On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 12:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I agree, the initramfs approach would make a technical cleaner
implementation. But it also means (because of redundancy and a bigger
kernel (2.6)) a bigger base image. I also don't see a lot of real
advantages for our case yet.
Eric,
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 15:01, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
I would, however, be in favor of using a very powerful, but very small
'shell-like' scripting language (ie: forth) in the initramfs, with the
'applications' being scripts rather than biaries, which is what would make
this idea attractive
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Noyes wrote:
| On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 15:01, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
| I would, however, be in favor of using a very powerful, but very small
| 'shell-like' scripting language (ie: forth) in the initramfs, with the
| 'applications' being
On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 11:39, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
| I'll look for forth gzip and tar source.
Good luck! I've looked for these before, but have never been able to put
much time into it. While you're on the prowl, it might also be good to
keep an eye out for lua or (other small script
