I can support that!
In fact I was rather surprised that this question took all
this time to come up.
If we did branch away from LRP, we definitely should be
named differently. In every possible way.
But that is just my humble opinion. grin
-Original Message-
From: Matt Schalit
At 2002-01-14 23:12 -0800, Matt Schalit wrote:
How about deciding to call leaf stuff leaf
and not lrp anymore?
.lrp files
lrp all over sourceforge documents.
45 hits for Linux Router Project
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Linux+Router+Project%22+site%3Aleaf.source
forge.net
523
Everyone,
Kernels shall only be provided in tarball format. This will save us
considerable space on the shell server, and kernel tarballs don't take that
long to download.
mhnoyes@usw-pr-shell2:~/leaf$ du -sh devel
772Mdevel
Developers that haven't touched there personal devel directory
Everyone,
Here is a revised version of my previous post.
We need to make some changes to our handling of individual developer
content. We are running out of space on the shell server. SF only allocates
a maximum of approximately 1G of space on the shell server. Our devel tree
is currently
Everyone,
I would like to make the following changes to our phpWebSite.
Disable user logins
* SF will no longer allow web sites to post messages outside of the SF
domain. This will become a user admin issue.
* Eliminates mirror security concerns with user email addresses,
