Any thoughts or ideas? I'm thinking that trimming the fat off of this
stuff, combined with UPX, might be enough for us to go glibc 2.1.x or even
2.2.x for base router images. At least then, it would be easier to
transition from the basics to the fun stuff.
I think glibc 2.1.x or 2.2.x on a
work?
Probably not unless you set UseLogin yes in sshd_config
Updated etc.lrp and root.lrp packages can be found here:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/ewaldw/Eigerstein2BETA/20010422/
These are alpha quality. My test system boots with these with a few
complaints from mount.
I'll try
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Any thoughts or ideas? I'm thinking that trimming the fat off of this
stuff, combined with UPX, might be enough for us to go glibc 2.1.x or even
2.2.x for base router images. At least then, it would be easier to
transition from the basics to the fun stuff.
I
Mike Noyes, 2001-04-21 14:17 -0700
I created a new list that receives our CVS commit messages. I hope this
will allow everyone to keep track of release development.
Everyone,
I committed a minor change to our website tree to test syncmail. Here are
the results:
Am Sonntag, 22. April 2001 15:31 schrieb Ewald Wasscher:
21-4updated busybox to version 0.51
I'm running eigerstein with busybox 0.51 (and replaced most of the POSIXness
links and other progs with busybox and tinylogin), but as long as we see the
seg fault in 'busybox more' it's not
The LEAF home page recently announced the affiliation of rcf, a pretty
good firewall for Linux. Personally, I think it's better than 'pretty
good', but I'm kinda biased. :-)
Here's the complete description:
rcf (aka rc.firewall) is an ipchains-based firewall with support for
over 50 network
Jean-Sebastien Morisset, 2001-04-22 15:39 -0400
The LEAF home page recently announced the affiliation of rcf, a pretty
good firewall for Linux. Personally, I think it's better than 'pretty
good', but I'm kinda biased. :-)
Jean-Sebastein,
I would expect nothing less. :)
BTW, have you received any
I was trying it, but interpreting the instrucions was difficult. The
instructions say run install.sh, I was unable to find that file. So, I
finnally figured to run rcf --configure and it poped up with a error in the
'write' script?? I saved the error, but the floppy corrupted and then it
On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
So if FAT+Minix support is approximately 30K, there is no difference in
size. What potential problems are caused by using ext2 on
floppies/ramdisks? Do vfat formatted floppies have a greater amount of
writable area than ext2 formatted ones? Does Linux
