On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Jean-Sebastien Morisset wrote:
BTW, have you received any feedback on your rcf511c4.lrp package? Also,
Nope, not yet. I haven't seen that much enthousiasm for the LRP version of
rcf. It took quite a few hours to ports all the scripts, so I'm a little
disappointed. I
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 10:28:52PM -0700, Steven Peck wrote:
I was trying it, but interpreting the instrucions was difficult. The
instructions say run install.sh, I was unable to find that file. So, I
finnally figured to run rcf --configure and it poped up with a error in the
'write'
George Metz, 2001-04-23 06:35 -0400
Most everyone saw that I was able to get a 474/411K standard/UPX'd kernel
a few days back. So I went back in, and based on the fact that I'm looking
to go for two separate kernels - one straight Ethernet Router, one Tinker
setup - I pulled even MORE Useless
Mike Noyes, 2001-04-23 09:42 -0700
Our web site is down. I submitted a support request to fix the problem. It
looks like other projects are experiencing similar problems with their dbases.
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? \
func=detailaid=418283group_id=1atid=21
Everyone,
Our
Everyone,
Our web site is down. I submitted a support request to fix the problem. It
looks like other projects are experiencing similar problems with their dbases.
Site is up again, but during browsing I have a error now and then
stating that mysql has too many connections. So it could be
Mike Noyes, 2001-04-23 10:36 -0700
I believe at this time that the SF staff was trying to slipstream an
update in. More than one project was affected. I also noticed German text
on the rblock of the SF home page shortly after our site started working
again. It's gone now. Apparently, the new
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Scott C. Best wrote:
Heya. Just wanted to confirm the 2.4.3 disk images
available at your site: the disk images do *not* have the
FTP patch, but the kernel tarball *does*. To get an LRP
image with the patch, I should dig it out of the second
tarball and roll it
Mike Noyes wrote:
Mike Noyes, 2001-04-23 10:36 -0700
I believe at this time that the SF staff was trying to slipstream an
update in. More than one project was affected. I also noticed German
text on the rblock of the SF home page shortly after our site started
working again. It's gone
Ewald Wasscher, 2001-04-23 20:22 +0200
Mike Noyes wrote:
Interesting. The German text is present on the SF home page again. At
least I think it's German.
No, it's Dutch! (which is very similar to German)
Ewald,
Thank you for correcting me. I apologize to all the German and Dutch
members of
KP Kirchdörfer wrote:
Am Sonntag, 22. April 2001 15:31 schrieb Ewald Wasscher:
21-4updated busybox to version 0.51
I'm running eigerstein with busybox 0.51 (and replaced most of the POSIXness
links and other progs with busybox and tinylogin), but as long as we see the
seg fault
George:
Hey, thanks for the 411.
Based on Tom's last post, I don't think updating
echowall for dual support should be that difficult. Unlike
other config packages, the main script takes a ruleset
and munges it with a .conf file, to produce a 3rd run
file.
That sounds
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
-rw-r--r-- 1 wolfstar root 527k Apr 22 16:17 bzImage
George,
I'd be interested in the results of killing ipfwadm only, also. I know it's
more work, and I'm only curious. So, do what you feel is best. :)
Not much more work, and I'm blessed
Might I add to the TODO-list, to include Seawall?
What does Charles think about that? For most home-users the default
Eigerstein firewall rules will be sufficient I suppose.
For an updated EigerStein image, the current firewall scripts should remain,
or migrate to something like my
Mike Noyes, 2001-04-19 13:39 -0700
Scott C. Best, 2001-04-19 11:43 -0700
Mike:
I'm not so worried about how far down they certify
as much as how far up. Certainly, everything downstairs will
be LGPL (so mods cannot be taken private, but it can be combined
with closed-source apps),
Ewald wrote
KP Kirchd=F6rfer wrote:
Am Sonntag, 22. April 2001 15:31 schrieb
Ewald Wasscher:
21-4updated busybox to version 0.51
I'm running eigerstein with busybox 0.51
(and replaced most of the POS=
IXness
links and other progs with busybox and
tinylogin), but as
George:
Sorry for the late reply...
Time to do some good old-fashioned market classification here. We have
two base-level types of people using LRP:
1. People who want to have a firewall/router that will let them share IP
addresses and don't want to spend the money on a
Okay. I got the basic-level kernel compiled. Here's what we have:
-rw-r--r-- 1 wolfstar root 470k Apr 23 16:14 kernel.standard
-rw-r--r-- 1 wolfstar root 404k Apr 23 16:15 kernel.upx
Before we get too excited, I'm stating for the record that there is next
to NOTHING in this
17 matches
Mail list logo
