RES: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-05-01 Thread Henrique de Paula Faria
] Enviada em: domingo, 30 de abril de 2006 20:34 Para: lazarus@miraclec.com Assunto: RE: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents Here on Turkey, Visual Basic and Delphi were both most used languages by relatively elder organizations. New ones now chooses between Java and .NET (yet Delphi .NET not even considered

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-05-01 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On 5/1/06, Henrique de Paula Faria [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FPC and Lazarus are not different. BTW they´re better because are plataform independent. Better then what? On their website I see they only have it available for windows x86, linux x86 and Macintosh PowerPC. Lazarus has a few more:

RES: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-05-01 Thread Henrique de Paula Faria
That´s what i meant. FPC and Lazarus are better. :) Henrique. -Mensagem original- De: Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada em: segunda-feira, 1 de maio de 2006 14:47 Para: lazarus@miraclec.com Assunto: Re: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents On 5/1/06, Henrique de

RE: RES: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-05-01 Thread Fatih Demirdag
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: lazarus@miraclec.comSubject: RES: [lazarus] Lazarus vs PatentsDate: Mon, 1 May 2006 13:44:56 -0300 Do you remember BASIC ? (GWBasic, Quick Basic), there are a lot of people out there that still works with its open project like FREEBASIC. FPC and Lazarus are not

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-04-30 Thread Micha Nelissen
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:59:50 -0400 (EDT) Michael A. Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can answer that. It isn't taught in school at all. If you go to any school and I mean any school that teaches CompSci in any way they will tell you that, Pascal is a dead and useless language. Nobody uses

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-04-30 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
So guess what. If they don't even know what Delphi is they are not going to move to use FPC/Lazarus. It is a very tough sell here in the US. You just - unwillingly, I assume - provided a good reason to relocate the new Borland 'DevCo' to a place outside the US, considering their flagship has

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-04-30 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On 4/30/06, Florian Klaempfl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think Pascal/Delphi whatever is always stronger in Europe. On Brasil Delphi is very popular. I would say it is almost as popular as Java. It could be much more popular, but Borland's bad decisions / marketing and etc is hurting it.

RE: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-04-30 Thread Fatih Demirdag
Here on Turkey, Visual Basic and Delphi were both most used languages by relatively elder organizations. New ones now chooses between Java and .NET (yet Delphi .NET not even considered, just MS Visual Studio) On the other hand in universities pascal considered as old, incapable anddead

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-04-29 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. FPC/Lazarus is a european project mostly, and software patents are not enforced in Europe. They have no clear legal status here. 2. They would be shooting in their own foot, because FPC/GPC are actually enlarging their user-base instead

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-04-29 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: On 4/28/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1. FPC/Lazarus is a european project mostly, and software patents are not enforced in Europe. They have no clear legal status here. A more clear example: I will help the One Laptop

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-04-29 Thread Marco van de Voort
No problem. Some remarks: 1. FPC/Lazarus is a european project mostly, and software patents are not enforced in Europe. They have no clear legal status here. 2. They would be shooting in their own foot, because FPC/GPC are actually enlarging their user-base instead of making it smaller.

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-04-29 Thread m2
Michael Van Canneyt a écrit : Assuming that we are actually infringing on any patents (which I don't believe): It perfectly sums up the problem : you don't believe. But you cannot know. The only way to know whether a software is infringing a patent is to publish this software and to wait for

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-04-29 Thread Michael A. Hess
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, George Lober wrote: 1. FPC/Lazarus is a european project mostly This fact baffles me. Why isn't there more participation in development from North America ? Surely the appeal of Pascal isn't limited to cultural or national borders. Is it lack of interest for Pascal ?

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-04-29 Thread L505
I can answer that. It isn't taught in school at all. If you go to any school and I mean any school that teaches CompSci in any way they will tell you that, Pascal is a dead and useless language. Nobody uses Pascal anymore. This was almost the exact quotation I heard from people on a local

[lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-04-28 Thread lazarus . mramirez
Hi, I have a question for the Lazarus/FPC community, that I got from a another thread in the mailing list (Lazarus Foundation). Does someones knows if there's a potential problem with Lazarus or FPC due to patents ? Borland, usuallys has an open mind with open source communities. But, I

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-04-28 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a question for the Lazarus/FPC community, that I got from a another thread in the mailing list (Lazarus Foundation). Does someones knows if there's a potential problem with Lazarus or FPC due to patents ? Borland, usuallys has an open

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-04-28 Thread anteusz
Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a question for the Lazarus/FPC community, that I got from a another thread in the mailing list (Lazarus Foundation). Does someones knows if there's a potential problem with Lazarus or FPC due to patents ?

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-04-28 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On 4/28/06, Michael Van Canneyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1. FPC/Lazarus is a european project mostly, and software patents are not enforced in Europe. They have no clear legal status here. A more clear example: I will help the One Laptop Per Child Foundation develop one of their softwares. I am

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-04-28 Thread George Lober
Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a question for the Lazarus/FPC community, that I got from a another thread in the mailing list (Lazarus Foundation). Does someones knows if there's a potential problem with Lazarus or FPC due to patents ?

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-04-28 Thread Mark Andrews
Michael Van Canneyt wrote: 1. FPC/Lazarus is a european project mostly, and software patents are not enforced in Europe. They have no clear legal status here. But they are enforced here when the patent holder asks the PTO to do so. 2. They would be shooting in their own foot, because

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-04-28 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On 4/28/06, L505 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While lazarus looks like plagiarism, MSEGUI looks like creativity. Almost all softwares are plagiarism. To start with all GNU projects are a plagiarism of some kind. GNU is plagiarism of UNIX. GCC from other compilers. KDE is a plagiarism from Windows

Re: [lazarus] Lazarus vs Patents

2006-04-28 Thread johnf
On Friday 28 April 2006 17:43, George Lober wrote: This fact baffles me. Why isn't there more participation in development from North America ? What a loaded question. I think I know why. It has nothing to do with Pascal. John