Isn’t the question whether those responsible for issuing leap seconds will
follow through and trigger a negative leap second even if Bulletin A says it’s
time? Much consternation will be feigned.
Rob Seaman
Lunar and Planetary Laboratory
University of Arizona
On 3/19/23, 5:21 PM, "LEAPSECS"
On Mon 2023-03-20T00:55:26+ Seaman, Robert Lewis - (rseaman) hath writ:
> Much consternation will be feigned.
I will be making much use of the Michael Jackson eating popcorn gif
--
Steve Allen WGS-84 (GPS)
UCO/Lick Observatory--ISB 260 Natural Sciences II,
One of the reasons the implementation of the suppression of leap seconds
was placed so far in the future is that GLONASS is said to rely on the
current implementation of UTC. I wonder, if the international authorities
decided to suppress a negative leap second but Russia decided that GLONASS
On Sun 2023-03-19T19:24:56-0400 Demetrios Matsakis via LEAPSECS hath writ:
> https://insidegnss.com/will-we-have-a-negative-leap-second/
> Will We Have a Negative Leap Second?
The USNO predictions in IERS Bulletin A have been pretty good...
https://www.ucolick.org/~sla/leapsecs/bulla52w.html
