Elizabeth, I support you completely in writing sources however you like. You
are clearly an articulate person, and I'm sure your study of the descendants
of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson is in excellent order. I would
never presume to change what you are doing.
I only reply on this topic
...@worldnet.att.net
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Access dates
Reply changed to plain text as the list rules requires it.
Of course, if it's important to you to have the date, then record it. Does
EE require
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 5:31 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Access dates
Debra,
I appreciated your succinct run-down of the very good reasons that we use
an
accessed date. Thanks for posting it for others to think about, as well.
Discussion of this nature, in the context of the usage
matter?
Elizabeth
researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
- Original Message -
From: M Couch genet...@wave.co.nz
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2009 1:05 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Re: Access dates
I've enjoyed
Elizabeth Richardson wrote:
Janis, let me be clear that I do not at all denigrate those
of you who choose to use the Mills style of sourcing. How
you choose to construct your sources is up to you. But,
please, don't impose it on me. My objection has always
been that the attitude of many
Hi:
I'm new to your list group, but I would like to respond to why access dates may
be or are important.
1. It allows the researcher to know when he/she was there last.
2. How old the location of the site that holds a book, web site, repository,
other information, etc., held by the
:33 AM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Re: Access dates
Hi:
I'm new to your list group, but I would like to respond to why access dates
may be or are important.
1. It allows the researcher to know when he/she was there last.
2. How old the location of the site that holds a book, web site,
repository
: Debra Andrew dandr...@comcast.net
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Access dates
Dear List:
I'm sorry if anyone has taken offense at my reply as it was not directed
to anyone personally. The question was raised
...@worldnet.att.net
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Access dates
Reply changed to plain text as the list rules requires it.
Of course, if it's important to you to have the date, then record it.
Does EE require
: Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Access dates
Dear List:
I'm sorry if anyone has taken offense at my reply as it was not directed to
anyone personally. The question was raised as to why would someone include
access dates and the reasoning behind it. If you look at my message
carefully, you will see
10 matches
Mail list logo
