The usual advice is to be sure there are no check marks anywhere in
the show only column of the master source list.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:06 PM, lisagarre...@verizon.net wrote:
PLEASE HELP!
My Master Source List just disappeared! I was entering data and went to
Cite a Master Source from
Kevin,
There are a couple of thoughts here. Firstly, you do not have the country so
mapping will not know where to look, and secondly, have you tried zooming
in? When the map is zoomed out the location can seem to be many miles from
the true location, but as one zooms in the more accurate it
I have people who have their own RIN correctly but a second RIN
appears if they are shown as married women on the name list, as
follows:
RIN 70 Revd. Henry Charles PHILPOTT (1794-1873) - This is the correct
person and RIN
RIN 70 Mrs Eliza Annie CLARKE (1794-1873) - This person does not exist
I too have been following this thread for a while. If memory serves me
correctly, the Legacy Training CD's support what Cynthia stated below. The
plethora of information available to us such as family group sheets on LDS,
Ancestry, etc. should be viewed as nothing more than Clues or Leads as to
I'm discovering basically the same thing... only different,
I set up wife's new computer and generated a ged.com
for her, when we opened it up, everyone was doubled with
new RINs.
Not sure what happened, I've done this litterally dozens of times
w/o this happening.
Gene
-Original
Charles, I agree with you. I use these sources as leads. And, as you stated,
I have broken through a number of brick walls with these resources. I would
never have found these people had it not been for the LDS sites, Family
Trees on Ancestry, etc. I prove everything myself before information is
Elizabeth,
Why swap RINs? it can be a major cause of confusion, depending on how one
does it.
Nevertheless, you are where you are, and I suspect that your only way of
dealing with this is to delete the wrong person. I would check first using
the Index or Name list to ensure that you do actually
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:14:39 +, Elizabeth roobee...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have people who have their own RIN correctly but a second RIN
appears if they are shown as married women on the name list
If you have Generate Married Names turned on, try turning it off. Then
try turning it back on
Well, it was a long time ago and I wanted to give my immediate family
(newly arrived grandchildren etc.) low numbers.
I can't delete anyone as the phantoms are not there in person - just
their names wrong with the details etc. of the correct person with
that RIN. They appear on the Index and the
Yes, I've tried turning it on and off and exiting the program and
re-opening, file maintenance etc. - nothing works.
On 20 January 2011 16:54, Elizabeth roobee...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, it was a long time ago and I wanted to give my immediate family
(newly arrived grandchildren etc.) low
I have been trying to subscribe to this group and the only thing that I have
received is the confirmation email.
Thanks for your patience.
--
Susan
swind...@value.net
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
Guess you made it, Susan!!
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
From: Susan Swindell
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 4:39 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] just a test
I have been trying to subscribe to this group and the only thing that I have
received is the
Elizabeth,
I wonder if this is an obscure bug, and the married names are retaining the
RIN prior to your change. I have no idea if this is possible, and if you
have Access or Open Office, you may be able to have a look for yourself -
table tblIR contains Individual records. It maybe that Legacy
Susan, you might have received a message because Ron sent you a cc: of
his response. If you only received the one response, then the
indication is that you are NOT yet subscribed to the list.
Many of us have had problems subscribing or re-subscribing to the list
for some strange reason. When we
My mail goes through the Postini service and that service has been flagging a
lot of Legacy messages as junk here lately. No rhyme or reason why.
Ron Bernier
Sent from my Blackberry
From: William Boswell [mailto:whbosw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 12:32 PM
To:
I've been using v7.4, and just upgraded to v. 7.5. In neither of
them can I export latitude/longitude, even though I have places
geo-coded. I've tried various GEDCOM types, and NONE of them show
LATI nor LONG as export options to be included in the GEDCOM.
Can anyone explain why this is?
Did you try exporting from Legacy as a Legacy file, not as a gedcom
file? You might want to try that - it does make a difference on
several things. However, I still have Legacy 7.4 and have not upgraded
to 7.5 yet. --Jerry in Michigan
On 01/20/2011 02:10 PM, Gene Wheeler wrote:
I've been
Try unlink.
Rich in LA CA
--- On Thu, 1/20/11, Elizabeth roobee...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Elizabeth roobee...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Phantom people - duplicated RINs
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Date: Thursday, January 20, 2011, 8:54 AM
Well, it was a long time ago and I
Yes, I have. Still no options to select; however, I exported it
anyway then searched the file for LATI and LONG to no avail.
Gene
=
At 02:15 PM 1/20/2011, you wrote:
Did you try exporting from Legacy as a Legacy file, not as a gedcom
file? You might want to try that - it does make
I don't know if this will shed any light on what you are experiencing or
not, but I exported my file as a Legacy file, then imported into my TNG
website and the coordinates appeared without a problem. I don't know
how TNG handles the importing of the coordinates, but there is no LATI
or LONG in
Well, that's beyond my capabilities, but Dennis is kindly looking at it for me.
On 20 January 2011 17:42, Ron Ferguson ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
Elizabeth,
I wonder if this is an obscure bug, and the married names are retaining the
RIN prior to your change. I have no idea if this is
Thanks to all for the suggestions. I think I'll try making my own template as
Robert suggests. I might not remember about using override with the normal
census template. I'm assuming that once the template is created it will appear
somewhere in the list in Source Writer?
-Original
I've exported LATI and LONG in 7.4 before. (I've not upgraded to 7.5
yet) To clarify, are you saying the LATI and LONG options do not
appear in the customize options, or that the actual GEDCOM you've
exported does not contain those tags? If it's just that they do not
appear in the customize
I'm saying that LATI and LONG options do NOT appear in the list of
Items available for export from which you choose items to include
in the list Export these items. This is true in 7.4 and 7.5,
regardless of whether I choose to export a GEDCOM as a Legacy
version, GEDCOM 5.5 only, or any of the
*Let me ask this: If I print an ancestor as an Individual Report, the
portion that prints data from General Notes, which font is supposed to be
used? Anyone know for sure?*
**
*Thanks.*
**
*Robert
*
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Gene Wheeler bridge...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm saying that LATI
Sorry, but I have tried that several times! If they should up, they
should show up as 4 LATI and 4 LONG.
Gene
=
At 03:56 PM 1/20/2011, you wrote:
Just search the GEDCOM for LATI and LONG (without the 4). I just tried
it with 7.5 and they are included.
Legacy User Group
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 15:52:54 -0500, Gene Wheeler bridge...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm saying that LATI and LONG options do NOT appear in the list of
Items available for export from which you choose items to include
in the list Export these items. This is true in 7.4 and 7.5,
regardless of whether I
Gene-
This doesn't help your case, but they *DO* show up like for me. They
showed up six or seven times, I think for everyone I do have Lat and
Long information for. Obviously, we have something different, probably
a different setting somewhere. Yes, I am on Legacy 7.5. Or, did I
misunderstand
What on earth does this have to do with latitude, longitude and gedcoms?
Start a new thread for a new topic, please.
CE
From: Robert E. Carneal [mailto:kentuckygenealog...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 1:00 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Cannot
I'm at 7.4.0.45.
I cannot export LATI or LONG for locations, using Gedcom 5.5. In fact, in
customize, it's not even in the list of items available for export.
However, in the 'export these items', the tag _PLAC_DEFN is there. However,
although I have a record with lat/long, I do not get a
On 20/01/2011 19:56, mbstx wrote:
Thanks to all for the suggestions. I think I'll try making my own
template as Robert suggests. I might not remember about using
override with the normal census template. I'm assuming that once
the template is created it will appear somewhere in the list in
On 20/01/2011 20:59, Robert E. Carneal wrote:
*Let me ask this: If I print an ancestor as an Individual Report, the
portion that prints data from General Notes, which font is supposed to
be used? Anyone know for sure?*
Please do not post in HTML.
Please do not hi-jack a thread to discuss
Hi Gene. Did you resolve your issue? Lost in all the discussion, at
least for me, is what program you are transferring your Legacy gedcom
into? Just wondering if that might make any difference. I simply used
the defaults, but saved my export as a Legacy file, not a gedcom,
imported into TNG
Jerry,
No joy yet. I'm importing into TNG; however, that is a moot
point. When I inspect the GEDCOM created by Legacy, I'm not finding
the LATI or the LONG statement, even though virtually every location
in my database has been Geo-coded, even the Event locations.
Gene
=
At
Gene,
If you are importing into TMG, why not use their import feature. TMG can
import a Legacy .fdb directly.
Ron Bernier
Sent from my Blackberry
- Original Message -
From: Gene Wheeler [mailto:bridge...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 06:41 PM
To:
Sorry, I misread.
Ron Bernier
Sent from my Blackberry
- Original Message -
From: Gene Wheeler [mailto:bridge...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 07:20 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Cannot export Lat/Long
Ron -
Ron,
I'm using the very same setup and file. GEDCOM 5.5 does not, by
default, include _PLAC _DEFN. You have to use the export to Legacy
type file to get that element. so I started the process by selecting
Legacy GEDCOM, then moved _PLAC _DEFN to the right column, then saved
the customized
Why not just select export as Legacy, use defaults and don't change back to
gedcom? I think that might negate your changes??
Gene Wheeler bridge...@gmail.com wrote:
Ron,
I'm using the very same setup and file. GEDCOM 5.5 does not, by
default, include _PLAC _DEFN. You have to use the export
When you use the EXPORT menu selection on Legacy, even when you select
LEGACY as the type of file and not GEDCOM, in reality you are still
creating a GEDCOM file. The only thing I can tell you is that I used
LEGACY for my EXPORT (NOT GEDCOM). Then I just let the defaults take
care of themselves,
Charles,
Check out the Help of RIN's.
For those who want to control the number used by Legacy, I would look into the
use of User ID numbers.
Thanks,
David C Abernathy
Email disclaimers
This message represents the
Jerry,
I did as you suggested, and lo and behold, the resulting GEDCOM did
indeed have the _PLAC_DEFN and LATI/LONG entries! I'll import it
into TNG and see what happens. Thanks for your persistence and
help! Perhaps TNG can now adapt their position that GEDCOM 5.5 is required.
Gene
Great! I hope it works out for you! --Jerry
On 01/20/2011 08:57 PM, Gene Wheeler wrote:
Jerry,
I did as you suggested, and lo and behold, the resulting GEDCOM did
indeed have the _PLAC_DEFN and LATI/LONG entries! I'll import it
into TNG and see what happens. Thanks for your persistence
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:30:49 -0500, Charles Apple
apple1...@embarqmail.com wrote:
I have been following this thread with interest. Someone please correct me if
I am wrong, however, am I to understand that renumbering RINs can cause
confusion and is not necessarily a good thing to do.
I was
Hi Charles,
I was considering renumbering some RINs, until this thread came up. Now I am
not sure whether to do it or not.
What are your reasons for considering renumbering your RINs? These
could be important in your decision-making.
If it is, as was mentioned earlier, to give someone close
44 matches
Mail list logo
