Suzanne:
I'm a huge creator of PDF files and have been for a number of years. I used
to save and scan all of my sources to PDF files because I dislike having
tons of paper files. Digital is better. However, over the years when
incorporating them into genealogy software they can become quite
@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 10:49 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] To pdf or not to pdf
...
I guess it's up to the user as to what their preference will be later on
down the road when you have thousands of images/PDFs. One big advantage of
using the PDF files is that you can add notes
...@legacyfamilytree.com]on
Behalf Of Ward Walker
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 2:35 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] To pdf or not to pdf
Bill,
Adobe Reader is able to add annotations to a PDF if the appropriate user
rights have been applied to the PDF. I suspect
: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 3:17 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] To pdf or not to pdf
I think you're speaking of the permissions for sharing with people who are
only using the Reader.
I forgot to mention that I'm using the latest Adobe Acrobat software. I
don't remember what the capabilities were
Personally, I use images for photos only and pdf's for all documents. Having
images of documented records come up in reports would only bloat reports,
whereas citing sources streamlines reports. Just my 2ยข worth
If the document is important to your report, then print it out as an
attachment.
5 matches
Mail list logo
