Paula wrote Seems like someone recently posted here (I have a stickie
on this!) that they use abt 1820 when the year has been indicated by
a source; e.g., census listing. But they use est 1820 when they're
using some other algorithm to come up with the year; e.g., Robert's
calculations.
Might have been me I just reposted my system a moment ago. I use CAL
when calculated from an age at a time ABT when an aprox date was listed
somewhere else - and EST when I am figuring out an estimated year from other
people's info and cultural norms...
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 9:51 AM,
Seems like someone recently posted here (I have a stickie on this!) that they
use abt 1820 when the year has been indicated by a source; e.g., census
listing. But they use est 1820 when they're using some other algorithm to
come up with the year; e.g., Robert's calculations. Anything with abt
, September 22, 2009 7:51 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Children Sort Order (dates or no dates?)
Seems like someone recently posted here (I have a stickie on this!) that
they use abt 1820 when the year has been indicated by a source; e.g.,
census listing
4 matches
Mail list logo
