Hi Kim
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 01:23:54AM +0200, Kim Oppalfens said:
At 03:57 15/05/2002, Simon Blake wrote:
And lo, two days became two weeks :-).
And even later somebody replies :-)
I have one comment and one question??
Comment I think the lines with
dd=if/dev/zero of=initrd-new
And lo, two days became two weeks :-).
Rudimentary docs and packages to bring Bering up to glibc 2.2.5 are on
http://www.wix.net.nz/LEAF/
All input welcome - I'd especially like a few people to take them for a
spin before they get announced on the LEAF website or on 'users. Of
interest to
Hi folks
Nothing quite like replying to yourself a month later. A few weeks ago,
I had another go at converting Bering to glibc 2.2.5, and irritatingly,
it pretty much worked first time :-). I've now got a couple of routers
out in the field running Bering RC1 and glibc 2.2.5, and it seems
to
At 13:09 26/04/2002, Simon Blake wrote:
Would indeed make it to large for a single floppy release, but not for many
of us that run dual floppy, flash, hdd or cdrom
based leaf's. So it there any chance you can post the packages somewhere?
And maybe just maybe, if you can spare the time write a
Sure - in the next couple of days I was going to do the same conversion
to Bering RC2 and document the process for my own records. Once I've
done that, I'll certainly put both changed packages and documentation up
somewhere.
Cheers
Si
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 06:39:39PM +0200, Kim Oppalfens
Si,
How big are we talking about? Could you use it in a dual floppy set up?
Eric
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Simon Blake
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 8:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Leaf-devel] Upgrading Bering to libc 2.2
Le Mercredi 20 Mars 2002 16:20, Eric B Kiser a écrit :
I've been using Dachstein with a home grown upgrade to libc v2.2.4
(simply replacing most of /lib in root.lrp with the files from my debian
unstable box) - works a charm, and since I'm working of Compact Flash
the extra bloat isn't a
On Wednesday 20 March 2002 15:40, Simon Blake wrote:
I have a vague memory of somebody explaining to me that that the
reason that 2.2.x is so much bigger is because it has a bunch of
backwards compatibility stuff in it to allow binaries linked against
2.0.x to continue to work. So if one
I investigated libc 2.2 when it first came out and all pointers to the
bloat was support for both 32-bit and 64-bit processors. If you could
drop the 64-bit support out of the source you would likely reduce a
huge amount of compiled code (this may be a config option).
I could be on crack
On Wednesday 20 March 2002 17:23, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Dang! There goes my alpha version of LEAF...I guess I'll just have
to keep my resident Alpha systems running RedHat 7.1 busy crunching
seti@home work-units (I've got 5 DEC Personal Workstation 500a's,
three actually running).
I
Hi Folks
I've been using Dachstein with a home grown upgrade to libc v2.2.4
(simply replacing most of /lib in root.lrp with the files from my debian
unstable box) - works a charm, and since I'm working of Compact Flash
the extra bloat isn't a huge issue. It makes packaging easier (no need
to
11 matches
Mail list logo
