From: JACQUE FULLMAN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com
Subject: Re: FW: [LegacyUG] Local site field
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 07:28:04 -0700
What do you do when there's nothing to go on to begin with?I mean how far
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JACQUE
FULLMAN
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 10:50 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com
Subject: Re: FW: [LegacyUG] Local site field
From: JACQUE FULLMAN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com
To: LegacyUserGroup
, 2005 11:10 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com
Subject: Re: FW: [LegacyUG] Local site field
On 9/24/05, Keith Bage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim,
This is why I don't understand the request. I you surround parts of
your address with [[ ]] then it will not print. However if you
to read the mail at a cemetery!
Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jennifer
Crockett
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 8:33 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com
Subject: RE: FW: [LegacyUG] Local site field
How would this work
.
Jennifer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Henderson
Sent: Monday, 26 September 2005 11:53 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com
Subject: RE: FW: [LegacyUG] Local site field
Jennifer, Jim is correct in that the four principle
What would be the advantages of this over using the address fields?
Keith Bage
BAGE One Name Study (GOONS registered # 4451)
P. S. Check out Legacy Family Tree today!
This full featured genealogy program can be downloaded FREE at
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Index.asp?mid=5917ADi
Is
: [LegacyUG] Local site field
What would be the advantages of this over using the address fields?
Keith Bage
BAGE One Name Study (GOONS registered # 4451)
P. S. Check out Legacy Family Tree today!
This full featured genealogy program can be downloaded FREE at
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
September 2005 6:43 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com
Subject: RE: FW: [LegacyUG] Local site field
What would be the advantages of this over using the address fields?
Keith Bage
BAGE One Name Study (GOONS registered # 4451)
P. S. Check out Legacy Family Tree today!
This full featured
@mail.millenniacorp.com
Subject: RE: FW: [LegacyUG] Local site field
What would be the advantages of this over using the address fields?
Keith Bage
BAGE One Name Study (GOONS registered # 4451)
P. S. Check out Legacy Family Tree today!
This full featured genealogy program can be downloaded FREE at
http
a few people to
see how it can be used.
Jennifer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith
Bage
Sent: Saturday, 24 September 2005 6:43 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com
Subject: RE: FW: [LegacyUG] Local site field
What would
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of C.G.
Ouimet
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 5:15 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com
Subject: RE: FW: [LegacyUG] Local site field
I haven't downloaded the Genbox trial but I did take the tour.
The at localation field would be a nice upgrade
@mail.millenniacorp.com
Subject: Re: FW: [LegacyUG] Local site field
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 22:54:06 -0400
I agree - a Local Site field would simplify things a LOT.
Margaret
- Original Message - From: Virginia Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com
Sent: Friday, September 23
. The whole idea of the local site field is to
avoid this.
Jennifer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Henderson
Sent: Saturday, 24 September 2005 11:24 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com
Subject: RE: FW: [LegacyUG] Local site field
To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com
Subject: RE: FW: [LegacyUG] Local site field
I haven't downloaded the Genbox trial but I did take the tour.
The at localation field would be a nice upgrade to Legacy for
street addresses, churches, hospitals, etc. Currently I use the Notes
section
=5917ADi
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim
Winfrey
Sent: 24 September 2005 15:42
To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com
Subject: Re: FW: [LegacyUG] Local site field
Matt,
I think the issue is that sometimes I want to print
To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com
Subject: Re: FW: [LegacyUG] Local site field
Matt,
I think the issue is that sometimes I want to print the address
details and sometimes I only want to print the local site name the
address is for. Presently in Legacy it's all or nothing. If I use
the event
FREE at
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Index.asp?mid=5917ADi
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim
Winfrey
Sent: 24 September 2005 17:10
To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com
Subject: Re: FW: [LegacyUG] Local site field
On 9/24/05, Keith
To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com
Subject: Re: FW: [LegacyUG] Local site field
On 9/24/05, Keith Bage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim,
This is why I don't understand the request. I you surround parts of
your address with [[ ]] then it will not print. However if you do at
somepoint want them
Matt, Thanks for this interesting idea. I will have to test it
ut! --Paula
It seems the best solution without a new version would be to tweak a current
field, such as the Description Field in an Event. Using this field for an
address works, and it can be searched for in the DETAILED SEARCH
: RE: FW: [LegacyUG] Local site field
It seems the best solution without a new version would be to tweak a
current
field, such as the Description Field in an Event. Using this field for
an
address works, and it can be searched for in the DETAILED SEARCH
feature,
and all individuals can be tagged
Yes I agree. This would be much less awkward than having to play around
with entering data into the event address list in a way that will read
properly on reports.
Virginia
Snip
To the developers:
Is Legacy ever going to include a Local Site field as is included in
some other genealogy
I vote a big YES.
Larry
---Original Message---
From: Virginia Smith
Date: 09/23/05 21:01:56
To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com
Subject: RE: FW: [LegacyUG] Local site field
Yes I agree. This would be much less awkward than having to play around
with entering data
I agree - a Local Site field would simplify things a LOT.
Margaret
- Original Message -
From: Virginia Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 10:01 PM
Subject: RE: FW: [LegacyUG] Local site field
Yes I agree. This would
.
Margaret
- Original Message - From: Virginia Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 10:01 PM
Subject: RE: FW: [LegacyUG] Local site field
Yes I agree. This would be much less awkward than having to play around
with entering data
YES, this is a MAJOR shortcoming of Legacy. I've got lots of census
information which indicates the address where the individual
was living at the time of the sentence. This is a must.
I usually add this as a comment with a Residence event.
Glen
Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines
25 matches
Mail list logo
