Re: [leaf-devel] Fwd: making heyu.lrp ???

2014-03-08 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Hi, I've sent a package for review off-list. kp Am Samstag, 8. März 2014, 12:52:59 schrieb Eric Spakman: Hello list, Can someone help Jean-Roch with this package? I don't have a development environment at the moment. Thanks, Eric Begin forwarded message: *From:*

[leaf-devel] 5.1 toolchain linux headers

2014-02-25 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Hi Andrew; can you give an advice how to update linux headers for the 5.1 toolchain? I know it's not necessary, but AFAIK its an undocumented step. thx kp -- Flow-based real-time traffic analytics software. Cisco

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.1 toolchain linux headers

2014-02-25 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
. 25.02.2014 19:30, KP Kirchdörfer пишет: Hi Andrew; can you give an advice how to update linux headers for the 5.1 toolchain? I know it's not necessary, but AFAIK its an undocumented step. thx kp -- Flow

Re: [leaf-devel] Fwd: Re: [Swan] libreswan without nss

2014-02-14 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Freitag, 14. Februar 2014, 17:06:50 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks I am not sure we should follow this path Sounds like a lot of work. Would strongswan an alternative? kp original message From: p...@nohats.ca Fri Feb 14 16:49:28 2014 Return-Path: p...@nohats.ca

Re: [leaf-devel] Git workflow questions

2014-02-11 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Hi David; Am Montag, 10. Februar 2014, 20:00:16 schrieb David M Brooke: Hi kp, Thanks for the responses. On Sat, 2014-02-08 at 00:13 +0100, KP Kirchdörfer wrote: Hi David; Am Freitag, 7. Februar 2014, 21:09:32 schrieb David M Brooke: Hi leaf-devel, I've been busy

Re: [leaf-devel] atheros driver channels bering 5.01

2014-02-11 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Hi Erich; Am Dienstag, 11. Februar 2014, 14:09:34 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi I have successfully loaded the driver for my atheros card, but it appears there are a few glitches in the reulatory domain field. Some of you may remember the thread Wifi on BuC 4.3.1 [ 60.288494] WARNING: at

Re: [leaf-devel] x86_64 from branch master fails to boot

2014-01-30 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Mittwoch, 29. Januar 2014, 19:19:43 schrieb KP Kirchdörfer: Hi, Am Montag, 27. Januar 2014, 20:18:37 schrieb KP Kirchdörfer: Hi Andrew; Am Montag, 27. Januar 2014, 20:49:06 schrieb Andrew: Hi. At least, userland should works. went back to testing branch I had without latest

[leaf-devel] failing packages in 5.1-alpha1, no showstoppers

2014-01-30 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Hi; I've recompiled evreything from scratch and found the following package failing to build: all architectures: - uboot - expected, it was a proof-of-concept but unmaintained since then, once we decide to move to u-boot the sources can be valuable - openswan - seems unfixable and it was

Re: [leaf-devel] x86_64 from branch master fails to boot

2014-01-29 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Hi, Am Montag, 27. Januar 2014, 20:18:37 schrieb KP Kirchdörfer: Hi Andrew; Am Montag, 27. Januar 2014, 20:49:06 schrieb Andrew: Hi. At least, userland should works. went back to testing branch I had without latest changes for toolchain and gcc, but based on 3.10.25 kernel. Once again

Re: [leaf-devel] x86_64 from branch master fails to boot

2014-01-27 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Hi; Am Sonntag, 26. Januar 2014, 23:02:49 schrieb Andrew: 26.01.2014 16:14, KP Kirchdörfer пишет: Hi; Am Samstag, 25. Januar 2014, 23:03:28 schrieb Andrew: Hi. Try to chroot into staging dir and test if busybox works. Do you have a small how-to how to do this? kp chroot

Re: [leaf-devel] x86_64 from branch master fails to boot

2014-01-27 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Hi Andrew; Am Montag, 27. Januar 2014, 20:49:06 schrieb Andrew: Hi. At least, userland should works. Try to extract initrd into some dir and chroot into it (with symlink /bin/sh - /bin/busybox) to check (maybe some libs has different names?). And look presence of /init. I did my very best,

Re: [leaf-devel] x86_64 from branch master fails to boot

2014-01-26 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Hi; Am Samstag, 25. Januar 2014, 23:03:28 schrieb Andrew: Hi. Try to chroot into staging dir and test if busybox works. Do you have a small how-to how to do this? kp Try to enable built-in kernel command line for debugging. 25.01.2014 22:50, KP Kirchdörfer пишет: Hi

Re: [leaf-devel] toolchain armv6zk-unknown-linux-uclibcgnueabi fails

2014-01-18 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2014, 21:21:04 schrieb Andrew: 16.01.2014 19:54, KP Kirchdörfer пишет: Am Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2014, 19:37:50 schrieb Andrew: Strange, but for me there are some errors on libs linking (like libnl3) for arm, for x86 all is OK. Maybe distro-related trouble. Maybe

Re: [leaf-devel] toolchain armv6zk-unknown-linux-uclibcgnueabi fails

2014-01-18 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Samstag, 18. Januar 2014, 17:36:05 schrieb Andrew: 18.01.2014 13:03, KP Kirchdörfer пишет: Am Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2014, 21:21:04 schrieb Andrew: 16.01.2014 19:54, KP Kirchdörfer пишет: Am Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2014, 19:37:50 schrieb Andrew: Strange, but for me there are some errors

Re: [leaf-devel] toolchain armv6zk-unknown-linux-uclibcgnueabi fails

2014-01-18 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Samstag, 18. Januar 2014, 19:26:39 schrieb Andrew: 18.01.2014 17:53, KP Kirchdörfer пишет: Am Samstag, 18. Januar 2014, 17:36:05 schrieb Andrew: 18.01.2014 13:03, KP Kirchdörfer пишет: Am Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2014, 21:21:04 schrieb Andrew: 16.01.2014 19:54, KP Kirchdörfer пишет: Am

Re: [leaf-devel] toolchain armv6zk-unknown-linux-uclibcgnueabi fails

2014-01-16 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
for arm to busybox vi tomorrow. thx kp Am Mittwoch, 15. Januar 2014, 21:45:32 schrieb Andrew: Hi. No symlink for asm to platform dir was created due to missed ARCH_INC for this target. Fixed. 14.01.2014 16:45, KP Kirchdörfer пишет: Hi Andrew, building the toolchain for armv6zk

Re: [leaf-devel] toolchain armv6zk-unknown-linux-uclibcgnueabi fails

2014-01-16 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
not the one to give anyone/you any hints how to work with git :) kp 16.01.2014 19:31, KP Kirchdörfer пишет: Hi, looks good; I'm nearly done with the armv6...- toolchain and only the usual suspects failed to build (asterisk, openswan and accel-ppp). No showstoppers for an alpha version

[leaf-devel] toolchain armv6zk-unknown-linux-uclibcgnueabi fails

2014-01-14 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Hi Andrew, building the toolchain for armv6zk-unknown-linux-uclibcgnueabi fails with error: In file included from /opt/buildtool-rpi-test/toolchain/armv6zk-unknown-linux- uclibcgnueabi/usr/include/bits/errno.h:25:0, from

Re: [leaf-devel] andrew/linux-headers - mods

2014-01-14 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
big initrd which is mounted as root through unionfs, and all other stuff is unpacked to tmpfs through unionfs, to save valuable memory). ifeq/ifdef are also used into platform makefile includes. Sounds worth testing. kp 13.01.2014 21:02, KP Kirchdörfer пишет: Hi; Rebased git branch

Re: [leaf-devel] andrew/linux-headers - mods

2014-01-13 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
buildtool.mk files - which is good to know. I've also struggled with git doing a rebase with unmerged commits (hints how to deal with it in the docs are welcome, as usual), but at last I've managed it somehow. Am Dienstag, 7. Januar 2014, 21:48:35 schrieb Andrew: 07.01.2014 19:28, KP Kirchdörfer

Re: [leaf-devel] start with branch renaming/moving

2014-01-06 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
4 janv. 2014 à 20:19, KP Kirchdörfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net a écrit : Hi; I've recently updated my router to run with a kernel 3.10.25 and it works - as you when reading this mail :). I've also get a raspberry pi up and running with the same kernel and build from the rpi

Re: [leaf-devel] start with branch renaming/moving

2014-01-06 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Montag, 6. Januar 2014, 18:00:08 schrieb Yves Blusseau: Le 6 janv. 2014 à 17:31, KP Kirchdörfer kap...@users.sourceforge.net a écrit : Hi Yves; I knew I made something wrong :) Because of that I started only with the old maint branch, which I hoped wouldn’t be that harmful

[leaf-devel] start with branch renaming/moving

2014-01-04 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Hi; I've recently updated my router to run with a kernel 3.10.25 and it works - as you when reading this mail :). I've also get a raspberry pi up and running with the same kernel and build from the rpi branch. So I think it's time, as proposed a few days ago, to move master to maint, and

[leaf-devel] proposal to move Bering-uClibc 5.0(.2) to branch maint

2013-12-28 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Hi gents; I've uploaded the images and files for 5.0.2. A proposal and request for help (Yves :)): I think it's a good time to move 5.0.2, currently in branch master to branch maint. That means that 5.0 will only get maintenance, but new major features should IMHO based on the next major

[leaf-devel] 5.1.x with kernel 3.10

2013-12-03 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
HI all; the IMHO major goal for a 5.1 version is a unified kernel for current images (i486, i686, geode, x86_64) and raspberry pi (as a real device to proof cross-compiling instead of arm-versatile, which was more a proof-of-concept with no real hardware). With the latest commits to the

Re: [leaf-devel] Toolchain missing libm.so.6

2013-11-13 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Dienstag, 12. November 2013, 13:27:23 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi folks trying to get my toolchain in order :-) I am trying to compile libpcap, but already configure detects a missing library configure:8978: i486-unknown-linux-uclibc-gcc -o conftest -O2 -march=i486 -mtune=pentiumpro

Re: [leaf-devel] latest changes breaks arm toolchain

2013-10-27 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Sonntag, 27. Oktober 2013, 13:28:02 schrieb Andrew: 26.10.2013 17:23, KP Kirchdörfer пишет: Hello; Am Donnerstag, 24. Oktober 2013, 22:31:06 schrieb Andrew: Hi. Try to unexport LDFLAGS for kernel - in any case, it isn't dependent on userland libs. 24.10.2013 19:22, KP

Re: [leaf-devel] latest changes breaks arm toolchain

2013-10-26 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Hello; Am Donnerstag, 24. Oktober 2013, 22:31:06 schrieb Andrew: Hi. Try to unexport LDFLAGS for kernel - in any case, it isn't dependent on userland libs. 24.10.2013 19:22, KP Kirchdörfer пишет: Hi, the latest changes to git master branch fixed the i486 and x86 toolchain

[leaf-devel] latest changes breaks arm toolchain

2013-10-24 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Hi, the latest changes to git master branch fixed the i486 and x86 toolchain, but compilation of the kernel in the arm toolchain is broken: armv5te-unknown-linux-uclibcgnueabi-ld: unrecognized option '-Wl,- rpath,/opt/buildtool-master/staging/armv5te-unknown-linux-uclibcgnueabi/lib'

Re: [leaf-devel] Toolchain build not successful

2013-10-14 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Montag, 14. Oktober 2013, 15:06:09 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks I am still trying to build the tookchain, rebuilt tar and find :-( but now I am running into this xzcat patch-3.4.63.xz | patch -p1 -s -d /data/leaf/devel/leaf.new/bering-uclibc/source/i486-unknown-linux-uclibc/lin ux/

Re: [leaf-devel] Future packaging

2013-10-14 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Montag, 14. Oktober 2013, 00:19:52 schrieb Erich Titl: on 12.10.2013 19:43, KP Kirchdörfer wrote: Hi Erich; Am Mittwoch, 9. Oktober 2013, 10:32:02 schrieb Erich Titl: HI Folks I have fought a bit with my new 5.01 installation on a WRAP and I am still wrestling to get it up

Re: [leaf-devel] Toolchain build not successful

2013-10-14 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Montag, 14. Oktober 2013, 18:32:02 schrieb Erich Titl: on 14.10.2013 16:41, KP Kirchdörfer wrote: Am Montag, 14. Oktober 2013, 15:06:09 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks I am still trying to build the tookchain, rebuilt tar and find :-( but now I am running into this xzcat patch

Re: [leaf-devel] Future packaging

2013-10-14 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Montag, 14. Oktober 2013, 18:55:27 schrieb Erich Titl: on 14.10.2013 17:24, KP Kirchdörfer wrote: Am Montag, 14. Oktober 2013, 00:19:52 schrieb Erich Titl: on 12.10.2013 19:43, KP Kirchdörfer wrote: Hi Erich; Am Mittwoch, 9. Oktober 2013, 10:32:02 schrieb Erich Titl: HI Folks

Re: [leaf-devel] Toolchain build not successful

2013-10-14 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Montag, 14. Oktober 2013, 19:01:11 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi KP on 14.10.2013 18:51, KP Kirchdörfer wrote: Am Montag, 14. Oktober 2013, 18:32:02 schrieb Erich Titl: on 14.10.2013 16:41, KP Kirchdörfer wrote: ... ./getdirname.pl /data/leaf/devel/leaf.new/bering-uclibc/source/i486

Re: [leaf-devel] Future packaging

2013-10-12 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Hi Erich; Am Mittwoch, 9. Oktober 2013, 10:32:02 schrieb Erich Titl: HI Folks I have fought a bit with my new 5.01 installation on a WRAP and I am still wrestling to get it up and running the way I want. I have a few requests for future packaging - Could we refrain from placing the

Re: [leaf-devel] updating GIT repository

2013-10-10 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Donnerstag, 10. Oktober 2013, 11:14:40 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Andrew on 09.10.2013 20:17, Andrew wrote: Hi. Just commit changes into this branch, and do 'git checkout master'. I have gotten the impreddion that my master is not what it used to be, as development has moved to 5.x. My

Re: [leaf-devel] updating GIT repository

2013-10-09 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Mittwoch, 9. Oktober 2013, 10:42:15 schrieb Erich Titl: Hi Folks I was offline for the better part of a year and would like to get my hands on the current development repository without loosing old, possibly not committed changes. I don't have disk space to host multiple versions and was

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.0.1 x86_64

2013-09-20 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Freitag, 20. September 2013, 16:46:07 schrieb Andrew: Hi all. Anybody tested 5.0.1 on x86_64 ? I have a report on Russian forum that e3 fails under x86_64, it shows garbage... Just did, and indeed it's broken; also in rc-1, havent tested beta1. kp

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.0.1 x86_64

2013-09-20 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Freitag, 20. September 2013, 16:27:32 schrieb KP Kirchdörfer: Am Freitag, 20. September 2013, 16:46:07 schrieb Andrew: Hi all. Anybody tested 5.0.1 on x86_64 ? I have a report on Russian forum that e3 fails under x86_64, it shows garbage... Just did, and indeed it's broken; also

Re: [leaf-devel] 5.0.1 x86_64

2013-09-20 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Samstag, 21. September 2013, 00:49:38 schrieb KP Kirchdörfer: Am Freitag, 20. September 2013, 16:27:32 schrieb KP Kirchdörfer: Am Freitag, 20. September 2013, 16:46:07 schrieb Andrew: Hi all. Anybody tested 5.0.1 on x86_64 ? I have a report on Russian forum that e3 fails under

Re: [leaf-devel] What happens now?

2005-05-18 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Tom; Many thanks to you from the Bering(-uclibc) developers as well. Shorewall made iptables easy and helped a lot to build a secure box. All the best to you - we will miss you. Am Mittwoch, 18. Mai 2005 17:25 schrieb Tom Eastep: Paul Gear wrote: - We need to look at the big issues

Re: [Leaf-devel] library information

2002-04-03 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Dienstag, 2. April 2002 07:11 schrieb Greg Morgan: There is a piece of information that is missing for me. If Bering uses 2.4.x of the kernel and Dachstein uses 2.2.x, then how can all the packages be used for either release? My assumption is that there might be substantial changes

Re: [Leaf-devel] Bering v1.0-rc1 available

2002-03-20 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Montag, 18. März 2002 22:56 schrieb Jacques Nilo: Updated with a 2.4.18 linux kernel shorewall 1.2.9. Check: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/article.php?sid=31 Jacques, Eric; it's been my understanding that Bering is based on dachstein rc2. But AFAIK dachstein rc2 had the modified backup

[Leaf-devel] ANN: DachsteinCD-glibc-2.1.3 updated

2002-03-17 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
hello fellows As you might know I've worked the last four month on a Dachstein CD based on glibc 2.1.3.. While working on it I included some bugfixes, some enhancements and I tried to stay in sync with all the necessary security updates. The latest release updates e3, openssh, libz, squid,

Re: [Leaf-devel] libz security

2002-03-12 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Dienstag, 12. März 2002 15:34 schrieb Mike Noyes: At 2002-03-11 22:37 -0600, David Douthitt wrote: On 3/11/02 at 10:42 PM, Manfred Schuler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Today I received this security announcements. If you think, it is not necessary to forward this message to the

Re: [Leaf-devel] libz security

2002-03-12 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Dienstag, 12. März 2002 18:26 schrieb Mike Noyes: At 2002-03-12 17:51 +0100, KP Kirchdörfer wrote: packages - for packages usable with glibc 2.0.x and glibc 2.1.3 packages-glibc 2.1.3 for packages compiled with glibc 2.1.3 (due to various reasons). KP, Creation of a packages tree

Re: [Leaf-devel] New FAQs for CVS and Site Mirroring

2002-03-09 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Sonntag, 10. März 2002 00:41 schrieb Mike Noyes: Everyone, I just created the following FAQs. Comments and suggestions are welcome. CVS Setup https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=9960group_id= 13751 Started to work through the FAQ - apologize my dumb question - is the

Re: [Leaf-devel] POSIXness.mail question

2002-03-05 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Dienstag, 5. März 2002 15:42 schrieb Charles Steinkuehler: Problem description: I want the Dachstein router to send mails, e.g ip-address after reboot. ipmail should do it, but I get an error error parsing sender address What's ipmail? Exactly where did this error show up? It's a

[Leaf-devel] POSIXness.mail question

2002-03-04 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Hello all; this might be discussed before, but I haven't found anything useful on the list. Problem description: I want the Dachstein router to send mails, e.g ip-address after reboot. ipmail should do it, but I get an error error parsing sender address I think that $user in

Re: [Leaf-devel] Site Update (2002-02-27)

2002-02-27 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2002 17:39 schrieb Mike Noyes: Also, note files that are 10MB should not reside on the shell server. I would greatly appreciate it if everyone started moving their files into their personal tree in cvs ASAP. Thanks.

[Leaf-devel] dachstein floppy with glibc 2.1.3

2002-02-17 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Hello; after the recent discussion about the floppy format, I agreed with the arguments, that a LEAF release has to been proofed with a floppy-only release. So I invested some time to build a floppy with glibc 2.1.3 based on the latest Dachstein 1.0.2 floppy release. I changed a few

[Leaf-devel] New dachstein 1.0.2 CD with glibc 2.1.3

2002-02-10 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Today I've put up a new build of dachstein 1.0.2 CD with glibc 2.1.3 onto sourceforge: leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/kapeka/lrp-packages I fixed one or two minor bugs, repackaged ipmail.lrp, updated to latest openssh version from Jacques Nilo, updated ez-ipupdate and replaced login, adduser

[Leaf-devel] test sorry (support-request 505419) please ignore

2002-02-06 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
You didn't. Please excuse this test mail, but I had problems with mail delivery with this list and opended the mentioned support request on sourceforge. They reported it should be solved. To check and to give feedback, I'll send this mail. Might be annoying for you, but will help

[Leaf-devel] ez-ipupdate info

2002-02-01 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Who is the current maintainer of ez-ipupd.lrp? Jacques, Shane??? I just want to let you know I've compiled successfully the latest version 3.0.11b6 against glibc 2.1.3 and use it with dachstein-1.0.2-glibc 2.1.3 As this won't be of much interest for you, I've also added the patch

Re: [Leaf-devel] Announcement: LEAF 2.4.16 + Shorewall 1.2.2

2002-01-22 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Montag, 21. Januar 2002 16:54 schrieb Ewald Wasscher: Charles Steinkuehler wrote: Let's start with a wish list, then folks can start working on whatever pieces interest them. Good idea! - Boot-strap code modified to use features available in unpatched kernel (ie no more

Re: [Leaf-devel] Announcement: LEAF 2.4.16 + Shorewall 1.2.2

2002-01-22 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Hello all; due to reported mailing-list problems, please CC, as done, to me. And forgive, if I confuse private mail with list-mail... thanks. Am Dienstag, 22. Januar 2002 19:18 schrieb Charles Steinkuehler: Anyway, I could think of a core that boots without glibc and loads glibc 2.0.7 for

Re: [Leaf-devel] [dachstein] lrp.conf/multicron Spacecheck problem

2002-01-22 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Dienstag, 22. Januar 2002 19:39 schrieb Michael D. Schleif: KP Kirchdörfer wrote: Am Dienstag, 22. Januar 2002 19:21 schrieben Sie: KP Kirchdörfer wrote: Am Montag, 21. Januar 2002 15:54 schrieb Charles Steinkuehler: I will at least apply the one line fix in the next release

[Leaf-devel] dachstein 1.0.2 glibc 2.1.3 CD

2002-01-21 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Just want you inform, that I've build a new ISO-image. It is a Dachstein 1.0.2 image upgraded to glibc 2.1.3, for other changes please refer to the Readme. You'll find the image an readme on leaf.sourceforge.net:/devel/kapeka/lrp-packages.html Just wanted to keep in sync with official

Re: [Leaf-devel] [dachstein] lrp.conf/multicron Spacecheck problem

2002-01-19 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Donnerstag, 17. Januar 2002 04:15 schrieb Michael D. Schleif: Charles Steinkuehler wrote: Following problem: Using Dachstein and creating a separate ramdisk /dev/ram1 for /var/log malfunctions lrp.conf spacecheck. I think the spacecheck intention is to monitor /var/log, cause

[Leaf-devel] [dachstein] lrp.conf/multicron Spacecheck problem

2002-01-12 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Hello; Following problem: Using Dachstein and creating a separate ramdisk /dev/ram1 for /var/log malfunctions lrp.conf spacecheck. I think the spacecheck intention is to monitor /var/log, cause there are the most changes in file size during the routers lifetime and running out of space in

Re: [Leaf-devel] Oxygen Updates

2001-12-19 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Mittwoch, 19. Dezember 2001 19:36 schrieb Ewald Wasscher: Luis.F.Correia wrote: Nathan, When booting from a CD, the only floppy formats supported are 1.44 and 2.88. David, others, is there a reason for using syslinux instead of isolinux? I'd say it's easier to use isolinux and forget

[Leaf-devel] Dachstein ramdisk

2001-12-16 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Has anyone successfully tried to add additional ramdisks (/dev/ram2)? The whole ramdisk/ramlog is confusing. kp ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

[Leaf-devel] I've done it - new developer pages

2001-12-01 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Hello all; There are new pages at: http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/kapeka/ Still mostly in german and therefor not very useful - just to verify I'm able to use the sourceforge account. BUT there is a link to LRP packages http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/kapeka/lrp-packages.html which

Re: [Leaf-devel] LEAF 2.4.14 / Shorewall 1.1.18 based distro (alpha version)

2001-11-28 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Montag, 26. November 2001 16:51 schrieb David Douthitt: KP Kirchdörfer wrote: Following the changelog from Dachstein 1.0.1 to Dachstein 1.0.1 glibc 2.1.3 New essential packages: libnsl.lrp - libnsl* glibc2.1.3 (David's package archiv) libnsl should not be necessary; under Linux

Re: [Leaf-devel] xntpd vs ntpdate

2001-11-28 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Mittwoch, 28. November 2001 04:05 schrieb David Douthitt: On 11/27/01 at 12:45 PM, Matt Schalit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jeff Newmiller wrote: [snip] xntpd steps the clock on my unix box every so often, but it slews it every day. Not sure what your seeing. David is

Re: [Leaf-devel] keyboard.lrp and some more thoughts

2001-11-26 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Montag, 26. November 2001 11:28 schrieb David Douthitt: On 11/25/01 at 10:49 PM, KP Kirchdörfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A possible extension ito add, are the deeply buried timezones provided by Charles. Why not package them as an *.lrp package? Good question :) Thought kmaps

[Leaf-devel] keyboard.lrp and some more thoughts

2001-11-25 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
I've announced keyboard.lrp on the leaf-user list; I didn't announce useful extensions, I can think about. IMHO we need something for internationalization of LEAF. A possible extension ito add, are the deeply buried timezones provided by Charles. I found these one extremely useful in

Re: [Leaf-devel] LEAF 2.4.14 / Shorewall 1.1.18 based distro (alpha version)

2001-11-21 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Dienstag, 20. November 2001 23:59 schrieb Jacques Nilo: Following my previous post on how to get rid of LRP kernel patches I Am I the only one who is under the impression, that the mailinglist is very slow and some mails arriving very late? I can't find the mentioned posting about the

Re: [Leaf-devel] Re: RC5 - Issue with sed (or cut) and seawall 4.1

2001-11-15 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Mittwoch, 14. November 2001 16:37 schrieb Charles Steinkuehler: In my upgrade to Dachstein CD RC5 I encountered some issues with Seawall that may indicate an issue with sed/cut - or Seawall (I'm not sure which) when Seawall starts I get a couple of errors: sed: Unknown option

Re: [Leaf-devel] dachstein-CD rc3/4 and glibc 2.1.3

2001-11-13 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Montag, 12. November 2001 15:58 schrieb David Douthitt: KP Kirchdörfer wrote: A few ideas how to save the necessary space for a root.lrp with glibc 2.1.3 and still fitting on a 1,44MB floppy for bootdisk.bin. Replace ash with busybox ash (including command completion) (define BB_ASH

[Leaf-devel] dachstein-CD rc3/4 and glibc 2.1.3

2001-11-10 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
I've played around with dachstein rc3 and was able to replace glibc 2.0.7 with glibc 2.1.3 - finally have a running system. Initial tests with rc4 are underway. A few ideas how to save the necessary space for a root.lrp with glibc 2.1.3 and still fitting on a 1,44MB floppy for bootdisk.bin.

[Leaf-devel] dachstein -dnscache/private networks

2001-11-10 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
As I understand 192.168 is reserved for Class C private networks. Why not touch 192.168 in /etc/dnscache/root/ip instead of 192.168.1? And the same for private Class A and Class B private networks. Saves one point of failure during configuration. kp

Fwd: Re: busybox (was [Leaf-devel] dachstein rc1 cd won't boot.)

2001-10-15 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Samstag, 13. Oktober 2001 02:20 schrieben Sie: Are you planning to upgrade to a new busybox version ?? It works o.k. for me (including bb ifconfig and bb route and even ash). If you would use even init and syslogd from bb root.lrp gets quite small, and i think the functionality is o.k for

Re: [Leaf-devel] Fw: sshd.lrp size

2001-07-15 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Sonntag, 15. Juli 2001 15:44 schrieb Jacques Nilo: floppy drive environnement. I personnally switched to a dual floppy setup: the investment was worth the benefits :-) http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/openssh.html Also update to the new version 2.9p2. Also libz is now

Re: [Leaf-devel] Ewald's Updated ES2B

2001-06-04 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Sonntag, 3. Juni 2001 18:57 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, KP [iso-8859-1] Kirchdörfer wrote: Am Samstag, 2. Juni 2001 23:09 schrieb Charles Steinkuehler: - Use the ramlog package instead of the log package...this puts the logs on a seperate ramdisk, avoiding the

Re: [Leaf-devel] Eigerstein?BETA pre-release

2001-05-21 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2001 20:26 schrieben Sie: Did you compile rp-pppoe on Debian Slink? No, RedHat compatibilty stuff as you'll find on David's CD. kp ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-30 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Montag, 30. April 2001 03:08 schrieben Sie: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 23 Apr 2001, at 19:47, Ewald Wasscher wrote: KP Kirchdörfer wrote: Unfortunately I do experience segfaults now with busybox more. It seems that when it gets an input line longer than approx. 78 (don't know

Re: syslog.conf (was: Re: [Leaf-devel] Vulnerabilities dot org)

2001-04-29 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Samstag, 28. April 2001 12:16 schrieben Sie: Ray Olszewski wrote: At 10:45 PM 4/26/01 -0700, Scott C. Best wrote: wrong where each packet log gets recorded in 3 places? I forget which version of LRP you use, but probably what you're doing wrong is accepting the default settings in

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-25 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Montag, 23. April 2001 20:41 schrieben Sie: KP Kirchdörfer wrote: 22-4add e3 (the pre 1.5 from oxygen) as the default editor Is this a version of e3, which don't make a backup of the original file? This feature of e3 is just wasting space, especially within lrcfg. I just

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-24 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Dienstag, 24. April 2001 09:25 schrieb Ewald Wasscher: I use it.also without problem this is my busybox list: basename, busybox, cat, chgrp, chmod, chown, clear, cp, cut, date,dd, df, dirname, dmesg, du, dutmp, echo, egrep, expr, false,fdflush,find, free, grep, gunzip, gzip, halt,

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-24 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Montag, 23. April 2001 20:41 schrieben Sie: KP Kirchdörfer wrote: Am Sonntag, 22. April 2001 15:31 schrieb Ewald Wasscher: 21-4updated busybox to version 0.51 I'm running eigerstein with busybox 0.51 (and replaced most of the POSIXness links and other progs with busybox

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-24 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Dienstag, 24. April 2001 20:06 schrieben Sie: KP Kirchdörfer wrote: I'm running eigerstein with busybox 0.51 (and replaced most of the POSIXness links and other progs with busybox and tinylogin), but as long as we see the seg fault in 'busybox more' it's not ready for prime time

Re: [Leaf-devel] Updating Eigerstein:progress

2001-04-22 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Sonntag, 22. April 2001 15:31 schrieb Ewald Wasscher: 21-4updated busybox to version 0.51 I'm running eigerstein with busybox 0.51 (and replaced most of the POSIXness links and other progs with busybox and tinylogin), but as long as we see the seg fault in 'busybox more' it's not

Re: [Leaf-devel] Kernel 2.4.x

2001-04-08 Thread KP Kirchdörfer
Am Sonntag, 8. April 2001 16:46 schrieb Ewald Wasscher: P.S. If I'm right the lrp package of shorewall is broken as "shorewall" is 9 characters long and doesn't fit the 8.3 msdos filenames on lrp boot floppies. Just a workaround until Tom find a new name: rename shorewall.lrp to