Lynn,
I completly agree with all of your points, no nead to be spacific. I am too new to
the group to make any major sugestions to procedure. Most all of my changtes were
just to the normal weblet as it is/was. I do believe that the modulerization and code
cleanup I did should help support
Richard Amerman wrote:
I have made some major modifications to the LEAF Weblet. These have been posted to
the Weblet Dev Demo site.
Demo Site Location:
207.202.227.167
One thing I have in my weblet, which I see is missing in the
above demo is a standard date/time at the top of each log
Hi Charles
there is a *=* case which resets the parameter list in sh-httpd, it
disables constructs like
foo=barbaz=foo
I guess parameters without a value would pass fine
cheers
Erich
THINK
Püntenstrasse 39
8143 Stallikon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024
Hi Charles
there is a *=* case which resets the parameter list in sh-httpd, it
disables constructs like
foo=barbaz=foo
I guess parameters without a value would pass fine
Thanks for the detail...I'll see if I can remember why this was
specifically added when reviewing the code (hopefully
Responses to multiple e-mails rolled into one...
First, a point of order. In my view of the world, there are two major
issues currently being discussed:
- Modifications to sh-httpd (the actual web server) to enhance it's
ability to be used as the front-end for a web based configuration tool
-
Good sugestion on the date time.
Not sure what you mean by with the hosts.allow. It is suposed to allow everyone to
the weblet for the demo.
Richard Amerman
-Original Message-
From: Eyal Lebedinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tue 7/2/2002 1:41 AM
To: Richard Amerman
Cc:
there is a *=* case which resets the parameter list in sh-httpd, it
disables constructs like
foo=barbaz=foo
I guess parameters without a value would pass fine
Thanks for the detail...I'll see if I can remember why this was
specifically added when reviewing the code (hopefully
Hi
At 15:33 02.07.2002, you wrote:
Responses to multiple e-mails rolled into one...
First, a point of order. In my view of the world, there are two major
issues currently being discussed:
- Modifications to sh-httpd (the actual web server) to enhance it's
ability to be used as the front-end
On the sh-httpd front, I don't think there will be a lot of work
required, and sh-httpd is already in the LEAF CVS tree, so probably a
few leaf-devel posts (and a lot of beta-testing) is all that's
required.
IMHO there are 2 issues
1) the POST/GET functionality must be checked and maybe
At this point, a default compile of OpenSSH will use privilege
separation
with the sshd user. For new LEAF installations/releases, do we want
to
deviate from the (new) OpenSSH standard, or accomodate it and move on?
Either answer is fine with me, as long as there is some sort of
informed
Le Lundi 1 Juillet 2002 17:24, vous avez écrit :
Hi all,
is there a Bering UML image suitable for kernel recompiling?
I'd like to customise a little a Bering installation, but the UML image
in the Bering download section has an outdated gcc version which is no
longer supported for kernel
Le Mardi 2 Juillet 2002 18:20, Nathan Angelacos a écrit :
On 1 Jul 2002 at 22:38, Greg Morgan wrote:
I believe you need to correct your web site. It says that you changed
the location of ssh_config in the packages. I believe there are two
configuration files with one character different, a
One thing I would like to see is for people to realy look at HOW
things are
being done in the current weblet code to offer better ways to
accomplish these tasks.
For instance I'm wondering if there is a better way to incert HTML
snipits than the
cat - /HTML
/HTML
Construct. (Not that I
Jacques Nilo wrote:
[ snip ]
At this point, a default compile of OpenSSH will use privilege separation
with the sshd user. For new LEAF installations/releases, do we want to
deviate from the (new) OpenSSH standard, or accomodate it and move on?
I have a clear position on this: we
Patches item #576599, was opened at 2002-07-02 14:00
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=313751aid=576599group_id=13751
Category: packages
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to:
I'm curious about /etc/group modification?
I've upgraded two (2) potato's and two (2) woody's. Yes, there is a
new user in passwd/shadow; but, I do not have any new group for
sshd.
Yes, I have seen the instructions for installing manually; but, I
cannot find a reason for the special group.
On Tuesday 02 July 2002 08:33, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
First, a point of order. In my view of the world, there are two
major issues currently being discussed:
snip
I think it would probably help prevent confusion if mods to the web
server itself refer to sh-httpd, while issues related
On Tuesday 02 July 2002 10:29, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
2) authentication may be an issue, but maybe this would bloat
weblet, especially if we still want to support floppies
I'd prefer to avoid the authentication entirely with sh-httpd, but
basic authentication may be required. Note
Nathan Angelacos wrote:
I'm curious about /etc/group modification?
I've upgraded two (2) potato's and two (2) woody's. Yes, there is a
new user in passwd/shadow; but, I do not have any new group for
sshd.
Yes, I have seen the instructions for installing manually; but, I
cannot find
Charles Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a call for those who have done mods to the sh-httpd code to
merge their changes into CVS, either directly (preferred...only possible
if you're a registered LEAF developer), or by sending me a patch so I
can do it (I'm too busy, or this
Nathan Angelacos wrote:
On 1 Jul 2002 at 22:38, Greg Morgan wrote:
snip
Long answer: According to
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix-devm=102495293705094w2
Privilege separation takes ~24500 lines of code and puts it in a chroot
jail, leaving only ~2500 lines of code
21 matches
Mail list logo
