Re: [Lcms-user] Compiling 109 using Codewarrior

2002-07-11 Thread Christian Schmitz
> >> About unlink()... is remove() available? > > > >unlink is available if the correct lib is included and the correct > >include is done. > > > >Didn't you read the #if stuff from my last message? > > Yes, and also had incorporated to my sources. > I just was trying to avoid the need of a libra

Re: [Lcms-user] Compiling 109 using Codewarrior

2002-07-11 Thread Martí Maria
-- From: "Christian Schmitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Martí Maria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Martí Maria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:07 AM Subject: Re: [Lcms-user] Compiling 109 using Codewarrior > Hi, > > Ok, I wil

Re: [Lcms-user] Compiling 109 using Codewarrior

2002-07-11 Thread Martí Maria
Hi, Ok, I will add these changes. About unlink()... is remove() available? perhaps a quick solution would be a #define unlink remove and this would obviate the need of extra libs. > > > Fixed32 FixedSquare(Fixed32 a) > > > void VEC3scaleAndCut(LPWVEC3 r, LPVEC3 v, double d) > > > void MAT3scale

Re: [Lcms-user] Compiling 109 using Codewarrior

2002-07-11 Thread Martí Maria
istian Schmitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Martí Maria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 6:19 PM Subject: [Lcms-user] Compiling 109 using Codewarrior > Hi, > > I've downloaded the 109a version as a zip file and I&#x

[Lcms-user] Compiling 109 using Codewarrior

2002-07-10 Thread Christian Schmitz
Hi, I've downloaded the 109a version as a zip file and I'm trying to compile it for Mac OS X, Mac OS Classic and Windows, but I've some things, you may change to your sources to let it better compile. (without me changing it everytime) 1. Need function prototype for: (compile error) LPSAMPLEDCU