On Mar 14, 2009, at 4:35 AM, Peter Miller wrote:
the viral nature of these licenses
I don't want a virus, but I like the reciprocal nature of these
licenses.
--
Russ Nelson - http://community.cloudmade.com/blog -
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:RussNelson
r...@cloudmade.com -
Hi,
Russ Nelson wrote:
I don't want a virus, but I like the reciprocal nature of these
licenses.
Reciprocal is not the correct term IMHO. Reciprocal would mean that if
you take our data you will have to give us something in return.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail
Hi Andy, Jukka,
I have created a new entry on the Potential Datasources wiki page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php?title=Potential_Datasourcesaction=submit#Corine_Land_Cover_2000_datasets.
I am also posting this to OSM-talk so more people can review the possibility
of using this
On 14/03/09 20:32, Ulf Möller wrote:
OSFM is trying to get ODbL 1.0 in place as soon as possible and fix
problems in version 1.1 later on.
The difficulty with doing that is that people who are approached about
relicensing their data might say no, because the licence is broken in
ways X, Y and
Hi,
Gervase Markham wrote:
OSFM is trying to get ODbL 1.0 in place as soon as possible and fix
problems in version 1.1 later on.
The difficulty with doing that is that people who are approached about
relicensing their data might say no, because the licence is broken in
ways X, Y and Z
On Mar 15, 2009, at 6:00 PM, Gervase Markham wrote:
why are we bothering with switching OSM to 1.0 at all?
Why not just wait for the 1.1 fixed version?
1) Because ODbL 1.0 is better than C-By-SA
2) Because it's not clear that we'll understand ODbL any time soon
well enough to fix any
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 08:26:14PM -0400, Russ Nelson wrote:
On Mar 15, 2009, at 6:00 PM, Gervase Markham wrote:
why are we bothering with switching OSM to 1.0 at all?
Why not just wait for the 1.1 fixed version?
1) Because ODbL 1.0 is better than C-By-SA
So far that is one thing that
On Mar 15, 2009, at 8:33 PM, Simon Ward wrote:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 08:26:14PM -0400, Russ Nelson wrote:
On Mar 15, 2009, at 6:00 PM, Gervase Markham wrote:
why are we bothering with switching OSM to 1.0 at all?
Why not just wait for the 1.1 fixed version?
1) Because ODbL 1.0 is better
