for the 10th can be said to be
independent sources. Back to square one. Thanks! --Paula
From: Cathy Pinner genea...@gmail.com
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2014 7:27 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Quality questions
I don't
at the primary document!
CE
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 13:20:56 -0700
From: paula.ryb...@sbcglobal.net
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source Quality questions
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Cathy, The document was filled out by the father (my great-grandfather)--he was
the 'informant' I guess
CE WOOD said the following on 24/08/2014 09:33:
In your case, the informant was not the person who was born, as Cathy
mistakenly assumed, but the father of the person. It is more likely
that he was correct about the birth date of his daughter!
Yeah, right. As they say around here!
My
I'm working on a very focused research project, just one question, and doing it
the right way per two recent Legacy webinars the Geneal. Stds. book, to
test out some of the new v8 functionality--namely Source Quality analysis on
the Source Detail citations. See how it works for this one
.
From: Paula Ryburn
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2014 6:17 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Source Quality questions
I'm working on a very focused research project, just one question, and doing it
the right way per two recent Legacy webinars the Geneal. Stds. book, to
test out
, 2014 6:17 PM
*To:* legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
mailto:legacyusergroup@Leg
acyUsers.com
*Subject:* [LegacyUG] Source Quality questions
I'm working on a very focused research project, just one question, and
doing it the right way per two recent Legacy webinars the Geneal.
Stds. book
6 matches
Mail list logo
