On Thursday 28 February 2002 21:26, David Douthitt wrote:
On 2/28/02 at 1:52 AM, guitarlynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PicoBSD might as well not even exist anymore.
I HAD to reply to this :-)
Hehe, I figured this might peek some interest ;-)
PicoBSD is now an official part of the
On 3/2/02 at 4:30 PM, guitarlynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So they are still developing PicoBSD, but simply not posting any
updates even in the way of information to the project page???
Apparently so.
I knew it had been included in FreeBSD, but I haven't loaded a
late version. I have
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of guitarlynn
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 5:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] q regarding an ftp site for leaf-project.org
On Thursday 28 February 2002 21:26, David Douthitt wrote:
On 2/28/02 at 1:52 AM
At 2002-02-28 10:51 -0600, guitarlynn wrote:
All of your concerns are well-founded and I approve of this line
of consideration. However, when considering the wide availability
of download mirrors and the format restrictions binding each of them,
a different line of consideration will likely be
At 2002-02-28 01:52 -0600, guitarlynn wrote:
No new format to this site, rather each release taking the effort to
update the proposed alternate _download_ mirrors such as Ibiblio,
tucows, freshmeat, Dave Central, etc.
Not a proposed split, but rather a defined release of the individual
On 2/28/02 at 1:52 AM, guitarlynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PicoBSD might as well not even exist anymore.
I HAD to reply to this :-)
PicoBSD is now an official part of the FreeBSD distribution, and is
included in the source tree. The web pages haven't been updated in a
LONG time. There
At 2002-02-27 10:45 -0800, Mike Sensney wrote:
At 06:41 AM 2/27/2002 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
BTW, our released files are already on Ibiblio.org as part of the SF
mirrors. A link to the SF mirror is on the ibiblio.org home page in the
first right box labeled Sourceforge ftp mirror.
At 2002-02-27 16:28 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
At 2002-02-27 10:45 -0800, Mike Sensney wrote:
Storage of large files including CD images don't seem to be an issue.
snip
I suggest that Ibiblio is a much better repository for our files than SF.
It may be, but will everyone agree to the naming
On 2/27/02 at 4:28 PM, Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The last consideration is licensing. David is using the
MIT license, and everyone else is using GPL. From what I
understand reading the iBiblio licensing page, only one
license is allowed per repository.
Sounds like I'm the odd man
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 23:07, David Douthitt wrote:
On 2/27/02 at 4:28 PM, Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The last consideration is licensing. David is using the
MIT license, and everyone else is using GPL. From what I
understand reading the iBiblio licensing page, only one
David Douthitt, 2002-02-27 23:07 -0600
On 2/27/02 at 4:28 PM, Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The last consideration is licensing. David is using the
MIT license, and everyone else is using GPL. From what I
understand reading the iBiblio licensing page, only one
license is allowed
On Thursday 28 February 2002 00:45, Mike Noyes wrote:
This is where we disagree. I believe this is a single project with
many releases/branches. ref.
This I agree with, w/o necessarily heading in the same exact direction.
D Douthitt wrote:
I'd like to see each distro get:
* Freshmeat
At 12:06 PM 2/26/2002 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no objection to this, but we would need several things to
happen. Files stored there would have to be updated through some
mechanism when there is one in place already on sourceforge.
Maybe the primary file storage site should not
13 matches
Mail list logo
