: singhals
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 5:42 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] ISO labor-lite suggestions re tagging
Database/familyfile of ~15,000 persons and 5100 marriages.
ORIGINALLY created by keying in the contents of a genealogy
book. First done in PAF5
Thanks, I hadn't remembered that dodge.
Cheryl
Jay 1FamilyTree wrote:
First look at your index of names with the sort by RIN
number and from the end of the list.. see how far down you
can go before you start hitting the point where they are in
the book.
Tag those and that should be the
Ron Taylor wrote:
If you added all the info from a book, then the RINs should
have been assigned sequentially. Assuming that you did not
fill abandoned RINs which are left when records are
deleted...then all the book entries should be in a given
range of RINs. Second assumption is that the
Cheryl,
Have you thought about using the DATE ADDED information, perhaps that would
separate the book from more recent additions.
SearchFindIndividualAdded Date After or Beforeestimated date you think you
finished added the book.
Laird
On 4/1/2014 4:42 PM, singhals wrote:
Database/familyfile of
Database/familyfile of ~15,000 persons and 5100 marriages.
ORIGINALLY created by keying in the contents of a genealogy
book. First done in PAF5, then ported to Legacy 7 and then
to 8.
Everyone in the book ought to be in the db/ff.
Unfortunately, while documenting those people, I've added
people
that you can then look them up
to see if they are in the book or not.
-Original Message-
From: singhals
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 5:42 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] ISO labor-lite suggestions re tagging
Database/familyfile of ~15,000 persons and 5100
First look at your index of names with the sort by RIN number and from the
end of the list.. see how far down you can go before you start hitting the
point where they are in the book.
Tag those and that should be the bulk of your additions.
The remaining will have to be done as you suggested
If you added all the info from a book, then the RINs should have been assigned
sequentially. Assuming that you did not fill abandoned RINs which are left
when records are deleted...then all the book entries should be in a given range
of RINs. Second assumption is that the data from the book
8 matches
Mail list logo
