19 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
> On 5/5/20 8:16 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
>> On 5/5/20 7:57 PM, wkitty42--- via lazarus wrote:
>>> On 5/5/20 6:00 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
>>>> To save some trial and error, can anybody tell me which was th
On 5/5/20 8:16 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
> On 5/5/20 7:57 PM, wkitty42--- via lazarus wrote:
>> On 5/5/20 6:00 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
>>> To save some trial and error, can anybody tell me which was the last
>>> version of Lazarus (for Linux, if that makes a d
On 5/5/20 7:57 PM, wkitty42--- via lazarus wrote:
> On 5/5/20 6:00 PM, Brian via lazarus wrote:
>> To save some trial and error, can anybody tell me which was the last
>> version of Lazarus (for Linux, if that makes a difference) that
>> doesn't exhibit the problem of an 'm'
To save some trial and error, can anybody tell me which was the last
version of Lazarus (for Linux, if that makes a difference) that
doesn't exhibit the problem of an 'm' producing a line feed and an 'i'
producing a tab then an 'i'?
Thanks.
--
___
On 4/10/20 9:28 AM, Bart via lazarus wrote:
Sorry if this eventually gets duplicated, I forgot to change my
address to the one I use for mailing lists.
> There is a bugreport about the m->newline issue somewhere.
>
Ah, thanks. I wasn't aware of that. I guess I'll continue to use JEdit
to
On 4/10/20 9:02 AM, R.Smith via lazarus wrote:
> Are you using it through a Remote desktop or VM or such?
>
No.
> Check the Ctrl key is not pressed. i is the 9th letter and TAB is the
> 9th ASCII character. Similarly m is the 13th letter and NewLine is the
> 13th ACII character - which makes
Help, please, folks!
I am just returning to using Lazarus for the first time in probably 6
months or so, certainly for the first time since I switched operating
systems. I am now using Linux Mint 19.3 64-bit with an XFCE desktop. I
used fpcupdeluxe and installed the fixes version of both fpc and
I'm still trying to pursue the printing problem I described a few days
ago. I've been asked on one of the Ubuntu support lists what format
Lazarus uses to send data to the printer. Is it plain text, or
something else? Any offers, please...
Thanks,
Brian.
--
HI all,
Lazarus 2.0.0RC3, via svn from the fixes_2_0 branch, 64-bit Ubuntu 18
LTS. I'm having a strange problem in printing from the IDE (which I
don't do very often) and would be grateful for any ideas.
I have two printers available to me, both H-P devices, a small
monochrome laserjet which is
I'm in no way competent to try to do this sort of thing myself with
the IDE, otherwise I would have a go at it. :( It also reflects the
fact that I'm an untidy coder - I just write the code flat, and then
let the formatter tidy things up for me. That way of doing things
leads me to one suggestion,
On 10/24/2018 05:42 PM, Juha Manninen via Lazarus wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:16 PM Brian via Lazarus
> wrote:
>> ... and errors from deep inside code libraries tend to throw me,
>> especially when it's object oriented code (yes, I'm that old).
&g
On 10/24/2018 11:54 AM, Juha Manninen via Lazarus wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 3:45 PM Brian via Lazarus
> wrote:
>> Well, here's an example for you of why people may refuse to use SVN.
>>
>> I downloaded the sources via svn and built Lazarus, no problem in that
>&g
On 10/24/2018 05:19 AM, Juha Manninen via Lazarus wrote:
> Building Lazarus from sources using "svn co" and "make" is so easy
> that I wonder why people refuse to do it.
> People want to try anything except for this most obvious and easiest
> way, including fpcupdeluxe which is an overkill for
On 10/24/2018 03:32 AM, Juha Manninen via Lazarus wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 8:40 AM Brian via Lazarus
> wrote:
>> Just out of curiosity, might I ask how you feel about running the
>> .DEBs downloaded from SourceForge?
>
> Apparently you have not read the forum
On 10/23/2018 07:38 PM, Juha Manninen via Lazarus wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 8:43 PM Bo Berglund via Lazarus
> wrote:
>> lazarus.pp(1,1) Fatal: Cannot find lazcontroldsgn used by Lazarus.
>
> Ubuntu's Lazarus package is faulty. Just get the sources directly from
> Subversion server and
On 05/11/2018 08:18 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus wrote:
> On 2018-05-11 01:12, brian wrote:
>> I omitted to put in my original post that I'm running 64-bit Ubuntu
>> Studio. All the Indy examples I've been able to find seem to require
>> Windows DLLs to implement SSL/TLS.
>
> It works just
On 05/10/2018 09:42 AM, Carlos E. R. via Lazarus wrote:
> On 2018-05-10 15:31, Brian via Lazarus wrote:
>> Does anybody have a working example of sending e-mail from a Lazarus
>> program through their ISP's mail server (which requires SSL/TLS) that
>> they'd be willing to
Does anybody have a working example of sending e-mail from a Lazarus
program through their ISP's mail server (which requires SSL/TLS) that
they'd be willing to share with me? I've been trying to follow
Michael's writeup for using Synapse, I'm getting a timeout error from
deep within the Synapse
On 07/04/2017 04:25 PM, Juha Manninen via Lazarus wrote:
> It surely is reported. See this and the related issues:
> https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=30863
> Nobody has found a way to fix it for good on every system. It is
> annoying, yes.
>
OK, I'll not bother testing the other two
On 07/04/2017 01:36 PM, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 12:33:29 -0400
> brian via Lazarus <lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> Well, I'm certainly not using an Asian keyboard (not unless you mean
>> manufactured in
On 07/04/2017 11:37 AM, Julius via Lazarus wrote:
>
>
> On 07/04/2017 01:50 PM, brian via Lazarus wrote:
>> I'm seeing an *extremely* strange problem with 1.8.0 RC3, AMD64
>> version as DEBs, as downloaded from SourceForge.
>>
>> I'm using the latest Ubuntu Stu
On 06/30/2017 08:15 AM, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote:
> The Lazarus team is glad to announce the third release candidate of
> Lazarus 1.8.
>
<...>
>
> == How to test ==
>
> Download and install the 1.8 RC3.
> - On Windows you can install as a 2ndary install, that will not affect your
>
On 03/14/2017 08:07 AM, Anthony Walter via Lazarus wrote:
> Graeme,
>
> By far most of the heavy stuff is images and I don't see that as a bad
> thing. If you have a subject you want people to explore, you need to
> represent it well. Of course a website could just be static text, but
> if put
On 03/06/2017 04:31 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd via Lazarus wrote:
> On 06/03/17 00:30, brian via Lazarus wrote:
>> On 03/05/2017 10:35 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd via Lazarus wrote:> On
>> 05/03/17 15:00, brian via Lazarus wrote:>> On 03/05/2017 09:15 AM,
>> brian666--- via Laz
On 03/05/2017 10:35 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd via Lazarus wrote:
> On 05/03/17 15:00, brian via Lazarus wrote:
>> On 03/05/2017 09:15 AM, brian666--- via Lazarus wrote:> Hi all,> >
>> Just upgraded to the AMD 64 versions of FPC 3.02 and Lazarus 1.6.4
>> as> downlo
On 03/05/2017 01:17 PM, Luca Olivetti via Lazarus wrote:
> El 05/03/17 a les 18:53, brian via Lazarus ha escrit:
>> On 03/05/2017 11:59 AM, Luca Olivetti via Lazarus wrote:
>>> El 05/03/17 a les 15:15, brian666--- via Lazarus ha escrit:
>>>
>>>>
>>
On 03/05/2017 11:59 AM, Luca Olivetti via Lazarus wrote:
> El 05/03/17 a les 15:15, brian666--- via Lazarus ha escrit:
>
>>
>> The error is shown as 'Generic error while linking'. I don't think the
>> source line is relevant, as it tags the 'end.' in lazarus.pp. The exit
>> code returned is 512.
On 03/05/2017 10:35 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd via Lazarus wrote:
> On 05/03/17 15:00, brian via Lazarus wrote:
>> On 03/05/2017 09:15 AM, brian666--- via Lazarus wrote:> Hi all,> >
>> Just upgraded to the AMD 64 versions of FPC 3.02 and Lazarus 1.6.4
>> as> downlo
On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:38:39 +0300, Maxim Ganetsky wrote:
>29.09.2016 22:26, Terry A. Haimann via Lazarus ?:
>> I created the form by clicking on NewForm and then I tried to rename it
>> from the Object Inspector. I am running Lazarus 1.2.4 This app has
>
>Lazarus 1.2.4? Is it a joke?
>
49 matches
Mail list logo
