Re: [LEAPSECS] speeding up again?

2023-06-21 Thread Michael Deckers via LEAPSECS
    On 2023-06-20 12:21, Michael Deckers via LEAPSECS referenced: [https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/1345_2022_167]     which was already cited by Richard Langley on 2023-06-17.     Sorry for the duplication.     MD. ___ LEAPSECS

Re: [LEAPSECS] speeding up again?

2023-06-20 Thread Michael Deckers via LEAPSECS
   On 2023-06-16 01:48, Tom Van Baak wrote about the relationship of LOD with El Niño: Attached is an LOD plot I made a while ago. A random web google link says "The five strongest El Niño events since 1950 were in the winters of 1957-58, 1965-66, 1972-73, 1982-83 and 1997-98". To my

Re: [LEAPSECS] speeding up again?

2023-06-18 Thread Seaman, Robert Lewis - (rseaman)
ubject: Re: [LEAPSECS] speeding up again? ✉External message: Use caution. Steve, > We can probably put a lot of the blame onto El Niño That sounds plausible but I'm suspicious of quick and simple explanations. You work at/for a university, near the coast, yes? Can you ping some of your climatology /

Re: [LEAPSECS] speeding up again?

2023-06-18 Thread Michael Deckers via LEAPSECS
   On 2023-06-16 13:46, jimlux wrote: 10 terasquare meters    You mean 10 square megameters = 10 Mm²; SI suffixes    apply to named units, not to its powers.    Michael Deckers. ___ LEAPSECS mailing list LEAPSECS@leapsecond.com

Re: [LEAPSECS] speeding up again?

2023-06-17 Thread Richard B Langley
/       | - From: LEAPSECS on behalf of Tom Van Baak Sent: June 15, 2023 10:48 PM To: leapsecs@leapsecond.com Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] speeding up again? ✉External message: Use caution. Steve, > We can probably put a lot of the blame onto El Niño That sounds plausible but

Re: [LEAPSECS] speeding up again?

2023-06-17 Thread jimlux
On 6/15/23 10:50 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Tom Van Baak writes: Steve, > We can probably put a lot of the blame onto El Niño That sounds plausible but I'm suspicious of quick and simple explanations. I dont think the primary El Niño phenomena involves enough mass transport to

Re: [LEAPSECS] speeding up again?

2023-06-16 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Tom Van Baak writes: > Steve, > > > We can probably put a lot of the blame onto El Niño > > That sounds plausible but I'm suspicious of quick and simple explanations. I dont think the primary El Niño phenomena involves enough mass transport to measurably change the angular momentum.

Re: [LEAPSECS] speeding up again?

2023-06-15 Thread Tom Van Baak
Steve, > We can probably put a lot of the blame onto El Niño That sounds plausible but I'm suspicious of quick and simple explanations. You work at/for a university, near the coast, yes? Can you ping some of your climatology / oceanography colleagues and get data going back as far as they

Re: [LEAPSECS] speeding up again?

2023-05-28 Thread Steve Allen
On Mon 2023-05-22T16:44:30+0200 Tony Finch hath writ: > The prospect of a negative leap second is receding. The longer-term > projected length of day from Bulletin A has been increasing towards 24h > in recent months. We can probably put a lot of the blame onto El Niño -- Steve Allen

[LEAPSECS] speeding up again?

2023-05-26 Thread Tony Finch
The prospect of a negative leap second is receding. The longer-term projected length of day from Bulletin A has been increasing towards 24h in recent months. 2023-02-02 -260 µs 2023-02-09 -250 µs 2023-02-16 -250 µs 2023-02-23 -240 µs 2023-03-02 -230 µs 2023-03-09 -230 µs 2023-03-16 -220 µs