Hi
I would also like your thoughts, if thats ok?
Regards
Lin
please browse my family tree at
http://mytangledfamily.tribalpages.com
From: Jackie bakerj...@gmail.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Tuesday, 27 October, 2009 2:02:33
Subject:
You may want to wait a bit longer, I just discovered bad problems with printing
Source Reference numbers, the Sources are listed appropriately but not all of
the reference numbers appear in the Report when printed out.
I am afraid they may put too much emphasis on adding gee haws and not enough
Hi Jackie,
Welcome to the list. Yes, I switched from TMG 7 to Legacy 7.0 Deluxe, and I
would definitely NOT switch back to TMG for a variety of reasons. I had
been using TMG for about 15 years. Although it is a daunting task to clean
up all the records, the finished product is well worth the
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 3:10 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy vs TMG and then some
Cathy,
Thanks for the comments and I am looking forward to trying V7. For the
FTM problem, I have reinstalled it on three drives now always from
From: Cathy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Legacy 7 requires much the same although for mapping you need IE7 and I
think it would drive you mad without broadband connection. I don't
understand people not being interested in maps. :-)
I don't understand people being interested in current maps. I am,
Hi Elizabeth,
Because they're not just street maps. You can see the countryside and
in 3D the elevation. But even modern roads mostly follow old routes.
Of course old maps are invaluable but modern are not irrelevant.
Cathy
At 03:20 PM 31/05/2008, you wrote:
From: Cathy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
;
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy vs TMG and then some
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Date: Friday, May 30, 2008, 6:07 PM
Hi Jane,
Three comments.
Legacy 7 reports give the option to have sources as footnotes,
endnotes or endnotes at the end of each section/generation.
Re importing an FTM
Legacy 7 does include CHARTING - it does not use witnesses.
Keith
.. and pretty awful it is too
David - Genbox user, testing Legacy
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Ayres
Sent: 30 May 2008 03:45
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy vs TMG
Roberta, about a month ago I did the same after a number of comments on the
LUG, I didn't have any trouble importing my db into TMG but I
Then how come you are still a member of the LEGACY USERS GROUP and not the
tmg group. Oh, I know you've seen the errors of your way and want to come
back
Steve
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 15:48:05 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy vs TMG
To: LegacyUserGroup
Legacy 7 does not yet support witness, but it does have a very good CHARTING
addition.
See for an example http://rmhh.co.uk/ Descendants_of_John_HALL.pdf
--
Rodney HALL
Heywood, Lancashire
Suaviter sed fortiter
Agreeably but powerfully
~
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://rmhh.co.uk/
Broken URL in the last posting
Legacy 7 does not yet support witness, but it does have a very good CHARTING
addition.
See for an example http://rmhh.co.uk/descendants_of_john_hall.pdf
--
Rodney HALL
Heywood, Lancashire
Suaviter sed fortiter
Agreeably but powerfully
~
[EMAIL
Broken URL in the last posting
Legacy 7 does not yet support witness, but it does have a very good CHARTING
addition.
See for an example http://rmhh.co.uk/ Descendants_of_John_HALL.pdf
--
Rodney HALL
Heywood, Lancashire
Suaviter sed fortiter
Agreeably but powerfully
~
[EMAIL
Hi
I am one who has used practically every Genealogy software,all have some
features that are better than others, but overall Legacy is for me , the
best. I cannot fatom all the whingers who are not even Legacy users, yet
are members of the LUG. Strange or what ?
Bill, Plymouth, UK
Legacy
Rodney Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Legacy 7 does not yet support witness, but it does have a very good
CHARTING addition.
See for an example http://rmhh.co.uk/descendants_of_john_hall.pdf
Thanks for the link to the PDF. For years TMG could print that kind of
chart and many more. In
Hello again Legacy,
I have been lurking now for a few months and though the recent posts concerning
OS and genealogy programs were something I could comment on.
Back in the early part of this year I decided to begin weaning my self off Win
98 and begin exploring OS and genealogy programs. I had
]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 5:57 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy vs TMG
I have TMG 6 that I upgraded from TMG 5. I have tried on many occasions to
work with it and cannot.
If you want to spend you time fooling around with the software and forget
about
/
_
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 10:59:43 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy vs TMG
Rodney Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Legacy 7 does not yet support witness, but it does have a very good
/
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy vs TMG
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 12:08:12 -0500
This was my experience with TMG, as well. I even got the TMG training
videos in hopes they would help sort out why this thing was harder
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of philip
thorne
Sent: 30 May 2008 16:00
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy vs TMG
Rodney Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Legacy 7 does not yet support witness, but it does have a very good CHARTING
addition.
See for an example http
Hi, Penny -- You obviously have a lot more experience with it than I do.
I tried TMG (and a bunch of others, like PAF, Roots Magic and GenBox)
before I committed to Legacy. It was a no-brainer for me. Legacy
was user-friendly enough that I could start using it right away, without
any tips,
Hi Jane,
Three comments.
Legacy 7 reports give the option to have sources as footnotes,
endnotes or endnotes at the end of each section/generation.
Re importing an FTM generated GEDCOM into Legacy. There are notes on
the Legacy Web pages on what options to choose when exporting the
Gedcom
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy vs TMG
Penny,
I agree. I do not want an event driven style of database but, like you, one
that is people/family driven. I would think also that it would be extremely
difficult to combine the two approaches into a unified database
Keith- I imagine we all could. Instead, please go to this page:
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Compare.asp
There, Legacy is compared against several others. It is compared against
PAF, FTM, RM, and TMG.
Thanks.
Robert
Keith Bage wrote:
Can anyone tell me what functionality that Legacy
Keith,
For an extremely unbiased :) comparison see our comparison chart at
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Compare.asp.
Geoff (...still...at the Las Vegas airport...)
- Original Message -
From: Keith Bage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Thu, 29
I Moved from TMG to Legacy, but that was a long time ago.
The main reason I have a large file, and making a GEDCOM of that file in TMG
took
more than 4 days, in Legacy abt 2 hours. Making the report I always use took
in TMG 4 days, in Legacy less than 2 hours.
The one thing I miss in Legacy is
I downloaded a trial of TMG last night to see what all the fuss about
Witness' was about.
Took quite awhile to download, quite awhile to install, and after an
enormous amount of time waiting for the process to import my current
database - I got tired of waiting and went to bed, this morning the
(and I do know we can override them).
Keith
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geoff
Rasmussen
Sent: 29 May 2008 18:23
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy vs TMG
Keith,
For an extremely
Keith
This link may help
http://genealogy-software-review.toptenreviews.com/
Brendan Caley
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Bage
Sent: 29 May 2008 18:21
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy vs TMG
Can anyone
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy vs TMG
I Moved from TMG to Legacy, but that was a long time ago.
The main reason I have a large file, and making a GEDCOM of that file in TMG
took
more than 4 days, in Legacy abt 2 hours. Making the report I always use took
.
They are getting there.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Geoff Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 1:23 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy vs TMG
Keith,
For an extremely unbiased :) comparison see our comparison chart at
http
] On Behalf Of Keith Bage
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 3:40 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy vs TMG
Thanks Geoff! And completely unbiased eh.
To be fair it did remind me of some damn good options TMG doesn't have.
Still, very interested to see how the sourcewriter
to all,
My whole family switched to TMG, by Wholly Genes!
TMG is orders of magnitudes better than Legacy!
TMG handles duplicates much better!
TMG handles and sorts on aliases!
TMG has a bigger learning curve.
In TMG, you can customize your working screen(s) - better than Legacy ever will
be.
I have used both programs and yes TMG has a major learning curve but as
stated it goes way beyond Legacy however the majority of us will never need
the in-depth functionality of TMG.
Speaking of which does the new version of Legacy include an entry for
witnesses and can it print family trees?
or Commodore 64
computers so I uninstalled it and now I sit here updating my familytree in
Legacy waiting for the new version to become available.
Steve
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 14:43:11 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy vs TMG
Legacy 7 does include CHARTING - it does not use witnesses.
Keith
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:10 PM, philip thorne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have used both programs and yes TMG has a major learning curve but as
stated it goes way beyond Legacy however the majority of us will never need
the
36 matches
Mail list logo
