* Mattias Gaertner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Fri, 28 Dec 2007
17:21:54 +0100]:
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:27:02 +0300
Andrey Gusev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:29:02
+0100]:
May be it is related to the fact in Delphi empty implementation
attached
Andrey Gusev schreef:
It may be explained by a few words ?
I don't wish discuss is it useful or harmful, correctly or incorrectly,
it important for me, to undestand: for what ?
Maybe I don't understand you without an example, but if you have a declaration
without implementation, you cannot
On Dec 28, 2007, at 3:15 PM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Andrey Gusev schreef:
It may be explained by a few words ?
I don't wish discuss is it useful or harmful, correctly or
incorrectly, it important for me, to undestand: for what ?
Maybe I don't understand you without an example, but if you
Andrey Gusev schreef:
background was http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=10455, have
sample, constructed from real rpoblem.
Empty duplicate body of my own procedure was inserted.
As i undestand: for all declared unimplemented procedures will be
inserted implementations.
It right guessed
* Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:15:31
+0100]:
Andrey Gusev schreef:
It may be explained by a few words ?
I don't wish discuss is it useful or harmful, correctly or
incorrectly,
it important for me, to undestand: for what ?
Maybe I don't understand you without an
* Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:29:02
+0100]:
May be it is related to the fact in Delphi empty implementation
attached to an event are automatically removed at the compilation
How with that in Lazarus, in future ?
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:27:02 +0300
Andrey Gusev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:29:02
+0100]:
May be it is related to the fact in Delphi empty implementation
attached to an event are automatically removed at the compilation
How with
Delphi removes empty event handlers when you save, not at compile time.
It's a nice feature and it does not remove code you wrote yourself.
2007/12/28, Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Dec 28, 2007, at 3:15 PM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Andrey Gusev schreef:
It may be explained by a few
