Steve Allen wrote:
The plots by Arias indicate how well UT1 could have been predicted
over two and three year intervals for the 40 year interval starting
around 1960. It is based on those plots that I have voiced no
concerns for the pointing of our telescopes if leap seconds were
published
On Thu 2007-01-18T00:40:56 -0700, M. Warner Losh hath writ:
Thus UT1 is not, strictly speaking, a form of solar time
This was the point made by Aoki et al. in 1982
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=1982A%26A...105..359A
when they replaced Newcomb's expressions (which had
Steve Allen wrote:
http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/leapsecs/torino/arias_3.pdf
This is the really interesting one. They present the accuracy of
simulated predictions of UT1, and that accuracy is much poorer than
the figures we've been discussing so far. But they make it clear that
the prediction is
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zefram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Steve Allen wrote:
: http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/leapsecs/torino/arias_3.pdf
:
: This is the really interesting one. They present the accuracy of
: simulated predictions of UT1, and that accuracy is much poorer than
:
On Wed 2007-01-17T21:47:50 -, Robert Jones hath writ:
Does anyone know where I can find what the predicted effects of global
warming on rotation due to weight redistribution are likely to be and the
potential rate of change over the next few decades or centuries, perhaps
till all the ice
