Re: [LegacyUG] Descendant Book

2001-07-08 Thread Jan Roberts
Dirk, This is a big problem for me too. Like you, I hope they are working on it. Legacy is fantastic - just wish the reports had a few less problems. But at least we know they do work on the problems. Cheers Jan - Original Message - From: Dirk Detmar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: [LegacyUG] Sources

2001-07-21 Thread Jan Roberts
At the risk of buying into an argument, I don't think any of us are saying we DON'T record our sources - but some people prefer to trust the work of others, always remaining aware of the pitfalls of doing so, and that if we receive research from other people THAT is the source of that particular

Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy 4.0 wish list

2001-08-08 Thread Jan Roberts
My thoughts also. I'd love the reports to generate properly for all users before worrying about geography for some users. Cheers, Jan - Original Message - From: Jean Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ken McGinnis [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 4:03 PM

Re: [LegacyUG] Text/HTML output

2001-08-17 Thread Jan Roberts
Jan Rossen, Sorry, I can't help it - your problem must be that your copy of Legacy is just TOO old! VBG Jan (July 26 1002 build) To unsubscribe: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Re: [LegacyUG] Occasional repeated messages ... ?

2001-08-29 Thread Jan Roberts
You could very well be right - on other lists Reply All sends a copy of the reply to the individual original sender, and to the list. I notice that in Legacy UG Reply All puts Legacy UG there twice. Jan - Original Message - From: N. B. Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [LegacyUG] Changing Picture locations / Report problems

2002-01-20 Thread Jan Roberts
\Graphics. Under How to Find, check exact. Under How to Replace, check Replace only found text with replacement text. Then click Start. Hope this helps, Sheri Lynn - Original Message - From: Jan Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:43 PM

Re: [LegacyUG] Changing Picture locations / Report problems

2002-01-20 Thread Jan Roberts
Thanks Richard - when I used the browse feature to locate the picture I wanted I wasn't asked if I wanted to change all in the file, but I did notice that ALL of the photos in my file called C:/My Documents/My Pictures/Graphics/GOOD seemed to attach themselves correctly after I re-linked just one

Re: [LegacyUG] Creating PDF Reports

2002-02-17 Thread Jan Roberts
just the one you are choosing to use. Message order can be very strange at times. Wm Voss -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jan Roberts Sent: Sunday, 17 February, 2002 14:38 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Creating PDF

Re: [LegacyUG] Problem: new husband adopts wife's child -- Need Adoption as a fixed variable

2002-02-17 Thread Jan Roberts
My thoughts exactly. Especially where the STEP relationships are concerned, because not all second marriages involve the legal adoption of the spouses' children. And this is NOT just a recent social phenomenon - if you look at the 19th Century Census returns you will find step-children all

[LegacyUG] Another Oops on my part!

2002-02-17 Thread Jan Roberts
Just realised why I'm not seeing my own messages. In an effort to organise my email, I have created a number of rules - some just recently. And as I like to keep what I have sent, so I can refer back to it, resend if it didn't get through, check to see if I DID send what I said I would etc.

[LegacyUG] Can't find notes

2002-02-21 Thread Jan Roberts
When I preview a Descendant Narrative Report I have a note about the birth of my cousin, mentioning that he was born on my 15th birthday and that we were our respective father's first children. The notes were imported as part of my TMG GEDCOM. I need to edit the notes - but do you think I

Re: [LegacyUG] Program locks up

2002-03-15 Thread Jan Roberts
Just like to report that I have downloaded version 4.0, paid for the upgrade to Deluxe, and although it is Saturday afternoon here in Oz I received my customer number within half an hour. (This after I thought I was going to have to wait until after the weekend, because even with the time

Re: [LegacyUG] NameList Enhancement

2002-03-24 Thread Jan Roberts
For some reason, Pat's 'attachment' was the message to which she was replying - nothing sinister. Cheers, Jan - Original Message - From: Janet And Rory Burgess To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 5:37 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] NameList

Re: [LegacyUG] New General Release Build - 10 April 2002

2002-04-11 Thread Jan Roberts
When I downloaded the update last night it still took nearly 20 minutes - yet I have Deluxe and used the automatic download option. This has been the case for each update of version 4.0 so far. Is this normal? I have a 56k modem that tells me it is downloading at about 4.5kbps on average when

Re: [LegacyUG] New General Release Build - 10 April 2002

2002-04-11 Thread Jan Roberts
Thank you Lisa and Ketil! - Original Message - From: Lisa Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:48 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] New General Release Build - 10 April 2002 Makes perfect sense. 20 minutes times 60 seconds/minutes = 1200 seconds.

[LegacyUG] Merging Two Family Files

2002-06-05 Thread Jan Roberts
Firstly, thanks for the couple of suggestions re the wisdom of removing the married name AKAs that imported from TMG. I've come to the conclusion that no harm will be done if I remove them, especially as they are basically useless in the name search list as AKAs because they only have '~ MARRIED

Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcing is simple

2002-06-05 Thread Jan Roberts
Hugh, you so often express things exactly the way I feel. I think I've said it before - must be the name! (My maiden name is Sullivan!) Cheers, Jan - Original Message - From: J. Hugh Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:04 PM Subject: Re:

Re: [LegacyUG] Pound symbol

2002-10-15 Thread Jan Roberts
Robert, Tom Purser has just solved the problem. I wasn't using the Numeric keypad. Thanks, Jan - Original Message - From: Robert Carneal [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:01 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Pound symbol Jan, where were you in in

Re: [LegacyUG] Pound symbol

2002-10-15 Thread Jan Roberts
Thanks Tom - I wasn't using the numeric keypad. I can now add the £ sign to my Legacy notes. Cheers Jan - Original Message - From: Tom Purser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:14 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Pound symbol Be sure to use the

Re: [LegacyUG] Child-Parent Relationships

2003-03-07 Thread Jan Roberts
Hopefully one of the options will be Relationship to Father / Mother : Step-son or Step-daughter! Cheers Jan - Original Message - From: Ken McGinnis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 3:40 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Child-Parent Relationships In

Re: [LegacyUG] Never Married

2003-06-29 Thread Jan Roberts
This is also why I would like to be able to change the wording in the Descendant Narrative Report to Known children of this couple. The option to change this wording is available in the Descendant Register report, but not the Descendant Narrative. Jan If really needed, something less emphatic

Re: [LegacyUG] Never Married

2003-06-29 Thread Jan Roberts
The use of the term Marriage List doesn't bother me, as I know what it means. But it seems to me that most people are seeing the use of this term or not as a Legacy issue. Surely MRIN stands for Marriage Record Identity Number - and MRIN is common to every genealogy program I have ever used.

[LegacyUG] Marriage List

2003-06-29 Thread Jan Roberts
Sorry, should have checked the subject before I responded. The use of the term Marriage List doesn't bother me, as I know what it means. But it seems to me that most people are seeing the use of this term or not as a Legacy issue. Surely MRIN stands for Marriage Record Identity Number - and

Re: [LegacyUG] Descendant Narrative Title Pages

2003-11-16 Thread Jan Roberts
Thanks, but [CoupleName] doesn't really achieve what I want, as it puts an ampersand after the husband's name, then wife's name on the next line. I want to be able to have husband's name on one line, and on the next, wife's name on the next line. It used to work that way as I have paper copies

Re: [LegacyUG] Descendant Narrative Title Pages

2003-11-16 Thread Jan Roberts
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jan Roberts Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup%40mail.millenniacorp.com/ To unsubscribe please

Re: [LegacyUG] OT - Reply / Reply All

2003-11-22 Thread Jan Roberts
Sorry to disagree, but some other lists show [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] (obviously fictional addresses here) - one being the sender of the message being replied to, the other being the mailing list to which the message was sent - when you hit ReplyAll. I do believe this is set by the

Re: [LegacyUG] Split screen

2003-12-27 Thread Jan Roberts
Have just been checking out some errors other people were finding - I know, this one was reported way back in November, but it's a busy time of year, and I don't recall seeing a response other than from Anna B who says hers was working fine. I am using the latest build, but when I go to Split

Re: [LegacyUG] Event Definitions

2004-01-09 Thread Jan Roberts
Just checked this out (also 18th Dec. version) and the new event is highlighted as it should be after being Saved. Cheers Jan - Original Message - From: Connie Spindel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 4:14 AM Subject: [LegacyUG] Event Definitions

Re: [LegacyUG] Suggestion : Legacy - Premium Edition

2004-02-08 Thread Jan Roberts
This gets my vote too! I've (willingly) upgraded at a (very moderate) cost twice since my original purchase - but some report problems that I was seeing in Version 3 are still problems in Version 5. I fully understand that everything can't be done at once - but I would like to see reported

Re: [LegacyUG] Setting Preferred Spouse - 2nd Posting - No Reply

2004-03-04 Thread Jan Roberts
I reported seeing the same behaviour on 22.02.04 when Keith first posted about this problem. Cheers Jan - Original Message - From: Mark Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 6:16 PM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Setting Preferred Spouse - 2nd Posting - No

Re: [LegacyUG] one mother two father's

2004-03-13 Thread Jan Roberts
You have to think outside the usual meaning of marriage when entering the two people who produced an offspring - think of it as a term that covers any relationship between two people (dare I say man and woman). No genealogy program can cater for every term that various users might prefer to use

Re: [LegacyUG] Pictures in rtf file book reports

2004-08-09 Thread Jan Roberts
Wonderful!!! Whilst I am quite prepared to repeatedly edit an rtf report (i.e. after new information is added etc.) so that it accommodates my blended families without repeated data for the steps it really is a pain having to insert all of the images again. Cheers Jan - Original Message -

Re: [LegacyUG] To Do List

2004-10-29 Thread Jan Roberts
- Original Message - Something I have learnt the hard way is that it is necessary to record what you DIDN'T find as well as what you did find. (I read this somewhere but its significance didn't penetrate my thick skull until I kept going back to the same source for the same

Re: [LegacyUG] Advanced Set Living surprise

2004-11-01 Thread Jan Roberts
Alice, I would check whether you have inadvertently made changes to your report settings. I've only checked out Descendant Narrative options, but under Report Options Format you will see Suppress details for living people with a sub-option Change name to Living. It also has the option to

Re: [LegacyUG] Adoption -- how to enter?

2004-11-12 Thread Jan Roberts
Ah yes, but unless you actually link the step-children to the step-parent they do NOT show up as 1/2 children on reports. For example - I have a daughter by my first marriage. My husband has a son and a daughter from his first marriage. The three children are recorded with their respective

Re: [LegacyUG]Maiden Name?

2004-11-22 Thread Jan Roberts
Yes, but that means you have to keep changing the SURNAME field in the record for Mary Louise, and you also have to keep adding to the GIVEN NAME. (For instance if you add a young girl to your database and she subsequently marries one or more times - or if you don't know about a name change due

Re: [LegacyUG] AKA Function

2004-11-22 Thread Jan Roberts
Definitely - at the moment they sort alphabetically which isn't the best. Cheers Jan - Original Message - From: Bill Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Legacy Group [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 3:31 AM Subject: [LegacyUG] AKA Function It would be nice to be able to

Re: [LegacyUG] EVENTS Description

2004-11-25 Thread Jan Roberts
You can leave description blank if you like, and put 1881 in the date as Lewis suggested - but I use description to record the country of the Census. eg EVENT = Census DESCRIPTION = British DATE = 1881 PLACE = the address as identified in the Census I modified the Event Sentence (if all fields

Re: [LegacyUG] Descendant narrative report

2004-11-25 Thread Jan Roberts
Hear! Hear! This is a problem in single line reports as well, not just Multiple Lines of Descent reports. I have requested many times that the cut in point for not repeating Duplicate people be altered so that you don't get pages of events and notes repeated. Cheers Jan - Original Message

[LegacyUG] Half children

2004-11-27 Thread Jan Roberts
I have just found another anomoly with the half children display. I have (several probably, but one I just happened to notice) a woman who had a child with an unknown partner prior to her marriage to a (presumably) different partner. I have the display set to show half children. In the family

Re: [LegacyUG] Half children

2004-11-27 Thread Jan Roberts
Hi Cathy, For immediate families I do link the children to both sets of parents, and don't usually use Show Half children. But as you say, linking makes for messy reports. I don't quite understand why, since Legacy can obviously identify half siblings (although it also identifies step-siblings

Re: [LegacyUG] family information in MS Access database

2004-12-01 Thread Jan Roberts
I've received it four times! Each time with the attachment intact! Cheers Jan - Original Message - From: Connie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 12:36 PM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] family information in MS Access database I too have received

Re: [LegacyUG] Anyone actually doing family research?

2004-12-06 Thread Jan Roberts
Actually, by the time I sift through the more than 50% of my mail that is JUNK, then read most of the messsages in my Legacy folder (the second biggest group of messages I receive daily) I am too tired to do any research!! Cheers Jan - Original Message - From: Lance [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: [LegacyUG] Multiple Lines of Descent Report

2004-12-09 Thread Jan Roberts
I had a similar (it seems) problem with a Descendant Narrative Report some time back. I finally isolated it to one person in my database. To find it, I began the report from each successive generation until I got to the person who caused the report to lock up. Now, I'm sorry to say that for the

Re: [LegacyUG] The one thing that does drive me nuts about Legacy

2004-12-13 Thread Jan Roberts
And while we are at it, I reported quite a long time ago that repeating information in any of these fields by clicking on the hot spot automatically moves the cursor into the next field. So if you then add a source, expecting it to be added to the (say) birth data you will find yourself

[LegacyUG] Hot spots

2004-12-13 Thread Jan Roberts
Resending this, as it hasn't appeared yet, but a subsequent message appeared seconds after posting. And while we are at it, I reported quite a long time ago that repeating information in any of these fields by clicking on the hot spot automatically moves the cursor into the next field. So if

Re: [LegacyUG] Mixing Databases

2004-12-13 Thread Jan Roberts
I keep mine all in one database, mainly because I look at it from my daughter's perspective - they are ALL her ancestors so I need them in the same database if I am going to create accurate reports. Cheers Jan - Original Message - From: The Lavenders [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

Re: [LegacyUG] Cursor jumping to next field (was Hot spots)

2004-12-15 Thread Jan Roberts
Ah, but the point is that I do NOT have mine set to Move the cursor to the next field - so it shouldn't happen under any circumstances. It only happens when I use the much discussed 'hot spot' to insert data. By the way, if I right click, to gain access to the ten most recent entries for the

Re: [LegacyUG] Cursor jumping to next field (was Hot spots)

2004-12-15 Thread Jan Roberts
Mary, The 'hot spot' in this particular instance is the word in between the date and place fields for Birth, Christening/Baptism/ and Death. The term 'hot spot' is being used here because the original discussion began with a complaint that some 'hot spots' extend quite a way from the box they

Re: [LegacyUG] Cursor jumping to next field (was Hot spots)

2004-12-16 Thread Jan Roberts
Hi Ron, No, there is something strange happening, because I have been advised by several people that my last re-sent message did in fact appear twice. But it hasn't appeared ONCE in my mailbox. (I get individual messages from LUG, and they are all automatically directed to my Legacy mail

Re: [LegacyUG] Cursor jumping to next field (was Hot spots)

2004-12-16 Thread Jan Roberts
Hi Mary, No need to feel foolish! I didn't know that any of the hot spots beeped! I usually don't have my speakers turned on, so I've never heard a beep! Just tried it now - it seems to beep when you change from preferred spouse to non-preferred spouse, but not vice versa. No, that's not

Re: [LegacyUG] Cursor jumping to next field (was Hot spots)

2004-12-17 Thread Jan Roberts
Ah, thank you! It had to be something simple. Cheers Jan - Original Message - From: Carl Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 12:49 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Cursor jumping to next field (was Hot spots) By the way, why does that hot spot beep at

Re: [LegacyUG] Cursor jumping to next field (was Hot spots)

2004-12-15 Thread Jan Roberts
Resending this one too, as it hasn't appeared yet. Don't know what's happening, but this has happened a couple of times in recent days. Mary, The 'hot spot' in this particular instance is the word in between the date and place fields for Birth, Christening/Baptism/ and Death. The term 'hot

[LegacyUG] Follow-up - Not receiving own mail from LUG

2004-12-19 Thread Jan Roberts
Thanks to Brian I did some investigating, and found that somehow my own address had appeared on my MailWasher blacklist and was apparently being deleted from my ISP server before it appeared in the MailWasher list of messages. So I apologise to everyone for my couple of repeated messages - I

Re: [LegacyUG] Customizing Never Married feature and more

2005-01-05 Thread Jan Roberts
Yes, but the problem appears to be that in order to get a report to read accurately where there is an ex-nuptual child one must use the This person never married feature. This then creates a further problem if the parent later married and had other children because the This person never

Re: [LegacyUG] adding a - to a date

2005-01-15 Thread Jan Roberts
I started a response to this problem a few days ago, to say that I wasn't having a problem if I did such and such. I had even included a thanks to Legacy for apparently having fixed the strange way Legacy handles date ranges because I queried this some time ago. My original problem was that

Re: [LegacyUG] Showing Half Brothers and Sisters

2005-01-24 Thread Jan Roberts
Good idea! This would be much more informative. Cheers Jan - Original Message - From: Valerie Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Legacy Group LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 3:50 PM Subject: [LegacyUG] Showing Half Brothers and Sisters The

Re: [LegacyUG] name showing in sentences

2005-01-25 Thread Jan Roberts
Hi June, How right you are! I hadn't noticed that this was another situation where the Quoted Name isn't used according to the report options set. I've previously mentioned the problem that there are places when the quoted name itself isn't removed in Narratives, but hadn't noticed that the

Re: [LegacyUG] Christening- at what point is it probably unlikely?

2005-01-31 Thread Jan Roberts
No, (I've never heard 'christening' used to refer to anything but a baptism -- except when naming a ship.) but 'baptism' often refers to adult baptism. I was never christened as a baby, but I was baptised as a teenager - both are really done to signify entry into the Christian church rather

Re: [LegacyUG] PAF Insight

2005-02-19 Thread Jan Roberts
Same here - I choose not to use Geo database, and also wish I could use the IGI search facility without having to close the Geo database box EVERY time. Could it disappear once the option has been refused once? Cheers Jan - Original Message - From: John R. Bayle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: [LegacyUG] Free?

2005-02-26 Thread Jan Roberts
Methinks he might be refering to the Free Legacy Mouse Pad offer made recently - free if you spend $50 or more in the Legacy 'shop'. Guess some people are just never satisfied! Cheers Jan Legacy User Group Etiquette guidelines can be found at: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp To

Re: [LegacyUG] priorities - was: Names

2005-03-01 Thread Jan Roberts
No, I'm another who would prefer that report issues are resolved before new bells and whistles are added - although I have to say that the IGI search facility looks to be very useful from what I've fiddled with! Cheers Jan - Original Message - From: Claire Quortrup [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [LegacyUG] [LegacyUserGroup DIGEST]

2005-03-24 Thread Jan Roberts
Choose a report click Report Options then chose the Page Set Up tab, and select the size you want in the Paper Size box. Cheers Jan - Original Message - From: Mark Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 10:02 PM Subject: Re:

Re: [LegacyUG]

2005-03-29 Thread Jan Roberts
It may be that your email is set to send in HTML format as the default. But it might also be set to reply in the format of the sender. If this is the case you WILL be able to send a message to the list because you will be replying to a plain text message. However, if you get the address from

Re: [LegacyUG] Recording partners

2005-03-31 Thread Jan Roberts
You can create your own label - Partner. OPen the Marriage Information screen. Click the arrow at the right hand edge of the Status box. You will be presented with the current relationship labels. Click on the add button and create whatever label you would like. You can also change the

Re: [LegacyUG] Recording partners

2005-04-01 Thread Jan Roberts
Glad I could help - but you might need to continue checking, because if there are any children of this relationship you could find the report says Children of this marriage were:.. To overcome this, the actual Marraiage Status has to be set to Unmarried. You can still use the word

Re: [LegacyUG] Outlook Express Attachment of original message

2005-04-11 Thread Jan Roberts
Not so. I use Outlook Express 6 and my replies do not include the original as an attachment. In fact, other than the option to include message in reply, I can't see a setting relating to replying. I know that in Outlook you have the option of including the reply as an attachment or as part

Re: [LegacyUG] Outlook Express Attachment of original message

2005-04-11 Thread Jan Roberts
True - but then you are not necessarily replying, just forwarding the original message to someone else as an attachment to your message, rather than simply forwarding the original. Cheers Jan - Original Message - From: Gene Rusty [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: [LegacyUG] Update 12th. Apr.

2005-04-14 Thread Jan Roberts
Nor did I! Jan - Original Message - From: Mary Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 6:50 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Update 12th. Apr. Hello, Jack On 4/14/05, Jack Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For the first time I didn't

[LegacyUG] Strange Happenings With Name Fields in Sentence Definitions

2005-04-19 Thread Jan Roberts
Hello All, I have been trying to create an event that I know will only be used as a Marriage event. I have called it 'Husband Deserted Wife'. I have set the sentence definition as: The marriage ended when [FirstName] is said to have deserted [WifeFirstName] [onDate] and gone

Re: [LegacyUG] Strange Happenings With Name Fields in Sentence Definitions

2005-04-21 Thread Jan Roberts
Thanks for the suggestion Don, but that is actually what I did first off - the result is the same. - Original Message - From: Don Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 2:52 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Strange Happenings With Name

Re: [LegacyUG] Strange Happenings With Name Fields in Sentence Definitions

2005-04-21 Thread Jan Roberts
PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 2:58 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Strange Happenings With Name Fields in Sentence Definitions Jan Roberts wrote: Hello All, I have been trying to create an event that I know will only be used as a Marriage event

Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcing Questions

2005-04-21 Thread Jan Roberts
I have used Internet as a source type if I have found some information on the net about a place, or an occupation, or a ship for example - or if I am recording the fact that I have found information about the family on someone else's web site. Cheers Jan - Original Message - From: Kay

Re: [LegacyUG] Wish for future versions

2005-04-23 Thread Jan Roberts
Thanks for this tip about customising the columns in index view. I didn't know it existed and have often wished I could see a person's parents without having to go back to Family View, especially as I have many people with the same names. I have just saved an index view that allows me to see

Re: [LegacyUG] Request for future versions

2005-04-23 Thread Jan Roberts
Yes, but you can use the Source details or comments to specify exactly what each source is referencing. You can elect to have the source details show or not, for each specific sosurce. So you can elect to show details for sources which provide only part of the information. Cheers Jan -

Re: [LegacyUG] Strange Happenings With Name Fields in Sentence Definitions

2005-04-30 Thread Jan Roberts
Thanks for the thought Harvey, but I have actually tried all sorts of possibilities, and they all throw up incorrect results. I originally thought it was a problem because I was using the event as a Marriage Event, but Individual Events also. Cheers Jan - Original Message - From: HDH

Re: [LegacyUG] Printing notes in reports

2005-04-30 Thread Jan Roberts
Linda, You tracked the problem down to having used sentence override, but it seems a bit strange to me that you aren't getting ANY notes for events. It occurred that you might be using Sentence Override for all of your events. Is this the case? I rarely use Sentence Override - only if the

Re: [LegacyUG] Event Definition was Printing notes in reports

2005-05-01 Thread Jan Roberts
about it changing the current future ones, but sure didn't know it would the prior ones. Hope this makes sense I am quite distraught over this. Ann in New Mexico - Original Message - From: Jan Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005

Re: [LegacyUG] Strange Happenings With Name Fields in Sentence Definitions

2005-05-01 Thread Jan Roberts
The trouble is that even when I use [HusbFirstName] etc. for a marriage event I get the strange results that I first reported. i.e. The marriage ended when [HusbFirstName] is said to have deserted [WifeFirstName] [onDate] and gone [toDesc].[Sources] [Notes] I get - The marriage ended when Bill

Re: [LegacyUG] Event Definition was Printing notes in reports

2005-05-01 Thread Jan Roberts
don't see it in pages 85-87. Jan I am VERY glad you wrote about this. If not for you I would have never know this was retroactive. I appreciate you. Ann - Original Message - From: Jan Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 7:22 AM

Re: [LegacyUG] Defining the Event Sentence was Event Definition

2005-05-03 Thread Jan Roberts
Ann, I think I would probably leave the event sentences as they are - then, if and when you print out a report for a particular person / line you can chack to see if the events read correctly. If they don't, go in and change them for the individuals affected in that specific report. You can

Re: [LegacyUG] Defining the Event Sentence was Event Definition

2005-05-04 Thread Jan Roberts
You learn something every day! The Event Report is wonderful - I'd never looked at it before. It might take Ann a while to work through, but she wouldn't have to print the report out for each event - just preview it on the screen and note down the names of those where it doesn't read

Re: [LegacyUG] Defining the Event Sentence was Event Definition

2005-05-07 Thread Jan Roberts
: Jan Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 9:36 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Defining the Event Sentence was Event Definition looked at it before. It might take Ann a while to work through, but she wouldn't have to print the report out

Re: [LegacyUG] Event Report Glitch

2005-05-09 Thread Jan Roberts
Unless I'm looking in the wrong place I can't confirm this. I've tried creating the report using a single event, and also a selection of events. All event locations are showing correctly. However, it isn't picking up Marriage events, as Dennis has noted. I have the April 14th build. But

Re: [LegacyUG] Event Report Glitch

2005-05-09 Thread Jan Roberts
I have 14th April build - and locations are showing correctly. But where is the include menu you mention? Cheers Jan - Original Message - From: Kay Fordham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2005 2:02 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Event

Re: [LegacyUG] Event Report Glitch

2005-05-10 Thread Jan Roberts
to the right where you may select an event type; i.e., deed, obit, etc. Hope this helps. Kay - Original Message - From: Jan Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 3:55 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Event Report Glitch I have 14th April

Re: [LegacyUG] Event Report Glitch

2005-05-10 Thread Jan Roberts
Ah yes! I had seen the events to print option and had selected a specific event when I first tried this - but Kay mentioned an include tab so I thought I must have been missing something else. Didn't put two and two together is all! Silly me! Cheers Jan - Original Message - From:

Re: [LegacyUG] Considering switching to Legacy

2005-05-19 Thread Jan Roberts
I went from TMG (which I purchased at considerable cost) to Legacy about 4 years ago and have never regretted it for a minute. Yes there were things about TMG that I liked, but there was an enormous learning curve. I began with the Standard (free) version of Legacy - Version 3. I liked it so

Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy program

2005-05-25 Thread Jan Roberts
Adeptec (Roxio) Direct CD allows writing of Legacy backup files direct to CD, from within Legacy. Unfortunately when I converted to XP my particular version of Adeptec no longer worked! Prior to that I regularly selected E:/ drive (my CD burner) as the location of my backup saves, just as I

Re: [LegacyUG] Numbering out of sequence on Acnestor Reports

2005-06-02 Thread Jan Roberts
I assume you are talking about the RIN numbers. The only way I can think of to make them consecutive in a partial report is to tag the people you want included, export only the tagged individuals, import them into a new family database and choose the option to renumber RINs. That will give

Re: [LegacyUG] Occupation Event

2005-06-08 Thread Jan Roberts
Why would you use sentence override for this? Override only affects the specific instance of the event for which you use override. If you are going to override I don't see the point in using the variable fields - why not just type the sentence exactly as you want it for that instance?

Re: [LegacyUG] Occupation Event

2005-06-09 Thread Jan Roberts
True, I hadn't thought of that. Cheers Jan - Original Message - From: Jim Winfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@mail.millenniacorp.com Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 11:30 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Occupation Event Problem with changing the default sentence is that it

Re: [LegacyUG] Occupation Event

2005-06-10 Thread Jan Roberts
Oops! Sorry about the double posting. My Virus scanner told me it hadn't been sent due to a timeout (or somesuch) so I resent it. Just checked my Legacy folder and found it HAD been sent. Cheers Jan - Original Message - From: Jan Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup

Re: [LegacyUG] RE:Using quarterly dates in Legacy

2005-06-11 Thread Jan Roberts
I have 'inherited' (pardon the pun) some quarterly dates from a fellow researcher. He recorded them as Q1 1970 etc. I imported them into my Legacy database and haven't found them to be a problem. The age is still calculated accurately e.g. a birth recorded as Q1 1970 = 35 years old. Just

Re: [LegacyUG] Using quarterly dates in Legacy

2005-06-11 Thread Jan Roberts
Hadn't thought to check Potential problems when using Q1 etc. As Ron found, they are reported as Bad Dates when you run the report. But when I tried to enter a new person with a Q1 1972 date it didn't flag a bad date, and it DID calculate the age now. So I'm happy to leave it as Q1 etc. and

Re: [LegacyUG] Unmarried mother

2005-06-23 Thread Jan Roberts
Hi Susan I have dealt with this problem by linking Mary to a person called an unknown man (First name an unknown Surname man - no quotation marks - and NO capital letters.) The report then reads Mary had a child with an unknown man. They had one child, George. I make sure the child has

Re: [LegacyUG] Unmarried mother

2005-06-23 Thread Jan Roberts
Maybe Mary wasn't married to the father of Ann, but it isn't correct to say Mary never married in relation to one child if she later married and had other children. Cheers Jan Using latest build, same situation, mine reads: Mary never married. She had one daughter: Ann Steve Legacy

Re: [LegacyUG] Fw: Adding more children

2005-06-28 Thread Jan Roberts
Welcome to the world of Legacy, Bruce. You can certainly enter more than 15 children, but you can't see all fifteen at once. If you have the view set to show three columns of five children and you need to add more children you will see that an arrow appears in the right hand margin of the

RE: [LegacyUG] event sentence definitions: [HeShe] option

2005-07-28 Thread Jan Roberts
When you think about it there really isn't a problem. The coded fields are used to set up the main (leading)sentence for the event - which will be the same for each person for whom the event is used. Anything additional can easily be added in the Notes section - and surely the exact content of

RE: [LegacyUG] Snipping Messages

2005-09-13 Thread Jan Roberts
Hi Pati, You can set Outlook Express to include the original message when you reply. I used Outlook Express for years - but changed to Outlook a few weeks ago, and guess what - I can't remember exactly where you choose this option in Outlook Express. But you will find it somewhere in Tools

  1   2   >